PennyTheMaster

PennyTheMaster — CS2 Stats

76561198992052209[U:1:1031786481]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

497Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
491Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 20 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,778 +869 20 Dec4 Jan · 9 days played
15,89017,129peak 17,12920 Dec4 Jan
17,488Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,589Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2025-12-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,589
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 162 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPennyTheMasterPEAK ELO1,589csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning38
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateTWLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 694ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim3.4
Utility5.2
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning3.8
Utility5.2
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time650ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · office, 12 Feb
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · office, 20 Dec
438msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 21 Mar
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 19 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%-0.01
dust2A2213959%-0.01
anubisD1221017%-0.03
infernoS119282%-0.00
ancientD93633%-0.03
officeS96367%0.00
nukeS65183%0.04
overpass41325%-0.03
cache31233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,285Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
812Matches
51.8%Match win rate · Top 10% of tracked players
43.4%Headshot %
5.7%Shot accuracy
2,056MVPs
491Hours (in match)
1,131Bombs planted
234Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,582dust2
1,189inferno
592nuke
295train
222office
80vertigo
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

326Matches
53%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
76.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9056%1.0114.8
Dust26151%1.0014.3
Inferno4963%1.0015.7
Anubis4643%1.0216.7
Ancient4544%0.9415.1
Nuke2152%1.1817.9
Overpass967%0.8113.4
Cache367%0.618.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
27.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.7%Spray accuracy
65.2%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
653msReaction time
23.2%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
4.02HE damage / grenade
13.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.1842% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–120.0317%3 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0521%3 Jun
cache8–13-0.089%29 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0533%22 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0717%22 Apr
cache13–80.0031%22 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0218%19 Apr
inferno13–20.0328%19 Apr
dust216–12-0.0029%19 Apr
dust213–6-0.0331%19 Apr
dust213–90.0116%19 Apr
nuke13–60.0229%19 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0114%19 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0418%19 Apr
anubis9–13-0.095%16 Apr
dust213–8-0.0130%14 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0213%14 Apr
dust213–5-0.0326%14 Apr
dust28–13-0.0229%13 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0321%13 Apr
dust213–7-0.0719%13 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0314%13 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0321%13 Apr
dust213–50.0628%13 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0814%13 Apr
dust29–13-0.0413%10 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0710%10 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0418%8 Apr
anubis16–19-0.0223%7 Apr
dust213–16-0.0713%3 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0819%1 Apr
mirage13–6-0.017%1 Apr
mirage13–60.0241%1 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0011%1 Apr
dust213–4-0.0219%1 Apr
mirage13–80.0441%1 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0715%30 Mar
anubis13–40.0620%27 Mar
dust213–60.0622%26 Mar
mirage13–110.0215%24 Mar
dust24–130.0421%24 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0519%21 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0425%21 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0419%16 Mar
dust29–13-0.0214%12 Mar
dust27–13-0.0616%9 Mar
ancient13–40.0210%9 Mar
nuke13–80.1020%5 Mar
office6–13-0.0233%4 Mar
dust215–150.0229%4 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0316%2 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0317%23 Feb
anubis7–130.0226%21 Feb
mirage3–13-0.1117%21 Feb
mirage13–80.0221%19 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0418%18 Feb
mirage9–130.0529%17 Feb
anubis16–19-0.0322%16 Feb
inferno16–130.0721%16 Feb
office13–80.1221%12 Feb
mirage13–70.0310%9 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0116%5 Feb
mirage13–70.0119%4 Feb
nuke13–70.0531%4 Feb
inferno13–90.0214%3 Feb
dust211–13-0.067%3 Feb
mirage13–110.0011%3 Feb
mirage8–130.0314%28 Jan
nuke13–80.0613%20 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0912%14 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0241%13 Jan
dust216–130.0512%4 Jan
ancient10–130.0322%4 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0224%3 Jan
nuke13–100.0216%3 Jan
dust213–7-0.029%3 Jan
ancient8–13-0.109%3 Jan
office13–3-0.0541%2 Jan
office8–0-0.0110%2 Jan
overpass4–13-0.0311%2 Jan
inferno13–80.0322%28 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0411%27 Dec
inferno13–2-0.0015%27 Dec
mirage8–130.0322%27 Dec
ancient13–90.0415%27 Dec
inferno13–90.0221%27 Dec
dust26–130.0618%27 Dec
mirage13–100.0232%27 Dec
office13–20.0123%26 Dec
office12–12-0.0116%26 Dec
office13–3-0.0811%26 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0317%26 Dec
nuke10–130.0225%22 Dec
overpass10–13-0.0412%22 Dec
dust213–7-0.0218%21 Dec
dust213–100.0524%21 Dec
mirage13–40.0514%20 Dec
ancient13–11-0.0415%20 Dec
office13–70.0418%20 Dec
office4–130.0150%20 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →