LilGooseyVert — CS2 Stats

76561198153921685[U:1:193655957]

3,553Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,651Pink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7354 of 18449 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,448 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLilGooseyVertFACEITLevel 7 · 1,448 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,651 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning53
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44533Last 10044%Win rateLWLLLLWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression5.3
Utility4.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact0.2

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2191243%-0.00
nukeB2091145%-0.01
mirageC1981142%-0.01
anubisC135838%0.01
infernoS107370%-0.01
ancientD93633%-0.01
cacheC83538%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,452Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
81.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11954%1.0116.9
Ancient6841%0.9316.0
Dust26642%0.9515.7
Anubis6548%1.0616.8
Inferno5336%0.9415.9
Nuke3158%1.0517.2
Vertigo2124%1.0816.9
Overpass1457%1.0014.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
89.0%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
593msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
7.98HE damage / grenade
3.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.8821 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8625% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0711%28 Aug
cache13–110.0622%27 Aug
anubis6–130.0316%27 Aug
dust27–13-0.0419%26 Aug
mirage11–130.0516%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0417%26 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0527%26 Aug
nuke3–13-0.1027%26 Aug
cache15–150.0129%25 Aug
inferno2–13-0.1217%25 Aug
anubis10–130.0128%25 Aug
dust216–13-0.0120%24 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0020%24 Aug
dust24–13-0.0713%24 Aug
cache13–30.107%23 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0325%23 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0019%22 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0824%22 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0418%21 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0518%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0533%21 Aug
mirage10–130.0354%21 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0326%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0524%20 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0117%20 Aug
nuke9–130.0626%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0024%16 Aug
nuke13–60.0525%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.058%14 Aug
dust22–13-0.0317%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0210%13 Aug
anubis13–60.0536%13 Aug
dust213–70.0927%12 Aug
ancient13–60.0820%12 Aug
ancient13–50.0516%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0032%11 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0241%11 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0022%11 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0125%11 Aug
inferno13–20.0426%11 Aug
dust213–11-0.0423%10 Aug
inferno10–13-0.1035%10 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0426%10 Aug
ancient13–70.1119%10 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0321%9 Aug
nuke13–80.0125%9 Aug
inferno16–130.0631%9 Aug
mirage9–130.029%9 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0222%9 Aug
dust213–110.0720%8 Aug
dust27–130.0335%8 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0423%8 Aug
dust216–130.0530%7 Aug
ancient1–13-0.146%6 Aug
dust26–13-0.0818%6 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0323%6 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0431%4 Aug
dust27–13-0.0524%4 Aug
dust22–13-0.0513%2 Aug
nuke13–110.0014%1 Aug
nuke15–150.0719%1 Aug
inferno13–80.0425%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.0037%1 Aug
dust29–130.0419%1 Aug
dust210–130.0031%31 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0313%31 Jul
mirage16–120.0633%31 Jul
cache3–13-0.0620%29 Jul
dust23–13-0.0850%29 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0312%27 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0215%27 Jul
cache13–5-0.0414%27 Jul
dust213–50.0828%27 Jul
dust213–10.0717%27 Jul
nuke13–70.0412%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0014%26 Jul
nuke11–130.063%26 Jul
cache11–13-0.0920%26 Jul
dust213–90.0123%25 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0320%25 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0824%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0330%25 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0018%24 Jul
dust213–100.0126%24 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0515%24 Jul
nuke4–130.0124%24 Jul
anubis10–130.0730%24 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0720%22 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0420%22 Jul
mirage13–90.1128%22 Jul
inferno16–130.0725%22 Jul
cache3–13-0.0726%22 Jul
anubis11–130.0119%22 Jul
cache7–13-0.0820%22 Jul
anubis16–120.0117%21 Jul
anubis13–70.0319%21 Jul
dust23–13-0.0625%21 Jul
inferno13–60.0216%20 Jul
anubis13–50.0421%20 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0315%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →