-uNoSan777 — CS2 Stats

CN76561199001672527[U:1:1041406799]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,148Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

1,738Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,553Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16042 of 53913 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,522 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,553Peak Premier on CSDB

1,522Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,522
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 9 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 21,553
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,447 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,966), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	58.6%	47.0%	48.5%	above
Shot accuracy	1.9%	12.7%	13.3%	11.3% short
Kill/death ratio	1.10	1.07	1.07	above
Match win rate	32.7%	46.4%	47.0%	14.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning56

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5

Aggression7.7

Utility6.0

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.6

Utility6.0

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time505ms−114ms

first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms

Headshot accuracy21.1%+0.2%

first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — eldorado 9–2

13–1Biggest win — anubis

4Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 15mirageWeakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.01
anubis	A	15	9–6	60%	0.01
nuke	A	14	8–6	57%	0.02
cache	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
inferno	B	13	7–6	54%	-0.01
dust2	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.01
mirage	D	9	3–6	33%	0.01
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.20
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,783Lifetime kills

1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players

3,117Matches

32.7%Match win rate

58.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players

1.9%Shot accuracy

5,970MVPs

1,679Hours (in match)

1,484Bombs planted

475Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,970

M4A4 / M4A1-S11,356

AWP8,041

Desert Eagle3,837

P2000 / USP-S3,219

Glock-182,213

Galil AR1,874

MP91,425

FAMAS1,093

MAC-101,065

Lifetime map wins

3,247dust2

2,341inferno

2,142nuke

865office

752vertigo

488train

75italy

65ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

173Matches

56%Win rate

1.25Avg K/D

91.0ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	40	70%	1.46	18.8
Inferno	31	45%	1.17	17.1
Anubis	25	60%	1.34	20.4
Nuke	21	67%	1.26	19.2
Mirage	16	38%	1.09	16.6
Dust2	14	57%	1.09	16.7
Overpass	11	45%	1.07	15.0
Train	7	14%	1.15	17.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy

36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.5%Spray accuracy

85.5%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

520msReaction time

34.7%T opening success

46.6%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

7.2%Flash assists

6.55HE damage / grenade

9.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.7027% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	11–13	-0.00	27%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.09	35%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.09	16%	28 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	18%	24 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	21%	18 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	14%	18 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.01	25%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.00	25%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	43%	18 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	21%	18 Aug →
ancient	1–10	-0.04	13%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	24%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	26%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	15%	17 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	15%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.05	22%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	16%	17 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.03	16%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	29%	16 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.03	17%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.09	14%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.04	15%	15 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.01	24%	15 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.06	27%	15 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.03	32%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.07	26%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.01	29%	13 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.01	20%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	18%	13 Aug →
inferno	0–3	-0.06	0%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	27%	13 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	22%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.03	22%	10 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.09	23%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	19%	6 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.02	32%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	15%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	24%	31 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	31%	31 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	27%	31 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.02	24%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	29%	31 Jul →
eldorado	9–2	0.20	32%	28 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.02	44%	28 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	28%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	17%	27 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	26%	27 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.08	8%	27 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.01	30%	27 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.06	15%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	21%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.06	17%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.02	23%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.12	22%	14 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.01	16%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.06	27%	10 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	18%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.02	23%	10 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	22%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.06	19%	10 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.01	11%	9 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	18%	9 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.08	28%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.04	18%	9 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	17%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.06	16%	9 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	14%	8 Jul →
inferno	7–9	-0.00	20%	8 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.08	24%	8 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.07	25%	7 Jul →
office	12–12	0.00	28%	7 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	13%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	11%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.07	16%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.03	23%	3 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	17%	2 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	21%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.06	21%	29 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.02	31%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.09	32%	28 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.01	23%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.09	24%	28 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.02	21%	26 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.07	22%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.02	23%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.08	24%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.05	43%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–16	-0.03	13%	23 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.01	22%	22 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	9%	22 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.06	18%	16 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.03	24%	16 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.04	18%	16 Jun →
nuke	5–13	0.05	18%	16 Jun →
alpine	13–5	-0.08	31%	12 Jun →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	10%	12 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	19%	12 Jun →