vvslyyyy-_-

vvslyyyy-_- — CS2 Stats

DE76561199060998084[U:1:1100732356]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,447Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,814Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4297 of 15270 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,755 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvvslyyyy-_-FACEITLevel 9 · 1,755 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,814 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning52
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateLLLWLWLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim8.1
Aggression3.1
Utility7.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.2
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time556ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+5.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–3
131Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 56% over 16anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB22111150%-0.00
ancientC2291341%0.01
dust2A169756%0.00
cacheB137654%-0.01
infernoC73443%-0.00
nukeC73443%0.01
anubisC52340%0.01
overpass3030%-0.04
shelter220100%-0.05
fachwerk110100%0.04
vertigo1010%-0.05
boulder110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

686Matches
52%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
77.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10652%1.1916.9
Mirage6656%1.1415.4
Inferno4450%1.2616.2
Dust24255%1.2315.7
Nuke3244%1.2416.9
Anubis3053%1.1515.8
Overpass1164%1.0815.4
Cache838%0.9613.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
564msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
29.6%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
9.76HE damage / grenade
10.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.35% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0114%27 Aug
ancient11–130.0223%27 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0326%26 Aug
cache13–11-0.0213%26 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0314%20 Aug
dust213–2-0.0237%20 Aug
mirage6–130.0110%20 Aug
nuke6–00.0736%20 Aug
anubis12–120.0130%18 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0220%18 Aug
cache5–130.0023%18 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0325%16 Aug
dust213–90.0623%16 Aug
dust213–70.0324%16 Aug
inferno13–10-0.019%16 Aug
inferno13–100.0550%14 Aug
fachwerk13–80.0411%10 Aug
shelter13–6-0.0121%10 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0219%9 Aug
anubis10–130.0425%5 Aug
dust28–10.0536%5 Aug
cache13–60.0122%5 Aug
ancient13–70.0124%4 Aug
dust213–80.0024%4 Aug
ancient13–20.1434%4 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0723%4 Aug
cache7–5-0.0422%30 Jul
mirage13–70.0218%30 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0715%30 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0511%30 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0313%29 Jul
anubis13–60.0223%29 Jul
dust211–13-0.0126%29 Jul
mirage13–60.0218%29 Jul
dust213–7-0.0424%29 Jul
cache2–13-0.106%29 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0031%28 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0232%28 Jul
dust213–80.0631%28 Jul
cache8–130.0138%24 Jul
ancient8–10.025%24 Jul
nuke16–130.1118%24 Jul
shelter13–4-0.0916%24 Jul
boulder13–5-0.0210%24 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1029%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0526%23 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0715%23 Jul
mirage13–20.0622%23 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0212%21 Jul
cache9–13-0.0617%21 Jul
dust216–140.0138%19 Jul
ancient7–130.0117%19 Jul
mirage13–80.0318%16 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0119%16 Jul
dust25–13-0.0433%15 Jul
cache13–80.0315%15 Jul
mirage11–130.0127%15 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0616%12 Jul
inferno11–130.0030%12 Jul
mirage13–90.0217%12 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0229%8 Jul
cache13–50.0920%8 Jul
cache13–40.0216%8 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0319%4 Jul
overpass4–13-0.0431%4 Jul
inferno13–90.0513%1 Jul
ancient8–130.0417%1 Jul
dust213–30.0525%1 Jul
overpass5–13-0.0022%28 Jun
nuke12–16-0.0515%28 Jun
mirage13–20.0514%28 Jun
dust210–13-0.033%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0119%25 Jun
mirage0–3-0.100%25 Jun
mirage0–13-0.030%25 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0211%25 Jun
mirage16–120.0121%23 Jun
dust22–13-0.0515%23 Jun
mirage8–130.0323%23 Jun
cache13–110.0114%23 Jun
nuke8–130.0025%18 Jun
ancient13–80.0323%18 Jun
ancient13–30.1520%18 Jun
ancient10–130.0226%11 Jun
dust29–13-0.0526%11 Jun
mirage7–130.0123%11 Jun
ancient6–130.0214%11 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0416%11 Jun
cache9–13-0.0421%9 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0618%7 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0114%4 Jun
mirage9–130.0029%4 Jun
dust26–130.0015%4 Jun
ancient13–90.1213%4 Jun
ancient13–10.0613%4 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0826%2 Jun
dust212–12-0.0120%31 May
cache2–130.0114%31 May
ancient10–13-0.057%31 May
overpass5–13-0.0618%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →