-fraυd

-fraυd — CS2 Stats

AQ76561199074498842[U:1:1114233114]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

757Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,409Top 25% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51091 of 259201 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,329 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (39 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 757 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,409 +10,234 11 Jan – 23 Sept · 21 days played
11,82622,511peak 22,51111 Jan23 Sept
22,618Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,414Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2026-01-11

Faceit ELO

  • 85 below peak (1,414)
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 22 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-12
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 102 below peak (22,511)
  • +405 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,591 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-fraυdFACEITLevel 7 · 1,329 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,409 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,414csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning53
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLLWLWLTTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility3.0
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.3
Utility3.0
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time518ms−97ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 12 Feb →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 0–5 · mirage, 4 Feb →
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · cache, 15 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 14 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 14dust2Weakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2112–957%-0.00
mirageB209–1145%0.00
ancientB189–950%0.01
nukeS1410–471%0.00
dust2C125–742%0.00
cacheA53–260%-0.04
anubis—43–175%0.03
overpass—30–30%-0.03
italy—10–10%-0.03
office—11–0100%-0.02
train—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

551Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
78.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17151%0.9215.0
Ancient10551%0.9715.7
Dust28050%0.9514.5
Inferno6936%0.8713.5
Nuke5860%0.9514.9
Anubis3158%1.0215.8
Train1850%0.9213.4
Overpass617%0.8614.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
71.4%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
523msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
55.3%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
0.5%Flash assists
6.76HE damage / grenade
5.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3789 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1249% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.049%24 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.1023%23 Jul →
dust213–20.0818%23 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0418%22 Jul →
inferno13–50.0015%22 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0521%20 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0511%19 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0412%19 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0120%19 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0516%18 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0114%18 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0321%18 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.048%18 Jul →
nuke13–90.0319%18 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0013%17 Jul →
dust213–110.0114%16 Jul →
inferno13–110.0418%16 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0613%15 Jul →
mirage11–130.0224%15 Jul →
inferno13–90.0316%13 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0319%12 Jul →
dust213–90.0623%11 Jul →
ancient13–80.0713%8 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0023%7 Jul →
mirage13–100.0316%7 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.095%6 Jul →
ancient4–130.0314%3 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0210%28 Jun →
mirage9–130.0217%24 Jun →
mirage13–2-0.0220%14 Jun →
ancient8–130.0616%14 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.066%13 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0024%7 Jun →
dust29–130.0721%30 May →
inferno16–130.0118%30 May →
dust213–5-0.0316%26 May →
ancient13–70.0418%26 May →
mirage13–70.0511%21 May →
cache13–10-0.0517%30 Apr →
cache13–30.0011%30 Apr →
cache11–13-0.0817%30 Apr →
mirage13–80.0213%25 Apr →
inferno12–120.0413%20 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0016%17 Apr →
nuke13–90.0715%17 Apr →
anubis13–70.0110%3 Apr →
ancient13–90.0320%1 Apr →
dust213–110.0118%31 Mar →
mirage1–13-0.0415%22 Mar →
inferno2–90.0723%21 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0115%19 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.026%18 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0710%18 Mar →
nuke13–10-0.0018%18 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0714%16 Mar →
nuke13–90.028%16 Mar →
dust24–130.0124%15 Mar →
italy6–13-0.038%15 Mar →
office13–11-0.0213%15 Mar →
inferno13–70.0315%15 Mar →
overpass12–120.0219%14 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0115%14 Mar →
ancient16–120.0322%11 Mar →
nuke13–5-0.0513%11 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0128%10 Mar →
overpass4–13-0.0323%10 Mar →
inferno9–130.0112%10 Mar →
nuke13–7-0.0117%21 Feb →
ancient13–90.0313%21 Feb →
anubis13–40.078%21 Feb →
dust27–130.0023%14 Feb →
nuke13–00.0715%14 Feb →
ancient13–16-0.0417%14 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0116%13 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.096%12 Feb →
mirage6–130.0312%12 Feb →
inferno13–9-0.0618%12 Feb →
inferno13–40.1012%12 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0222%7 Feb →
mirage16–12-0.0017%7 Feb →
mirage0–5-0.0440%4 Feb →
inferno13–100.0123%26 Jan →
inferno13–9-0.0516%24 Jan →
dust211–13-0.085%24 Jan →
mirage13–110.0212%24 Jan →
nuke13–7-0.025%24 Jan →
ancient13–50.0013%23 Jan →
nuke8–130.0511%23 Jan →
inferno13–90.0227%23 Jan →
train13–11-0.008%18 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0118%18 Jan →
mirage11–20.0413%18 Jan →
nuke8–13-0.068%17 Jan →
ancient13–16-0.019%15 Jan →
nuke16–130.0510%14 Jan →
anubis10–130.0913%12 Jan →
mirage11–130.009%12 Jan →
mirage10–130.0217%11 Jan →
ancient11–130.0516%11 Jan →
ancient13–30.048%11 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.