Sippin Juice 4 Lyfe — CS2 Stats
76561199015617721[U:1:1055351993]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 57.8% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 11.3% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.08 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 55.1% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 96% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
CT openings. 72% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 72% on CT to 46% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 8.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 37 | 25–12 | 68% | 0.07 | |
| S | 16 | 12–4 | 75% | 0.04 | |
| A | 11 | 6–5 | 55% | 0.08 | |
| C | 10 | 4–6 | 40% | -0.01 | |
| S | 5 | 5–0 | 100% | 0.06 | |
| eldorado | S | 5 | 4–1 | 80% | 0.14 |
| poseidon | — | 3 | 3–0 | 100% | 0.10 |
| — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.07 | |
| office | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.05 |
| boulder | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.04 |
| fachwerk | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.11 |
| shelter | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.10 |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.06 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.01 | |
| debris | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.03 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 132 | 63% | 1.07 | 15.5 |
| Dust2 | 97 | 55% | 1.17 | 15.8 |
| Ancient | 47 | 60% | 0.95 | 14.8 |
| Anubis | 41 | 56% | 1.15 | 15.1 |
| Nuke | 33 | 42% | 1.14 | 16.7 |
| Inferno | 23 | 48% | 1.06 | 16.7 |
| Overpass | 14 | 29% | 1.03 | 17.6 |
| Train | 9 | 89% | 1.56 | 19.2 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16–12 | 0.07 | 18% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 6–11 | 0.02 | 24% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 9–3 | 0.11 | 27% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.02 | 22% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 13% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 14% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.09 | 23% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.11 | 10% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.09 | 11% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.12 | 20% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 17% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 10% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 19% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.06 | 21% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 17% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.04 | 20% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.08 | 22% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.02 | 16% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 25% | 4 Aug → | ||
| office | 5–0 | 0.05 | 27% | 4 Aug → | |
| 13–10 | 0.14 | 19% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.05 | 21% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.09 | 22% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 18% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 20% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 27% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 19% | 28 Jul → | ||
| eldorado | 9–1 | 0.14 | 15% | 28 Jul → | |
| 13–1 | 0.13 | 21% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.07 | 23% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 9% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 9% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 25% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.10 | 19% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 15% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 17% | 18 Jul → | ||
| eldorado | 5–9 | -0.09 | 6% | 17 Jul → | |
| 13–2 | 0.08 | 10% | 17 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 11% | 16 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.01 | 26% | 16 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 8% | 16 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | -0.01 | 18% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.00 | 13% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 18% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 4–0 | 0.01 | 21% | 14 Jul → | ||
| office | 10–13 | 0.06 | 19% | 14 Jul → | |
| 10–13 | 0.04 | 15% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.10 | 0% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.06 | 8% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.11 | 21% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 1–2 | 0.16 | 50% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.04 | 20% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.12 | 19% | 12 Jul → | ||
| boulder | 9–13 | 0.04 | 19% | 12 Jul → | |
| 13–3 | 0.12 | 14% | 11 Jul → | ||
| fachwerk | 13–7 | 0.06 | 18% | 11 Jul → | |
| shelter | 13–0 | 0.14 | 21% | 11 Jul → | |
| boulder | 13–6 | 0.05 | 19% | 11 Jul → | |
| fachwerk | 13–4 | 0.15 | 16% | 11 Jul → | |
| shelter | 13–8 | 0.07 | 26% | 11 Jul → | |
| 6–9 | -0.02 | 5% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.15 | 18% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.06 | 9% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.13 | 13% | 9 Jul → | ||
| eldorado | 9–1 | 0.35 | 28% | 9 Jul → | |
| eldorado | 9–3 | 0.21 | 16% | 9 Jul → | |
| eldorado | 9–3 | 0.09 | 23% | 9 Jul → | |
| debris | 4–9 | 0.03 | 29% | 9 Jul → | |
| 13–11 | 0.07 | 18% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 6–9 | 0.08 | 11% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.07 | 20% | 4 Jul → | ||
| poseidon | 9–2 | 0.11 | 28% | 4 Jul → | |
| poseidon | 9–5 | 0.01 | 22% | 4 Jul → | |
| poseidon | 9–1 | 0.19 | 9% | 4 Jul → | |
| 2–8 | 0.10 | 25% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.13 | 19% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.03 | 1% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.09 | 27% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.14 | 15% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.08 | 14% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 32% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.11 | 17% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.16 | 17% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 2–7 | -0.07 | 14% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 19% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 15% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.11 | 26% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 16% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.09 | 14% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.05 | 16% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.07 | 17% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.05 | 12% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 9–5 | 0.12 | 9% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.07 | 24% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 11% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 23% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.09 | 26% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.30 | 28% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.00 | 12% | 26 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.