Cr@ckWh0re

Cr@ckWh0re — CS2 Stats

SZ76561199068004590[U:1:1107738862]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,681Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,516Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,841Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87421 of 220675 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,841 +435 22 Aug16 Sept · 19 days played
17,56619,744peak 19,74422 Aug16 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 903 below peak (19,744)
  • +435 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,159 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches3036−6
Win rate60%61%−1pp
K/D1.161.05+0.11
Headshot %40%35%+5pp

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate39.9%45.8%46.8%6.9% short
Shot accuracy13.0%12.7%13.0%meets
Kill/death ratio1.081.051.06above
Match win rate42.3%45.7%46.3%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCr@ckWh0reFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,841 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning62
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateLWWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 7%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility4.9
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time566ms+78ms
first ⅓ avg 487ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 16 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 11 Sept
383msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 6 Sept
13–1Biggest win · italy, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA1811761%0.00
mirageB179853%0.04
infernoB157847%0.02
anubisB136746%0.01
dust2C125742%0.00
nukeS118373%-0.01
ancientA117464%0.01
poseidon1010%-0.11
italy110100%0.05
office1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,142Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,411Matches
42.3%Match win rate
39.9%Headshot %
13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
4,692MVPs
1,516Hours (in match)
1,081Bombs planted
578Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,679dust2
3,612inferno
1,588nuke
951vertigo
336train
56office
27italy
17lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches
62%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
65.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage475%0.7612.3
Anubis367%0.8012.0
Dust220%0.5610.0
Cache250%0.9016.5
Nuke1100%1.0019.0
Inferno1100%0.6714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
510msReaction time
52.9%T opening success
49.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
8.05HE damage / grenade
7.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.059%16 Sept
inferno13–11-0.020%16 Sept
mirage13–40.0715%16 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0513%16 Sept
inferno4–9-0.120%16 Sept
inferno7–90.0820%16 Sept
nuke6–9-0.135%16 Sept
inferno9–50.2117%16 Sept
poseidon2–9-0.1124%16 Sept
inferno9–70.0323%16 Sept
nuke9–40.0711%16 Sept
nuke9–5-0.1111%16 Sept
inferno9–30.207%16 Sept
cache2–13-0.069%14 Sept
mirage13–70.0918%14 Sept
anubis11–130.0419%14 Sept
cache13–70.1327%14 Sept
cache13–80.0311%14 Sept
mirage13–60.0440%13 Sept
dust213–6-0.0115%13 Sept
dust24–130.0215%13 Sept
nuke13–20.0617%13 Sept
cache16–19-0.0913%13 Sept
mirage13–90.1714%13 Sept
italy13–10.0525%13 Sept
dust213–80.0519%13 Sept
mirage10–130.1017%12 Sept
ancient13–80.016%12 Sept
dust23–13-0.110%12 Sept
mirage13–40.0950%11 Sept
inferno6–90.0316%10 Sept
cache7–130.0314%10 Sept
anubis13–30.059%10 Sept
ancient13–50.0517%10 Sept
mirage13–40.037%10 Sept
anubis11–130.1618%9 Sept
anubis13–70.008%9 Sept
dust211–130.0319%9 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0625%9 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0223%9 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0312%9 Sept
dust213–100.0420%9 Sept
office9–13-0.068%9 Sept
dust29–130.0419%9 Sept
dust213–40.049%9 Sept
nuke9–20.018%9 Sept
inferno5–9-0.1414%9 Sept
cache2–13-0.0912%9 Sept
cache13–11-0.0515%9 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0421%8 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0810%8 Sept
cache8–130.015%7 Sept
mirage13–30.0116%7 Sept
anubis13–60.0631%7 Sept
mirage13–10.0115%7 Sept
nuke13–70.0513%7 Sept
cache13–90.0230%7 Sept
dust210–13-0.0318%7 Sept
ancient13–6-0.035%7 Sept
inferno10–130.0817%7 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0713%7 Sept
mirage10–130.0518%6 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0117%6 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0112%6 Sept
anubis9–130.046%6 Sept
cache13–11-0.0017%6 Sept
cache13–80.0711%6 Sept
mirage5–130.067%6 Sept
nuke13–110.0020%6 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0010%5 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0211%5 Sept
cache13–5-0.002%5 Sept
ancient12–120.0612%5 Sept
inferno2–130.0915%5 Sept
cache13–110.062%5 Sept
dust216–130.0519%5 Sept
mirage8–130.0012%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.067%3 Sept
nuke10–13-0.047%2 Sept
dust23–13-0.0015%2 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0211%1 Sept
anubis13–80.0110%1 Sept
cache13–90.0718%1 Sept
cache13–80.0213%1 Sept
mirage14–160.038%31 Aug
ancient13–60.058%31 Aug
inferno13–3-0.017%31 Aug
nuke4–130.0117%31 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0217%30 Aug
nuke13–50.0116%26 Aug
ancient10–130.0615%24 Aug
anubis13–10.0311%24 Aug
cache5–13-0.047%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0022%23 Aug
cache16–14-0.0510%23 Aug
cache11–130.0315%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.097%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0814%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0317%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0215%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →