mbyy_ — CS2 Stats

76561199061456534[U:1:1101190806]✓ No bans

865Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,723Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6561 of 19674 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,004 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmbyy_FACEITLevel 10 · 2,004 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,723 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning58
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateLWLWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression6.2
Utility5.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.8
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time496ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 496ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — train 13–3
132Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
911In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 31anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA31191261%0.01
ancientB179853%0.04
nukeC135838%-0.01
dust2B126650%0.02
cacheC83538%0.00
anubisD82625%-0.00
infernoB63350%0.07
vertigo43175%0.02
train110100%0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

700Matches
54%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
83.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14156%1.2017.5
Ancient9363%1.1616.4
Nuke7851%1.1916.6
Dust27047%1.1617.6
Anubis3549%1.0616.7
Overpass3456%1.1717.9
Inferno3459%1.2919.4
Train1040%1.2017.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
87.9%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
492msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
8.36HE damage / grenade
12.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2734% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0117%28 Aug
ancient13–110.0618%27 Aug
mirage11–130.0019%26 Aug
inferno13–80.0720%26 Aug
dust28–130.0227%26 Aug
dust213–30.1423%26 Aug
cache11–13-0.0016%26 Aug
dust21–11-0.0643%26 Aug
mirage9–10.0513%26 Aug
ancient13–80.0925%26 Aug
mirage13–30.1113%26 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0513%26 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0217%25 Aug
ancient12–160.0311%24 Aug
nuke8–130.0029%24 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0320%21 Aug
mirage13–110.018%21 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0220%21 Aug
mirage2–130.0323%20 Aug
inferno13–60.1629%20 Aug
train13–30.1830%20 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0617%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0327%13 Aug
inferno11–130.0821%13 Aug
vertigo13–30.1821%13 Aug
mirage3–50.0360%13 Aug
dust216–12-0.0618%13 Aug
cache16–12-0.0613%13 Aug
nuke14–160.0026%13 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0620%12 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0116%12 Aug
mirage12–120.0732%11 Aug
inferno13–20.1135%11 Aug
ancient5–130.1132%11 Aug
dust213–80.0436%10 Aug
cache15–150.1022%8 Aug
dust28–130.0329%8 Aug
cache7–130.0525%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0135%7 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0116%7 Aug
mirage16–140.0236%7 Aug
mirage13–50.1220%7 Aug
mirage19–17-0.0121%7 Aug
dust213–50.0031%6 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1113%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.0527%6 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0116%5 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.0224%5 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0817%5 Aug
anubis13–160.0130%5 Aug
ancient13–50.1621%5 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0215%5 Aug
nuke13–160.0020%5 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0317%5 Aug
anubis10–130.0132%5 Aug
mirage13–50.0827%5 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0124%5 Aug
ancient13–30.0123%4 Aug
nuke13–80.0723%4 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0518%2 Aug
nuke8–130.0120%2 Aug
cache9–13-0.0226%1 Aug
mirage13–50.0610%1 Aug
dust26–130.0022%1 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0114%1 Aug
nuke5–130.0122%1 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0116%1 Aug
ancient11–130.0322%1 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0117%31 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0719%31 Jul
mirage5–13-0.1013%31 Jul
cache7–13-0.0724%30 Jul
ancient11–130.0018%30 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0015%29 Jul
mirage13–60.0324%29 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0420%29 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0114%29 Jul
nuke9–130.0226%29 Jul
cache13–11-0.0311%28 Jul
ancient11–130.0526%28 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0113%27 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0311%27 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0223%24 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0022%23 Jul
mirage13–110.0319%23 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0114%21 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0126%21 Jul
inferno7–130.0426%21 Jul
anubis13–90.0819%21 Jul
ancient13–40.1628%21 Jul
ancient13–60.1012%20 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0115%19 Jul
dust213–100.0431%19 Jul
mirage13–90.0118%19 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0217%19 Jul
ancient19–170.0320%19 Jul
cache7–30.0529%18 Jul
mirage12–120.0315%18 Jul
dust213–40.1428%18 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0247%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →