Predator

Predator — CS2 Stats

DE76561199074371546[U:1:1114105818]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

581Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,517Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,646Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 581 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,646 +2,522 13 Jul – 27 Sept · 31 days played
15,12417,646peak 17,64613 Jul27 Sept
17,923Peak Premier in tracked matches
838Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-13

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,646
  • +993 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,522 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,354 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches49——
Win rate49%——
K/D1.10——
Headshot %54%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate56.7%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy4.5%12.2%11.3%6.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.140.980.99above
Match win rate45.7%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPredatorFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER17,646 · Purple bandPEAK ELO838csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning50
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateLWWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +109ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 736ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 698ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time629ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 682ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.32Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 12 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · mirage, 22 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 24 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 16infernoWeakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC218–1338%-0.02
nukeA1811–761%0.07
dust2S1611–569%0.02
ancientC146–843%0.00
cacheA127–558%0.01
anubisB105–550%0.01
mirageB63–350%-0.02
vertigo—20–20%0.04
office—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,347Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
1,833Matches
45.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
56.7%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 3 players
4.5%Shot accuracy
4,712MVPs
595Hours (in match)
1,824Bombs planted
477Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,573dust2
2,114inferno
1,893nuke
952vertigo
626lake
546train
301cbble
154office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

46Matches
41%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
86.3ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1242%1.3116.4
Inferno850%0.9915.3
Dust2633%1.0517.8
Nuke450%0.9214.0
Anubis450%0.7611.8
Vertigo367%1.7215.0
Ancient20%1.0819.0
Train10%1.0716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
616msReaction time
16.4%T opening success
42.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
8.57HE damage / grenade
4.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.3974% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–130.0733%25 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0023%25 Sept →
cache13–70.0033%25 Sept →
nuke13–110.0115%24 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0720%24 Sept →
dust27–130.0115%24 Sept →
cache13–60.0124%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0110%23 Sept →
dust213–100.0122%23 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0425%23 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0818%22 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0426%22 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0927%21 Sept →
dust213–30.0132%21 Sept →
nuke8–80.0824%21 Sept →
dust25–130.0132%16 Sept →
dust213–80.1428%16 Sept →
anubis3–130.0020%15 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0220%15 Sept →
ancient13–90.0310%14 Sept →
dust23–00.0667%14 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0337%13 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0016%13 Sept →
inferno13–80.0627%13 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0618%12 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0211%12 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.088%12 Sept →
nuke9–60.1715%12 Sept →
nuke8–80.1833%12 Sept →
nuke9–20.2416%12 Sept →
nuke9–30.1722%12 Sept →
nuke9–00.3222%12 Sept →
nuke8–80.1225%12 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.0831%12 Sept →
nuke6–90.0032%12 Sept →
vertigo6–90.1331%12 Sept →
nuke9–40.0423%12 Sept →
vertigo4–9-0.0517%12 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0017%11 Sept →
inferno9–130.0824%5 Sept →
dust216–140.0418%5 Sept →
office6–130.0421%5 Sept →
anubis13–100.0528%5 Sept →
ancient5–130.0318%5 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0031%5 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0019%5 Sept →
inferno13–90.0318%5 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0226%24 Aug →
cache13–50.0138%24 Aug →
nuke13–20.0232%24 Aug →
ancient7–130.0032%24 Aug →
cache12–160.0215%22 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0220%22 Aug →
mirage13–70.0111%22 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0318%22 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0315%22 Aug →
nuke13–100.0529%22 Aug →
anubis13–20.0821%22 Aug →
dust213–110.0826%22 Aug →
mirage0–3-0.03100%22 Aug →
nuke9–50.0532%22 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0319%22 Aug →
ancient13–160.0222%22 Aug →
inferno13–50.0119%22 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0018%21 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0212%16 Aug →
cache13–60.0130%16 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0419%16 Aug →
nuke13–90.0015%16 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0118%15 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0120%15 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.019%15 Aug →
inferno14–160.0314%15 Aug →
cache13–30.0423%15 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0533%15 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0141%15 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0526%8 Aug →
inferno12–160.0124%6 Aug →
ancient3–130.0134%6 Aug →
ancient3–130.0035%6 Aug →
anubis13–160.0133%5 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0224%5 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0325%5 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0324%5 Aug →
cache13–70.1224%4 Aug →
dust213–50.0431%4 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0332%4 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0221%4 Aug →
ancient13–20.0118%3 Aug →
ancient7–130.0532%2 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0228%2 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0320%2 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0331%31 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0326%31 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0220%31 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0328%30 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0267%15 Jul →
anubis13–70.0316%14 Jul →
dust213–110.0319%14 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0315%13 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.