¤Le0nH4rdT¤

¤Le0nH4rdT¤ — CS2 Stats

DK76561199045393007[U:1:1085127279]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,790Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,248Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Sep 2026 (28 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+32Tracked matches · now 1,790
−10.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,318 +616 27 Jan – 2 Mar · 10 days played
24,70227,412peak 27,41227 Jan2 Mar
Faceit ELO: 1,552 +0 6 Sept – 28 Sept · 5 observations
1,5521,552peak 1,5526 Sept28 Sept
27,412Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,552Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-01-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches3634+2
Win rate47%50%−3pp
K/D0.750.72+0.03
Headshot %49%52%−3pp

Measured 28 Sep 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; previous 30 Aug 2026 → 28 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.1%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy9.7%13.0%13.2%3.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.111.061.07above
Match win rate37.9%46.3%46.9%9.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG¤Le0nH4rdT¤FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,552csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning53
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateLLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time612ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 15 Oct →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · overpass, 4 Feb →
461msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · nuke, 21 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 21 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 15anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2213–959%-0.01
ancientB1910–953%-0.01
infernoS1512–380%-0.01
dust2B115–645%-0.04
anubisD102–820%-0.03
cacheD82–625%-0.03
overpassS75–271%0.01
mirageA53–260%-0.01
vertigo—31–233%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,932Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,140Matches
37.9%Match win rate
51.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9.7%Shot accuracy
6,076MVPs
1,248Hours (in match)
3,273Bombs planted
750Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,867
MAC-101,912
Tec-91,794
MP91,776
FAMAS1,585

Lifetime map wins

5,514nuke
5,300inferno
3,320vertigo
1,874dust2
299train
67office
25cbble
13lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

457Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
65.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6433%0.8013.1
Inferno5659%0.9714.1
Dust25260%0.7912.2
Nuke5254%1.1115.0
Anubis4048%0.8712.7
Mirage3847%0.8413.4
Vertigo2564%1.1415.6
Overpass1155%1.1413.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
601msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
33.5%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
9.77HE damage / grenade
8.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2221% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0313%22 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0520%21 Oct →
mirage11–30.0115%21 Oct →
ancient8–130.0011%21 Oct →
inferno13–110.027%17 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0719%17 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0213%17 Oct →
nuke13–30.0810%15 Oct →
ancient11–130.0111%15 Oct →
dust29–130.0413%14 Oct →
dust219–170.0116%1 Oct →
vertigo5–13-0.0330%11 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0220%5 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0513%27 Aug →
nuke19–17-0.0414%26 Aug →
nuke13–50.0713%21 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0919%15 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0914%15 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.069%15 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0416%15 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0117%15 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0414%15 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0432%15 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0013%15 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0225%9 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0511%5 Aug →
nuke12–16-0.0030%5 Aug →
mirage16–12-0.0011%5 Aug →
mirage13–70.0317%3 Aug →
ancient13–90.0211%3 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0121%27 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0616%27 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0515%27 Jul →
ancient13–10.0117%21 Jul →
nuke13–70.0720%21 Jul →
cache16–13-0.0212%21 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0325%20 Jun →
cache10–130.0218%20 Jun →
cache7–20.0515%20 Jun →
cache10–13-0.089%20 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0530%2 Mar →
dust23–13-0.1118%2 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0130%24 Feb →
dust21–13-0.0925%24 Feb →
inferno13–3-0.037%24 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0215%24 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.014%24 Feb →
overpass13–100.0013%24 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0216%7 Feb →
anubis0–3-0.090%7 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0816%6 Feb →
overpass16–12-0.0133%5 Feb →
ancient13–50.0215%4 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0410%4 Feb →
anubis0–13-0.0825%4 Feb →
inferno13–90.0016%4 Feb →
ancient13–50.0319%4 Feb →
overpass13–40.0136%4 Feb →
nuke8–130.029%3 Feb →
inferno13–30.0310%3 Feb →
ancient6–130.018%3 Feb →
nuke13–10-0.0318%3 Feb →
ancient4–13-0.0318%29 Jan →
inferno13–20.0423%29 Jan →
anubis15–150.0015%28 Jan →
overpass9–13-0.0213%28 Jan →
anubis13–5-0.0214%28 Jan →
ancient13–4-0.0128%28 Jan →
nuke11–13-0.0720%28 Jan →
mirage2–13-0.077%28 Jan →
nuke6–1-0.0327%28 Jan →
inferno13–10-0.0117%28 Jan →
ancient13–50.0322%28 Jan →
anubis13–16-0.0516%27 Jan →
nuke15–150.0116%27 Jan →
overpass13–50.0817%27 Jan →
anubis13–30.0016%27 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0421%27 Jan →
ancient13–60.0426%27 Jan →
dust213–110.0014%27 Jan →
inferno16–14-0.0010%27 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0119%26 Jan →
ancient13–60.0214%26 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0310%26 Jan →
nuke13–90.0216%26 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0221%26 Jan →
nuke13–6-0.0120%26 Jan →
ancient13–11-0.0211%25 Jan →
inferno13–8-0.0211%25 Jan →
ancient6–13-0.0118%22 Jan →
overpass13–40.0110%22 Jan →
inferno13–80.0124%22 Jan →
nuke13–60.0327%21 Jan →
overpass9–130.0123%21 Jan →
inferno13–8-0.0121%21 Jan →
vertigo6–130.0219%21 Jan →
nuke7–130.0114%21 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.0119%21 Jan →
nuke13–7-0.0423%21 Jan →
inferno13–9-0.0222%21 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.