chicken nugget

chicken nugget — CS2 Stats

US76561199035767609[U:1:1075501881]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

800Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
670Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,568Purple band · top ~18.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 826 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 17,568 → 17,568
0Faceit ELO · 826 → 826
+61Tracked matches · now 800
−23.7ppWin rate · 60.7% → 37.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,568 +317 21 Aug – 19 Sept · 7 days played
17,25118,015peak 18,01521 Aug19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 826 +0 4 Sept – 19 Sept · 2 observations
826826peak 8264 Sept19 Sept
18,015Peak Premier in tracked matches
826Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 826
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 75 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 447 below peak (18,015)
  • +317 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,432 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.9%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy1.8%12.0%12.4%10.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.021.030.17 short
Match win rate47.7%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGchicken nuggetFACEITLevel 5 · 826 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,568 · Purple bandPEAK ELO826csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning55
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateLWLLWTWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.5
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact0.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time569ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 20 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–3 · inferno, 28 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 12 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 21 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3118–1358%-0.03
dust2C229–1341%-0.01
cacheB178–947%-0.02
infernoC135–838%-0.02
ancientS97–278%-0.02
anubisS54–180%0.02
overpass—10–10%0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.03
nuke—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

12,888Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
923Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
48.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
1.8%Shot accuracy
1,628MVPs
348Hours (in match)
1,210Bombs planted
259Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,155dust2
1,018inferno
1,014nuke
225vertigo
24train
22office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

143Matches
52%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
69.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4365%0.9413.3
Dust23250%0.7812.6
Cache2040%0.6311.6
Ancient1553%0.8312.9
Nuke1155%1.0115.4
Inferno1118%0.8415.0
Anubis1060%1.3314.9
Vertigo10%0.335.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
561msReaction time
42.0%T opening success
44.8%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
11.49HE damage / grenade
8.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.094%28 Oct →
inferno6–30.0238%28 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0513%25 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0716%25 Oct →
dust213–20.0122%24 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0513%24 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0216%24 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0211%24 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0420%24 Oct →
dust26–130.0120%24 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0928%24 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0119%21 Oct →
mirage11–5-0.0526%21 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0320%21 Oct →
cache13–40.1124%20 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0325%20 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0217%20 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0812%20 Oct →
mirage22–20-0.0311%19 Oct →
anubis13–70.0313%16 Oct →
cache8–130.0114%14 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0418%14 Oct →
mirage13–10.027%14 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0325%13 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0211%13 Oct →
dust22–130.0113%13 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.1114%13 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0714%2 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0115%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0320%1 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0611%1 Oct →
ancient13–100.0916%1 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0820%1 Oct →
dust213–20.0517%30 Sept →
cache13–50.0210%30 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0216%30 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0622%30 Sept →
dust29–130.0820%29 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0412%29 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0211%23 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0516%23 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0412%23 Sept →
overpass6–130.0517%23 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0033%23 Sept →
mirage11–130.0126%23 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0420%22 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0026%22 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0313%19 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0923%19 Sept →
mirage13–70.1022%17 Sept →
cache4–130.0220%17 Sept →
mirage13–70.0015%17 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0635%13 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0216%12 Sept →
dust20–13-0.139%12 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0014%12 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.038%12 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0615%10 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0429%9 Sept →
inferno13–110.0125%9 Sept →
cache13–3-0.029%6 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0613%3 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.114%3 Sept →
dust213–8-0.039%2 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0126%2 Sept →
mirage13–70.058%2 Sept →
inferno13–20.0021%2 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0421%2 Sept →
mirage13–70.0125%2 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.089%2 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0318%31 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0011%30 Aug →
vertigo4–13-0.039%30 Aug →
dust26–130.0322%30 Aug →
anubis13–30.0615%30 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0020%29 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.079%29 Aug →
mirage13–60.0614%28 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0812%28 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.123%27 Aug →
dust214–160.0224%26 Aug →
dust213–80.0616%26 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0817%26 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0711%26 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0511%25 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0417%24 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0316%23 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.1023%23 Aug →
cache13–6-0.028%21 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0814%21 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.065%21 Aug →
ancient13–00.0721%21 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0216%21 Aug →
anubis13–80.0819%18 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0221%18 Aug →
mirage13–30.0423%18 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0227%17 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0224%15 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0116%15 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0118%15 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.