Sneak

Sneak — CS2 Stats

NO76561199068649143[U:1:1108383415]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,181Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating22,021Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#55631 of 258134 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (31 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,181 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,021 +1,482 22 Feb – 26 Sept · 11 days played
19,53122,021peak 22,02122 Feb26 Sept
22,021Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,549Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2025-04-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,549
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 202 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-26
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-26

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,021
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,979 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-26
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSneakPREMIER22,021 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,549csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning41
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateLWWLWWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +5.0pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.1
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time609ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 681ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 3 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · overpass, 20 Feb →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 5 Feb →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 13 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 77% over 13infernoWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB199–1047%-0.02
ancientA1810–856%-0.02
infernoD185–1328%-0.02
overpassS1310–377%-0.01
dust2A106–460%-0.02
mirageD93–633%-0.02
anubisD62–433%-0.03
vertigo—32–167%-0.07
cache_b—22–0100%-0.00
train—10–10%-0.10
grail—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

986Matches
51%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
72.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4245%1.1215.4
Nuke3951%1.0715.4
Mirage3238%0.8914.2
Vertigo3070%1.1817.9
Overpass1979%1.1414.8
Anubis1735%1.0714.8
Dust21267%1.0011.8
Ancient1225%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
606msReaction time
23.2%T opening success
40.2%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
7.51HE damage / grenade
5.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4164 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.1841% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–130.0221%11 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0029%25 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0739%25 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0628%16 May →
ancient13–6-0.0321%16 May →
nuke13–7-0.0012%16 May →
inferno13–160.0126%23 Mar →
overpass13–10-0.0124%17 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0523%17 Mar →
ancient15–150.0123%17 Mar →
inferno7–130.0219%17 Mar →
dust213–70.0510%17 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0321%14 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0127%14 Mar →
ancient13–2-0.0629%13 Mar →
dust215–15-0.0614%12 Mar →
ancient13–60.0323%12 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0618%12 Mar →
nuke13–70.0521%27 Feb →
overpass13–4-0.0113%27 Feb →
dust213–16-0.0721%27 Feb →
ancient4–13-0.098%27 Feb →
nuke13–16-0.0217%27 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.1011%27 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0717%27 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0318%27 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0730%27 Feb →
overpass13–6-0.0323%27 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0723%24 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0414%24 Feb →
ancient13–60.0333%22 Feb →
inferno14–160.0226%22 Feb →
dust26–13-0.0720%22 Feb →
nuke13–100.0126%22 Feb →
overpass6–130.0145%20 Feb →
overpass13–50.0229%15 Feb →
inferno13–7-0.019%15 Feb →
ancient13–110.0130%15 Feb →
mirage9–130.0116%14 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0632%14 Feb →
overpass11–130.0221%14 Feb →
ancient13–60.0213%13 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.0714%13 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0223%13 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0216%13 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0123%13 Feb →
mirage15–15-0.0315%13 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0215%13 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0623%5 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0614%5 Feb →
vertigo13–80.0120%5 Feb →
nuke19–220.0022%5 Feb →
inferno5–130.040%23 Jan →
dust213–70.040%23 Jan →
anubis13–60.050%23 Jan →
ancient16–130.010%23 Jan →
cache_b13–60.020%23 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0523%4 Jan →
cache_b16–13-0.0227%4 Jan →
inferno13–100.0417%4 Jan →
overpass13–7-0.0311%3 Jan →
nuke19–160.0019%3 Jan →
dust213–40.0438%3 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.0925%2 Jan →
inferno4–13-0.0423%2 Jan →
vertigo2–9-0.2219%2 Jan →
anubis10–13-0.0920%30 Dec →
nuke12–120.0219%30 Dec →
overpass9–10.0122%30 Dec →
mirage12–12-0.0118%30 Dec →
inferno10–13-0.0432%30 Dec →
ancient10–13-0.1019%30 Dec →
vertigo13–70.0113%30 Dec →
inferno6–13-0.0119%7 Nov →
mirage31–27-0.0122%7 Nov →
inferno1–13-0.150%7 Nov →
inferno16–130.0325%15 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0028%5 Oct →
ancient6–130.0333%17 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0313%17 Sept →
train4–13-0.1022%12 Sept →
mirage13–30.0618%3 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0716%3 Sept →
overpass16–14-0.0314%3 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0229%29 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0410%29 Aug →
mirage13–110.0119%29 Aug →
overpass13–70.0112%29 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0325%25 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.090%22 Aug →
dust24–13-0.039%19 Aug →
overpass14–16-0.0228%19 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0915%15 Aug →
overpass13–8-0.0024%7 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.1110%16 May →
grail3–13-0.0218%16 May →
inferno4–130.0026%16 May →
dust213–5-0.0324%16 May →
nuke13–90.0112%21 Apr →
ancient16–14-0.0112%21 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.