Chair

Chair — CS2 Stats

LB76561199055377285[U:1:1095111557]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,120Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,385Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,259Blue band · top ~32.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,259 +3,659 29 Jul – 4 Nov · 37 days played
10,60014,259peak 14,25929 Jul4 Nov
14,259Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2026-07-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,259
  • +860 over 30 days · improving
  • +797 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 741 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches3672−36
Win rate53%49%+4pp
K/D0.890.94−0.05
Headshot %45%47%−2pp

Measured 19 Oct 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; previous 17 Sep 2026 → 19 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,911), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate45.5%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy3.5%11.2%12.0%8.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.990.991.020.03 short
Match win rate44.8%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChairFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,259 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning46
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateLWLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 654ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility6.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 654ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.6
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time656ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 715ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–11 · mirage, 4 Oct →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · anubis, 2 Oct →
453msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 21 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
4–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C269–1735%-0.01
mirageB2111–1052%0.00
nukeC176–1135%-0.01
infernoB136–746%-0.03
ancientD72–529%-0.06
anubisA53–260%0.00
cacheC52–340%-0.00
office—42–250%-0.03
train—21–150%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,145Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
2,219Matches
44.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
45.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3.5%Shot accuracy
5,290MVPs
766Hours (in match)
1,250Bombs planted
476Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,619dust2
3,195nuke
2,718inferno
1,073vertigo
416train
142lake
130office
53ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

69Matches
46%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
88.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1753%1.3417.8
Dust21650%1.0217.1
Nuke1540%0.9217.6
Inferno743%1.2419.0
Cache520%0.6011.8
Anubis475%1.0415.3
Ancient333%0.7715.7
Vertigo250%1.0515.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
654msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
34.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
7.75HE damage / grenade
10.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2517° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–130.0418%11 Nov →
dust213–60.0923%4 Nov →
office3–13-0.0529%28 Oct →
office13–9-0.1014%28 Oct →
mirage13–80.0120%25 Oct →
office10–13-0.0210%24 Oct →
anubis13–100.0127%22 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0313%21 Oct →
dust213–70.0112%19 Oct →
train4–13-0.0420%16 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.159%15 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0515%14 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0222%14 Oct →
train13–8-0.0718%13 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0714%13 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0315%11 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0017%11 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0213%11 Oct →
mirage13–40.0413%11 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0122%9 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0116%9 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0119%9 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0222%8 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0517%8 Oct →
nuke22–190.0224%6 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0727%4 Oct →
mirage13–110.1015%4 Oct →
dust213–50.0523%4 Oct →
anubis13–60.0442%2 Oct →
nuke13–80.0213%2 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0317%28 Sept →
mirage13–80.0717%24 Sept →
dust219–170.0017%21 Sept →
nuke13–00.0424%20 Sept →
office13–70.0314%14 Sept →
dust212–120.0510%14 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0410%13 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0511%13 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0025%13 Sept →
mirage13–20.1014%9 Sept →
dust25–130.0324%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0320%4 Sept →
cache5–130.0314%4 Sept →
nuke7–9-0.0412%4 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0414%3 Sept →
dust23–13-0.096%3 Sept →
dust23–130.0517%3 Sept →
mirage6–130.0417%2 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0219%1 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0419%1 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0216%31 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0217%29 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0318%29 Aug →
dust211–130.0019%28 Aug →
mirage16–140.0226%27 Aug →
nuke13–50.0415%27 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0115%23 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0214%23 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0811%22 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0620%22 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0933%22 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0711%22 Aug →
inferno13–00.0110%21 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.130%21 Aug →
inferno10–130.0129%21 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0130%21 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.0520%19 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.1212%19 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.0611%17 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0711%17 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0611%16 Aug →
dust25–130.0231%16 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0218%16 Aug →
nuke7–130.0316%8 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0319%8 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0011%8 Aug →
nuke8–30.0421%8 Aug →
dust214–160.0420%7 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0514%6 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0210%6 Aug →
cache13–60.0422%6 Aug →
dust213–80.0119%6 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0419%5 Aug →
ancient13–30.016%5 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0021%5 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0412%5 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0910%3 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.035%2 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0217%2 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.036%1 Aug →
inferno16–140.0316%1 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0423%1 Aug →
dust213–80.0022%1 Aug →
mirage13–160.0115%31 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0219%31 Jul →
nuke16–12-0.0014%31 Jul →
inferno13–50.0012%30 Jul →
dust216–13-0.0110%30 Jul →
dust213–30.0410%29 Jul →
dust24–130.0117%29 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.