150kg T1mmy. — CS2 Stats

FR76561199013259137[U:1:1052993409]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,474Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,820Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4279 of 50403 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,127 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning57

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–53–1Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression10.0

Utility3.1

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels4.5

Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.7

Utility3.1

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels4.5

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time552ms−79ms

first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms

Headshot accuracy24.4%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 9–6

13–0Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	23	12–11	52%	0.01
nuke	D	16	5–11	31%	0.04
inferno	C	15	6–9	40%	0.03
ancient	B	14	7–7	50%	0.02
dust2	S	13	9–4	69%	0.00
anubis	D	10	3–7	30%	0.04
cache	—	4	4–0	100%	0.07
vertigo	—	3	0–3	0%	0.01
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

930Matches

55%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

84.2ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	167	59%	1.13	16.9
Ancient	80	52%	1.13	17.3
Inferno	79	56%	1.16	17.0
Dust2	77	53%	1.13	16.3
Anubis	73	53%	0.99	15.1
Vertigo	66	58%	1.17	17.5
Nuke	60	52%	1.18	17.4
Overpass	29	66%	1.36	19.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy

38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.2%Spray accuracy

81.9%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

539msReaction time

29.6%T opening success

66.1%CT opening success

0.34Enemies flashed / flash

1.7%Flash assists

10.08HE damage / grenade

2.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.341 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.627% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–4	-0.01	18%	30 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	40%	29 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.06	27%	29 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	28%	29 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.08	17%	24 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.09	23%	24 Aug →
mirage	19–17	0.02	20%	23 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	32%	23 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.07	24%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	26%	18 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	29%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.08	25%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	29%	17 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	14%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	14%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.07	20%	16 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	26%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	7%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.07	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.03	28%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–6	0.18	38%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.09	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	2–4	0.01	50%	11 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	25%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	14%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–0	0.05	32%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.12	26%	9 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.14	17%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.07	23%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	14%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	26%	9 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.05	33%	9 Aug →
dust2	12–9	-0.02	23%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.08	30%	8 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	28%	8 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.01	19%	8 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.02	30%	6 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.03	18%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	20%	2 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.03	21%	2 Aug →
nuke	6–9	-0.12	20%	31 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	0.10	27%	31 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	21%	30 Jul →
vertigo	1–13	-0.08	27%	30 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	10%	27 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.03	33%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.06	21%	27 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.05	20%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	35%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	33%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.07	50%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.05	46%	22 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.08	18%	22 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.13	25%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	20%	22 Jul →
dust2	1–13	0.07	32%	21 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.09	32%	21 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.00	25%	21 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.04	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.02	32%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.00	24%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.06	24%	20 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	25%	20 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.03	25%	17 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	19%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	13%	17 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.06	20%	14 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.14	25%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.13	49%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.11	24%	14 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.05	31%	13 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.05	32%	11 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.04	16%	11 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	19%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	28%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.05	23%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	32%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.05	21%	10 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.06	23%	10 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.07	24%	9 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.20	29%	8 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	23%	6 Jul →
dust2	0–11	-0.14	0%	5 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.05	20%	4 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.05	21%	4 Jul →
overpass	6–13	0.01	13%	4 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.16	23%	3 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.04	31%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.12	35%	3 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.08	0%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	34%	2 Jul →
overpass	8–13	-0.05	25%	2 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.05	24%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.05	17%	1 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.07	29%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.05	25%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.08	19%	29 Jun →
nuke	5–13	0.05	14%	29 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	25%	29 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.02	21%	28 Jun →