☣Toxified☣

☣Toxified☣ — CS2 Stats

DK76561199052811447[U:1:1092545719]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,041Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,190Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,247Purple band · top ~15.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,057 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+713Premier CS Rating · 17,534 → 18,247

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,247 +392 17 Aug – 28 Oct · 21 days played
14,70518,247peak 18,24717 Aug28 Oct
18,247Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,057Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,057
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 144 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,247
  • +1,760 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,753 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate47.1%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy9.4%12.0%12.4%3.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.021.030.04 short
Match win rate48.7%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG☣Toxified☣FACEITLevel 5 · 1,057 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,247 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,057csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning61
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–52–2Last 10046%Win rateWWWWLLWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −112ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch0.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.1
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time632ms+59ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy29.7%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 28.1% → last ⅓ avg 29.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 12 Oct →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 25 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 25 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
4–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2510–1540%0.01
nukeA1912–763%0.02
ancientA127–558%0.02
cacheA116–555%-0.01
dust2B105–550%0.03
mirageD103–730%0.00
anubisD92–722%-0.01
office—20–20%-0.04
shelter—11–0100%-0.04
vertigo—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,455Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
2,182Matches
48.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
47.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9.4%Shot accuracy
5,084MVPs
915Hours (in match)
1,929Bombs planted
583Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,659inferno
4,022nuke
2,659vertigo
2,045dust2
431train
147cbble
96office
37italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

345Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
71.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1662%1.1514.3
Inferno1258%0.9214.8
Dust21050%0.8912.5
Anubis967%0.9214.4
Vertigo850%0.7412.3
Train714%0.8613.9
Nuke450%1.0315.8
Ancient333%0.8813.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.7%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
631msReaction time
46.3%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
10.71HE damage / grenade
10.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0524%28 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0132%28 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.0125%28 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0328%28 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0024%28 Oct →
office6–13-0.0043%25 Oct →
shelter13–10-0.049%25 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0563%25 Oct →
inferno15–150.1022%25 Oct →
inferno5–130.0050%25 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0120%25 Oct →
nuke7–130.0832%25 Oct →
nuke13–90.0336%18 Oct →
ancient13–50.0545%18 Oct →
nuke13–100.0226%18 Oct →
inferno11–130.0529%18 Oct →
nuke13–20.0021%18 Oct →
inferno13–110.0423%18 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0439%17 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0862%17 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0723%12 Oct →
nuke13–70.0215%12 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0127%12 Oct →
dust213–30.2250%12 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0412%11 Oct →
inferno13–60.0341%11 Oct →
mirage8–130.0520%11 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0643%9 Oct →
cache6–130.0120%4 Oct →
nuke9–130.0313%4 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0112%4 Oct →
cache13–60.0124%30 Sept →
nuke13–80.0827%30 Sept →
nuke13–1-0.0225%30 Sept →
nuke10–130.0117%28 Sept →
inferno13–70.1132%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0226%28 Sept →
dust213–110.0518%28 Sept →
inferno13–40.0424%28 Sept →
cache13–6-0.014%27 Sept →
cache16–120.0120%27 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0436%27 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0619%27 Sept →
inferno13–70.0438%27 Sept →
mirage8–130.0016%26 Sept →
anubis13–60.0144%26 Sept →
nuke13–70.1015%26 Sept →
cache13–100.0619%26 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0022%26 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0331%26 Sept →
anubis7–130.0344%21 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0427%21 Sept →
ancient13–100.0615%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0243%20 Sept →
ancient13–50.0956%20 Sept →
nuke7–130.0136%20 Sept →
dust213–50.0513%20 Sept →
dust211–130.0622%20 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0323%20 Sept →
cache13–60.0139%20 Sept →
inferno13–110.0521%20 Sept →
ancient6–130.0146%20 Sept →
anubis12–160.0818%20 Sept →
inferno8–130.0520%20 Sept →
nuke9–130.0234%20 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0020%16 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0132%16 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0347%16 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0429%16 Sept →
ancient13–90.0744%14 Sept →
anubis11–130.0232%14 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0515%14 Sept →
office4–13-0.0840%14 Sept →
mirage10–130.0218%12 Sept →
inferno13–60.0824%12 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0331%12 Sept →
mirage13–80.1337%12 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0616%12 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0324%6 Sept →
nuke13–80.0331%6 Sept →
ancient10–130.0119%6 Sept →
inferno5–130.0229%6 Sept →
ancient9–130.0127%6 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0431%6 Sept →
nuke13–30.1122%6 Sept →
ancient13–80.0227%6 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0313%6 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0611%6 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0529%6 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0314%6 Sept →
mirage9–130.0239%6 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0132%31 Aug →
nuke13–160.0824%31 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0313%31 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0230%31 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0522%31 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0121%31 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0560%27 Aug →
ancient6–130.0230%17 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0744%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.