09

09 — CS2 Stats

FR76561199013259137[U:1:1052993409]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,568Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,137Top 10% of 210,584 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12322 of 257635 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,127 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,137 +3,563 27 Jul – 24 Oct · 34 days played
22,46726,761peak 26,76127 Jul24 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,127 +0 30 Aug – 27 Sept · 8 observations
2,1272,127peak 2,12730 Aug27 Sept
26,761Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,127Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-07-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,127
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 373 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 624 below peak (26,761)
  • +795 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,563 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,863 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG09FACEITLevel 10 · 2,127 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,137 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,127csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning64
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–55–1Last 10044%Win rateWWWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −6.4pp headshot accuracy · +71ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 695ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time591ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 13–10 · ancient, 1 Sept →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 11 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 1–6 · inferno, 27 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 20 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB209–1145%0.03
nukeC177–1041%0.06
mirageC177–1041%0.02
dust2S139–469%-0.01
anubisD124–833%0.02
ancientB126–650%0.03
vertigo—40–40%-0.02
cache—42–250%0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

980Matches
55%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
84.7ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17459%1.1316.9
Ancient9251%1.1417.4
Inferno8756%1.1817.2
Anubis8354%0.9915.2
Dust28354%1.1116.1
Vertigo6856%1.1817.8
Nuke6252%1.1917.6
Overpass2966%1.3619.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
42.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.5%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
579msReaction time
54.0%T opening success
59.5%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
11.47HE damage / grenade
2.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4014 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–60.2029%25 Oct →
anubis13–100.0321%24 Oct →
nuke13–50.089%23 Oct →
anubis8–130.0614%23 Oct →
overpass5–9-0.048%23 Oct →
inferno9–70.1328%23 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.017%23 Oct →
inferno9–60.0015%23 Oct →
mirage13–60.1125%22 Oct →
nuke10–130.1123%21 Oct →
dust25–130.0341%21 Oct →
mirage12–120.0823%21 Oct →
nuke13–10.2638%20 Oct →
mirage13–00.0911%20 Oct →
anubis3–130.0615%20 Oct →
anubis11–130.1322%20 Oct →
inferno7–130.0819%20 Oct →
nuke10–130.0321%18 Oct →
nuke13–70.0426%18 Oct →
nuke7–90.0327%18 Oct →
inferno9–20.1025%18 Oct →
inferno5–90.0015%18 Oct →
nuke6–90.1720%18 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0017%18 Oct →
vertigo7–9-0.125%17 Oct →
nuke9–40.0024%17 Oct →
mirage13–80.0723%17 Oct →
dust23–13-0.1037%17 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0521%16 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0118%15 Oct →
ancient12–130.0219%10 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0311%10 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0629%9 Oct →
inferno13–40.0526%8 Oct →
inferno13–80.0422%2 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0133%28 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0321%27 Sept →
dust213–110.0319%27 Sept →
inferno1–6-0.0018%27 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0427%25 Sept →
nuke6–90.0330%18 Sept →
cache10–130.0824%17 Sept →
inferno4–130.0821%13 Sept →
cache7–13-0.036%12 Sept →
ancient13–110.0033%12 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0224%12 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.060%12 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0152%11 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0124%11 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0029%3 Sept →
nuke13–160.0331%1 Sept →
ancient13–100.2727%1 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0118%30 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0640%29 Aug →
nuke12–16-0.0627%29 Aug →
inferno11–130.0128%29 Aug →
anubis9–130.0817%24 Aug →
cache13–30.0923%24 Aug →
mirage5–130.0615%23 Aug →
mirage19–170.0220%23 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0632%23 Aug →
dust216–140.0724%20 Aug →
anubis13–100.0126%18 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0529%18 Aug →
inferno13–60.0825%17 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0129%17 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0414%16 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0214%16 Aug →
ancient13–80.0720%16 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0626%15 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.007%15 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0721%15 Aug →
dust216–130.0328%15 Aug →
nuke9–60.1838%13 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0917%13 Aug →
mirage2–40.0150%11 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0125%11 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0114%11 Aug →
nuke13–00.0532%11 Aug →
inferno13–90.1226%9 Aug →
ancient10–130.1417%9 Aug →
mirage13–90.0723%9 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0214%9 Aug →
inferno13–90.0226%9 Aug →
cache13–90.0533%9 Aug →
dust212–9-0.0223%9 Aug →
mirage11–130.0830%8 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0128%8 Aug →
anubis10–130.0119%8 Aug →
vertigo6–130.0230%6 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0318%3 Aug →
mirage13–100.0220%2 Aug →
inferno11–130.0321%2 Aug →
nuke6–9-0.1220%31 Jul →
vertigo10–130.1027%31 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0221%30 Jul →
vertigo1–13-0.0827%30 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0710%27 Jul →
ancient6–130.0333%27 Jul →
mirage11–130.0621%27 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.