hAwk

hAwk — CS2 Stats

PT76561199065344900[U:1:1105079172]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

546Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,120Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+8Tracked matches · now 546
+10.3ppWin rate · 34.5% → 44.8%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 59 days played since 4 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,710 +410 4 Feb17 Jun · 37 days played
15,61520,534peak 20,5344 Feb17 Jun
20,534Peak Premier in tracked matches
59Days played since 2026-02-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate46.8%48.3%51.0%4.2% short
Shot accuracy3.9%13.2%13.7%9.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.08 short
Match win rate44.6%46.9%48.4%3.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhAwkFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning52
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT37576Last 10037%Win rateWWLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time587ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 19 Mar
41%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 10 Feb
352msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · cache, 14 Jul
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 44% over 16nukeWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2591636%0.01
dust2C24101442%-0.00
ancientC167944%-0.01
nukeD1441029%-0.02
anubisC73443%-0.02
infernoD62433%-0.00
cache41325%-0.04
overpass3030%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,473Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
1,294Matches
44.6%Match win rate
46.8%Headshot %
3.9%Shot accuracy
3,007MVPs
1,120Hours (in match)
1,810Bombs planted
371Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,101dust2
1,211inferno
892nuke
662vertigo
172train
13italy
10office
9ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

406Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
81.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10855%0.9715.3
Dust29445%1.0316.9
Ancient3158%0.9715.0
Anubis2871%0.9816.1
Nuke2060%0.9415.8
Inferno1953%1.1117.2
Cache1650%0.9215.9
Vertigo4100%0.7912.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
67.9%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
591msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
7.52HE damage / grenade
8.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.687% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–9-0.0410%10 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0117%9 Sept
mirage8–130.0223%4 Sept
ancient13–110.0316%4 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0116%3 Sept
ancient13–30.0324%3 Sept
nuke7–13-0.088%2 Sept
cache13–30.0723%1 Sept
cache5–13-0.084%28 Aug
dust213–10-0.0030%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0118%23 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0341%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0713%16 Jul
cache0–4-0.100%14 Jul
dust25–13-0.087%23 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0223%17 Jun
dust213–6-0.0511%17 Jun
anubis13–80.0219%16 Jun
ancient16–140.0217%12 Jun
dust28–130.0422%9 Jun
nuke13–100.0215%7 Jun
vertigo13–80.0117%7 Jun
mirage13–70.0324%1 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0710%29 May
mirage5–13-0.0317%29 May
dust210–13-0.0320%28 May
dust28–13-0.0414%23 May
mirage12–160.0321%13 May
mirage8–13-0.0125%13 May
dust215–15-0.0318%12 May
dust215–19-0.0111%11 May
cache8–13-0.048%11 May
overpass9–130.0012%9 May
anubis19–170.0511%7 May
nuke15–15-0.0616%30 Apr
mirage15–150.0318%27 Apr
dust216–140.0521%27 Apr
ancient9–130.0215%21 Apr
dust29–13-0.0127%21 Apr
dust213–6-0.0221%20 Apr
anubis15–15-0.0112%20 Apr
ancient13–110.0214%20 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0128%16 Apr
mirage13–160.0323%16 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0310%16 Apr
mirage13–60.0521%16 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0021%16 Apr
nuke4–130.0313%16 Apr
dust26–1-0.0016%15 Apr
dust213–90.0218%12 Apr
dust29–130.0112%12 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0527%12 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0115%10 Apr
nuke14–16-0.0014%10 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0819%1 Apr
dust215–15-0.0512%1 Apr
ancient5–130.0110%26 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0118%26 Mar
mirage13–6-0.057%26 Mar
anubis13–6-0.035%21 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0616%20 Mar
inferno10–130.0219%19 Mar
nuke11–130.0323%19 Mar
dust213–80.1020%19 Mar
mirage14–160.1022%18 Mar
mirage13–80.0918%7 Mar
inferno6–130.0013%7 Mar
dust213–90.0527%2 Mar
nuke2–13-0.099%25 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0215%22 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0721%20 Feb
mirage10–130.0715%20 Feb
nuke7–130.0118%19 Feb
mirage13–70.0120%19 Feb
inferno15–150.0230%18 Feb
inferno13–40.009%17 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0110%17 Feb
dust213–11-0.0420%16 Feb
nuke13–110.0411%16 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0518%16 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0312%15 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0815%14 Feb
ancient6–13-0.035%14 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0517%12 Feb
dust28–13-0.0119%11 Feb
dust24–13-0.0222%11 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0841%10 Feb
mirage12–160.0518%10 Feb
mirage4–130.0119%10 Feb
ancient1–9-0.1135%9 Feb
ancient13–80.1015%9 Feb
mirage13–90.0813%9 Feb
dust211–13-0.0418%9 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0319%9 Feb
ancient13–160.0116%9 Feb
mirage16–130.0014%9 Feb
dust212–160.0411%9 Feb
mirage3–130.0417%8 Feb
dust213–90.0516%5 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0511%4 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →