Torttu setä

Torttu setä — CS2 Stats

FI76561199002571321[U:1:1042305593]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

450Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,711Light Blue band · top ~61.1% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+113Premier CS Rating · 8,598 → 8,711
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 29 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,711 -532 29 Mar20 Sept · 26 days played
8,39210,368peak 10,36829 Mar20 Sept
10,489Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,072Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-03-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,072
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 129 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,657 below peak (10,368)
  • +77 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,289 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 1,289 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTorttu setäPREMIER8,711 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO1,072csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning49
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47476Last 10047%Win rateWLWLTWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +5.0pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim3.1
Utility3.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch1.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 66% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning4.9
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time680ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 680ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 12–12 · mirage, 18 May
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 20 Sept
438msFastest reaction time · 8–8 · vertigo, 4 May
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 11 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 30% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2781930%-0.04
infernoC1981142%-0.05
nukeB147750%-0.03
cacheA149564%-0.03
ancientA85363%-0.04
dust2C73443%-0.03
anubisA53260%-0.06
overpass32167%-0.03
train220100%-0.03
vertigo1010%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

76Matches
53%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
52.6ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1242%0.7410.9
Ancient944%0.519.1
Inferno933%0.547.8
Cache850%0.569.8
Nuke683%0.478.2
Dust2475%0.7212.8
Anubis333%0.446.3
Vertigo333%0.448.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
26.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.4%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
668msReaction time
48.7%T opening success
37.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
9.48HE damage / grenade
2.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.0175 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.0089% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0238%20 Sept
mirage10–13-0.079%20 Sept
cache13–11-0.066%14 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0514%14 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0829%13 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0421%13 Sept
inferno0–13-0.120%13 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0723%13 Sept
cache8–13-0.0215%10 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0531%10 Sept
cache12–120.0117%6 Sept
nuke13–16-0.019%25 Aug
mirage13–90.0318%24 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0128%23 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0311%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0017%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0115%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0612%18 Aug
dust210–13-0.066%11 Aug
mirage13–6-0.113%11 Aug
cache13–90.0429%11 Aug
anubis13–5-0.1010%11 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0222%11 Aug
cache10–3-0.014%3 Aug
cache13–6-0.0313%3 Aug
cache5–13-0.116%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0429%24 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0733%23 Jul
dust29–130.017%23 Jul
nuke4–9-0.188%21 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0214%13 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0123%13 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0115%13 Jul
dust210–13-0.0221%12 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0616%12 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0321%11 Jul
dust213–7-0.0010%6 Jul
cache13–8-0.096%6 Jul
inferno8–13-0.073%6 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0312%6 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0112%5 Jul
anubis13–9-0.056%2 Jul
mirage11–13-0.112%2 Jul
inferno13–7-0.017%1 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0114%1 Jul
nuke16–14-0.012%30 Jun
nuke8–8-0.0125%30 Jun
inferno7–13-0.120%29 Jun
ancient13–3-0.013%24 Jun
inferno8–13-0.079%24 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0514%21 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0122%5 Jun
train13–7-0.0319%5 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0810%5 Jun
nuke16–140.019%4 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0210%4 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0310%4 Jun
overpass2–13-0.1114%4 Jun
mirage6–13-0.048%3 Jun
cache9–13-0.0318%3 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0426%27 May
dust24–13-0.0614%24 May
inferno13–6-0.017%24 May
mirage8–13-0.045%24 May
mirage10–13-0.039%18 May
nuke13–100.0115%18 May
ancient7–13-0.064%18 May
mirage12–120.1619%18 May
inferno13–60.0414%17 May
dust213–6-0.099%17 May
cache13–9-0.0517%17 May
nuke13–20.0112%17 May
mirage9–3-0.016%17 May
mirage12–12-0.023%16 May
train13–5-0.037%16 May
vertigo8–80.1525%4 May
cache16–13-0.0326%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0520%29 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0719%27 Apr
mirage2–13-0.070%25 Apr
cache13–3-0.0621%24 Apr
ancient9–13-0.109%24 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0520%24 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0318%20 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0828%20 Apr
anubis7–13-0.089%15 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0713%15 Apr
nuke11–13-0.039%13 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0911%13 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0114%13 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0921%2 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0810%2 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0819%30 Mar
nuke13–11-0.096%30 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0115%30 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0414%30 Mar
dust213–110.019%30 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0533%30 Mar
overpass13–80.0415%30 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0612%29 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →