Carpincho

Carpincho — CS2 Stats

SY76561199005127623[U:1:1044861895]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,626Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,113Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,114Blue band · top ~49% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,847 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 21 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,114 -8,593 24 May15 Sept · 10 days played
11,11419,707peak 19,70724 May15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,847 +0 2 Sept5 Sept · 2 observations
1,8471,847peak 1,8472 Sept5 Sept
19,707Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,847Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-05-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,847
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 154 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 8,593 below peak (19,707)
  • -7,711 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,886 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches179+8
Win rate53%56%−3pp
K/D0.970.87+0.10
Headshot %50%51%−1pp

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.3%48.3%51.0%meets
Shot accuracy12.4%13.2%13.7%1.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.161.071.09above
Match win rate45.9%46.9%48.4%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCarpinchoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,847 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER11,114 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,847csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning56
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48457Last 10048%Win rateTWWLWWLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −6.1pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 622 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 1073 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility1.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.6
Utility1.5
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time542ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy26.3%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 29.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–0 · vertigo, 24 Jun
100%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 22 Jul
313msFastest reaction time · 0–5 · dust2, 15 Jul
13–0Biggest win · train, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
94In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB189950%0.01
nukeC1661038%-0.00
anubisC145936%-0.02
cacheC114736%-0.02
dust2A95456%-0.01
ancientC83538%-0.04
vertigoS64267%0.06
officeA53260%-0.02
inferno220100%-0.02
train220100%0.04
overpass2020%-0.03
shelter21150%0.04
italy1010%-0.03
boulder110100%0.05
fachwerk110100%0.15
alpine110100%-0.02
poseidon110100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,248Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
4,931Matches
45.9%Match win rate
51.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12.4%Shot accuracy
14,171MVPs
1,949Hours (in match)
2,867Bombs planted
1,174Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,630
AWP9,466
MP92,247
FAMAS1,782
SSG 081,295

Lifetime map wins

6,261vertigo
5,007inferno
4,861nuke
1,584train
1,556dust2
1,390office
702cbble
463lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

489Matches
52%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
86.9ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10460%1.2619.9
Mirage9948%1.1617.3
Ancient7753%1.1317.2
Nuke5553%1.1116.5
Vertigo3272%1.6420.2
Dust22642%1.2016.9
Inferno2438%1.0314.1
Train1724%1.1818.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.3%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
536msReaction time
43.7%T opening success
57.8%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
8.72HE damage / grenade
1.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2926 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–12-0.0020%17 Sept
anubis13–90.0132%16 Sept
mirage13–40.1230%15 Sept
cache9–13-0.0819%15 Sept
mirage13–100.0317%15 Sept
nuke13–30.0233%13 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0916%9 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0519%6 Sept
office13–6-0.0024%6 Sept
office13–110.0228%2 Sept
mirage13–60.0032%30 Aug
cache12–120.0136%27 Aug
cache4–13-0.0538%27 Aug
cache13–110.0330%27 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0520%24 Aug
cache8–13-0.0118%23 Aug
ancient13–60.0327%23 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0130%21 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0626%21 Aug
dust213–11-0.1143%20 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0120%16 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0536%16 Aug
mirage16–120.0324%14 Aug
dust213–5-0.054%14 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0825%14 Aug
nuke3–7-0.0160%12 Aug
nuke13–30.0417%12 Aug
mirage7–130.0328%12 Aug
mirage13–60.0728%12 Aug
vertigo8–80.0620%12 Aug
inferno13–30.0426%12 Aug
cache4–13-0.0419%11 Aug
mirage4–130.0125%11 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0313%11 Aug
italy12–12-0.0321%11 Aug
office6–13-0.0611%11 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0118%8 Aug
train13–00.1142%7 Aug
office5–13-0.0423%7 Aug
overpass10–13-0.0236%6 Aug
ancient1–13-0.1315%3 Aug
dust213–110.0828%3 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0521%2 Aug
ancient13–110.0526%2 Aug
vertigo9–50.017%2 Aug
dust216–130.0531%28 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0455%28 Jul
dust211–80.0252%28 Jul
mirage8–130.0529%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0241%28 Jul
nuke4–130.01100%22 Jul
nuke6–130.0150%22 Jul
cache1–13-0.0342%22 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0117%22 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0217%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0016%22 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0020%22 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0826%22 Jul
dust210–13-0.0224%22 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0322%18 Jul
mirage12–120.0233%18 Jul
nuke13–60.0844%18 Jul
shelter7–130.0241%18 Jul
nuke13–10.0533%18 Jul
mirage13–70.0810%15 Jul
dust24–130.0030%15 Jul
dust20–5-0.0433%15 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0453%15 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0940%15 Jul
boulder13–60.0533%10 Jul
fachwerk13–40.1515%10 Jul
shelter13–60.0619%10 Jul
office13–10-0.0342%10 Jul
vertigo13–2-0.0019%10 Jul
cache13–30.0322%5 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0222%27 Jun
mirage12–8-0.0215%27 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0833%26 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0413%25 Jun
nuke13–70.1131%25 Jun
vertigo9–00.1821%24 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0431%23 Jun
ancient7–13-0.1036%22 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0613%21 Jun
train13–9-0.0334%17 Jun
anubis13–30.0527%17 Jun
dust22–13-0.0222%15 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0721%15 Jun
alpine13–11-0.0221%10 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0443%10 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0328%10 Jun
ancient14–160.0223%10 Jun
poseidon9–10.1325%4 Jun
vertigo13–110.1422%4 Jun
cache13–9-0.0344%1 Jun
cache13–11-0.0042%27 May
anubis13–9-0.0140%27 May
anubis7–130.0250%27 May
anubis13–3-0.0140%24 May
mirage12–120.0237%21 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →