xeetstar

xeetstar — CS2 Stats

SE76561199061640555[U:1:1101374827]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

887Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
485Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,701 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 887 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 14 Dec 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,379 +4,459 14 Dec30 Dec · 21 days played
20,92026,623peak 26,62314 Dec30 Dec
26,884Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,701Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2024-12-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,701
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 50 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.3%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy0.1%13.0%13.2%13.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.061.070.12 short
Match win rate38.4%46.3%46.9%8.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxeetstarFACEITLevel 8 · 1,701 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,701csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning40
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56395Last 10056%Win rateLWWWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −7.3pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility7.2
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch5.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.0
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time576ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−4.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 5 Jan
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · palacio, 14 Oct
375msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · anubis, 8 Feb
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 14 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
146In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 20nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2016480%-0.01
mirageB178947%-0.00
anubisA148657%0.01
ancientA148657%-0.02
dust2B126650%0.01
nukeD93633%0.00
overpassC52340%-0.02
train42250%-0.03
vertigo32167%-0.02
cache_b1010%-0.06
palacio110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,390Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
1,151Matches
38.4%Match win rate
51.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
1,862MVPs
485Hours (in match)
1,221Bombs planted
342Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,456inferno
941nuke
679dust2
600vertigo
84train
3ar_baggage
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

455Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
63.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis14653%0.8912.7
Inferno10455%1.0814.1
Ancient6139%0.8413.4
Nuke3762%0.9113.0
Overpass3563%0.9514.8
Mirage3231%0.7412.4
Vertigo2544%0.7911.2
Dust21346%0.7512.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
587msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
10.47HE damage / grenade
11.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3462% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–130.0115%24 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0229%24 Jan
anubis13–100.0314%24 Jan
inferno13–5-0.0017%24 Jan
anubis13–90.0729%24 Jan
mirage4–130.020%24 Jan
dust29–130.000%24 Jan
dust213–16-0.010%24 Jan
mirage13–70.020%24 Jan
train7–13-0.040%24 Jan
mirage11–13-0.040%22 Jan
inferno13–100.0234%22 Jan
overpass14–16-0.0118%18 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0113%18 Jan
anubis7–130.0511%6 Jan
nuke9–130.0020%6 Jan
inferno13–110.0627%5 Jan
mirage13–20.0010%5 Jan
vertigo13–5-0.0118%5 Jan
inferno4–130.0526%5 Jan
train4–13-0.0117%31 Dec
cache_b4–13-0.0625%31 Dec
ancient13–7-0.0018%31 Dec
mirage13–6-0.0414%31 Dec
dust213–80.0626%31 Dec
dust213–80.0515%31 Dec
anubis13–110.0727%31 Dec
nuke13–160.0125%30 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0323%30 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0123%17 Nov
inferno13–80.0319%17 Nov
overpass2–13-0.0318%12 Nov
nuke9–130.0115%12 Nov
train13–70.0133%12 Nov
inferno13–3-0.0212%10 Nov
ancient13–80.0116%10 Nov
overpass13–6-0.0210%10 Nov
dust213–110.0015%10 Nov
mirage15–15-0.0521%9 Nov
nuke13–70.0128%9 Nov
dust213–70.0113%8 Nov
ancient16–13-0.0524%7 Nov
ancient8–13-0.0529%6 Nov
nuke12–160.0324%6 Nov
overpass13–11-0.0312%6 Nov
ancient7–13-0.109%6 Nov
dust213–100.0726%5 Nov
inferno13–9-0.0613%3 Nov
ancient8–13-0.0512%3 Nov
palacio13–110.0442%14 Oct
ancient13–9-0.0210%5 Oct
inferno16–14-0.0524%5 Oct
ancient16–130.0121%8 Jul
mirage5–13-0.060%7 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0124%12 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0610%12 Mar
train13–10-0.0929%12 Feb
nuke13–60.0519%9 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0517%8 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0115%8 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0217%6 Feb
inferno16–140.0128%6 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0424%6 Feb
mirage13–110.0728%5 Feb
ancient13–110.0316%1 Feb
mirage10–130.0024%20 Jan
dust24–13-0.0225%20 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0213%16 Jan
vertigo8–13-0.0320%16 Jan
anubis15–150.0116%16 Jan
inferno13–60.0133%16 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0122%15 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0613%15 Jan
anubis13–110.0124%12 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0515%12 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0414%11 Jan
mirage15–15-0.0727%11 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0519%10 Jan
inferno13–100.0122%10 Jan
nuke9–130.0026%9 Jan
mirage15–150.0129%8 Jan
dust28–13-0.009%8 Jan
anubis13–110.0423%6 Jan
mirage13–40.0240%6 Jan
mirage13–90.0824%5 Jan
dust213–90.0029%5 Jan
dust20–100.025%5 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0320%4 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0612%4 Jan
inferno13–90.0114%4 Jan
mirage14–16-0.0417%2 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0016%23 Dec
ancient15–150.0519%20 Dec
anubis13–9-0.058%20 Dec
mirage11–130.0122%18 Dec
anubis13–7-0.0236%18 Dec
vertigo13–10-0.0033%15 Dec
mirage13–10.0730%14 Dec
inferno13–50.0527%14 Dec
dust28–13-0.0417%14 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →