карандаш

карандаш — CS2 Stats

76561199031675968[U:1:1071410240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

943Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,800Purple band · top ~13.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGкарандашFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,800 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning62
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–52–4Last 10044%Win rateLLLLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.2
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time499ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · boulder, 20 Sept →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · mirage, 13 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · nuke, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 21 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L8Current streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 17ancientWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC218–1338%0.01
dust2A1710–759%-0.01
anubisB147–750%-0.01
ancientD143–1121%-0.03
cacheB147–750%-0.01
nukeB105–550%0.00
infernoD93–633%-0.02
boulder—11–0100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
49%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
67.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22955%0.9012.3
Inferno2255%0.8613.3
Anubis2176%0.9713.1
Cache1850%0.9511.9
Mirage1527%0.9413.4
Nuke911%0.6411.4
Ancient450%1.0012.5
Vertigo250%1.1020.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.9%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
486msReaction time
56.1%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
9.14HE damage / grenade
9.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.457 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–13-0.0547%5 Nov →
nuke1–13-0.0227%1 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.1420%1 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0719%27 Oct →
ancient10–130.0022%26 Oct →
anubis7–130.0118%25 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0220%25 Oct →
mirage14–160.0220%24 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0224%24 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0418%24 Oct →
mirage13–160.0217%22 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0425%22 Oct →
anubis13–30.0438%21 Oct →
mirage14–160.0623%19 Oct →
nuke13–50.0425%19 Oct →
dust213–50.0227%18 Oct →
cache13–110.0424%18 Oct →
mirage13–110.0230%18 Oct →
mirage14–160.0228%18 Oct →
mirage13–60.0436%18 Oct →
ancient13–50.0019%17 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0222%17 Oct →
cache16–140.0120%17 Oct →
mirage9–130.0024%13 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0236%12 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0919%12 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.099%12 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0914%8 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0131%7 Oct →
mirage14–160.0127%7 Oct →
nuke13–90.0111%6 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0324%6 Oct →
cache4–13-0.056%4 Oct →
mirage8–130.0120%4 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0518%4 Oct →
anubis14–160.0013%4 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0517%3 Oct →
anubis13–70.0220%2 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0116%2 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.069%2 Oct →
dust213–80.0432%2 Oct →
ancient16–140.0112%2 Oct →
ancient6–130.0113%2 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0513%1 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0013%24 Sept →
nuke13–80.0219%24 Sept →
inferno15–150.0223%24 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0321%23 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0320%23 Sept →
cache13–110.0213%23 Sept →
dust213–8-0.008%23 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0111%23 Sept →
anubis13–60.0324%22 Sept →
mirage13–60.0524%22 Sept →
anubis13–100.0629%22 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0223%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0321%22 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0824%22 Sept →
inferno13–30.1225%22 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0622%22 Sept →
mirage15–150.0124%22 Sept →
nuke13–100.0928%22 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0220%22 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0714%22 Sept →
mirage13–70.0532%22 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0623%22 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0430%21 Sept →
dust213–90.0820%21 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0122%21 Sept →
anubis13–0-0.0317%21 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0324%21 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0623%21 Sept →
cache13–90.0133%21 Sept →
ancient13–20.0114%21 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0113%21 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0714%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0426%20 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.035%20 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0912%20 Sept →
dust212–120.0019%20 Sept →
boulder13–50.1222%20 Sept →
anubis13–80.0434%20 Sept →
ancient9–130.0432%20 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0637%19 Sept →
dust216–120.0237%18 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0433%16 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0515%14 Sept →
mirage13–100.0321%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0716%13 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0115%13 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0618%13 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0448%13 Sept →
cache12–00.0321%13 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0316%13 Sept →
dust28–130.0136%13 Sept →
cache13–70.0120%12 Sept →
mirage13–20.0319%12 Sept →
dust213–9-0.026%12 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0330%12 Sept →
cache11–130.0538%12 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.