L2trap

L2trap — CS2 Stats

GB76561199028838715[U:1:1068572987]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,009Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,651Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,657Purple band · top ~21.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,183 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Feb 2024 (994 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,657 -53 3 Feb – 8 Feb · 2 days played
16,65716,710peak 16,7103 Feb8 Feb
16,710Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,183Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2024-01-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,183
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 18 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 53 below peak (16,710)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,343 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate58.4%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy17.3%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.021.03above
Match win rate45.4%44.7%45.2%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGL2trapFACEITLevel 5 · 1,183 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,657 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,183csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning41
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateLLWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −6.9pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility2.0
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.1
Utility2.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time629ms+67ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–5 · vertigo, 2 Feb →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 21 Apr →
406msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · vertigo, 4 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 22 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6vertigoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2812–1643%-0.01
anubisC188–1044%0.01
nukeC167–944%0.01
ancientC135–838%-0.01
vertigoD61–517%0.02
overpassS64–267%0.02
dust2—43–175%0.01
train—42–250%0.02
inferno—41–325%-0.03
grail—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,202Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,051Matches
45.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
58.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
5,204MVPs
1,651Hours (in match)
1,459Bombs planted
608Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,572
MP91,580
Knife1,377
AUG1,310
AWP1,210

Lifetime map wins

4,880nuke
4,391inferno
1,712dust2
1,331vertigo
698train
133cbble
62office
47lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,120Matches
50%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
70.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9042%0.9415.0
Anubis6050%1.1016.2
Nuke5562%1.1515.5
Ancient4941%1.0214.4
Inferno2339%1.0315.8
Overpass2148%1.2515.4
Dust22050%0.8714.3
Vertigo1560%1.0216.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
635msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
34.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
6.31HE damage / grenade
6.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.3225% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust217–19-0.0215%12 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0917%21 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0420%18 Jan →
ancient14–160.0213%3 Jul →
grail13–110.0124%28 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0812%28 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.0511%22 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0121%18 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0816%12 Jun →
train13–60.0323%6 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.0341%24 May →
anubis5–13-0.0710%9 May →
mirage13–16-0.0127%5 May →
anubis11–13-0.0235%3 May →
train3–13-0.0223%30 Apr →
nuke13–10.038%22 Apr →
mirage13–70.0823%22 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0913%21 Apr →
dust213–80.0620%21 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0243%21 Apr →
mirage9–130.0324%20 Apr →
nuke13–30.0621%19 Apr →
train13–9-0.0124%18 Apr →
inferno23–250.0113%29 Mar →
dust213–80.0222%1 Mar →
mirage16–140.038%23 Feb →
inferno16–14-0.0411%23 Feb →
ancient4–13-0.0914%30 Dec →
anubis13–9-0.0013%30 Dec →
nuke10–13-0.0618%29 Dec →
mirage16–14-0.0014%28 Dec →
mirage11–00.0316%28 Dec →
mirage13–100.0525%28 Dec →
dust213–7-0.0216%26 Dec →
mirage5–13-0.0112%25 Dec →
train9–130.0819%25 Dec →
ancient11–130.0322%24 Dec →
mirage13–9-0.0416%23 Dec →
anubis10–130.0018%23 Dec →
anubis13–90.0918%23 Dec →
mirage3–13-0.099%15 Dec →
anubis22–20-0.0310%8 Dec →
mirage10–13-0.129%13 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0910%11 Aug →
mirage9–130.0221%25 Feb →
mirage19–150.0421%24 Feb →
vertigo4–13-0.1010%21 Feb →
vertigo9–130.0513%21 Feb →
mirage13–30.1020%21 Feb →
overpass2–13-0.0516%19 Feb →
nuke13–70.0319%19 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0321%18 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0428%18 Feb →
anubis19–170.0619%18 Feb →
mirage16–190.0117%17 Feb →
overpass14–16-0.0333%15 Feb →
anubis13–50.0116%15 Feb →
nuke10–130.0537%15 Feb →
anubis13–70.0617%14 Feb →
anubis4–130.1120%14 Feb →
overpass13–9-0.0128%14 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0427%14 Feb →
ancient13–10.1324%14 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0318%13 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0125%13 Feb →
ancient2–13-0.069%13 Feb →
overpass13–90.0415%13 Feb →
overpass13–10.1729%12 Feb →
nuke14–160.0221%12 Feb →
nuke13–50.1018%12 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0426%12 Feb →
vertigo15–15-0.0216%8 Feb →
ancient13–70.0012%8 Feb →
mirage7–130.0112%8 Feb →
ancient13–4-0.0217%7 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.0322%7 Feb →
mirage13–80.0524%7 Feb →
mirage12–160.0117%6 Feb →
ancient13–70.0435%6 Feb →
mirage13–90.0029%5 Feb →
nuke13–20.1213%5 Feb →
inferno8–8-0.0123%4 Feb →
vertigo4–13-0.0313%4 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0618%4 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0219%4 Feb →
nuke13–50.0922%3 Feb →
anubis13–110.0919%3 Feb →
mirage9–12-0.0241%3 Feb →
anubis11–130.0518%3 Feb →
mirage13–70.0518%3 Feb →
vertigo12–16-0.0120%3 Feb →
vertigo9–50.2018%2 Feb →
anubis12–16-0.0228%2 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0526%2 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0837%1 Feb →
mirage8–130.0015%31 Jan →
ancient4–13-0.0115%29 Jan →
ancient4–13-0.0921%29 Jan →
nuke13–50.0324%29 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0316%28 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.