tamsin

tamsin — CS2 Stats

CH76561198990547488[U:1:1030281760]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,015Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,689Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating11,559Blue band · top ~46.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+427Premier CS Rating · 11,132 → 11,559

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,559 -5,249 29 Aug – 2 Oct · 22 days played
11,13217,347peak 17,34729 Aug2 Oct
Faceit ELO: 932 +0 29 Aug – 10 Sept · 2 observations
932932peak 93229 Aug10 Sept
18,046Peak Premier in tracked matches
932Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,788 below peak (17,347)
  • -5,249 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,441 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches162——
Win rate48%——
K/D0.71——
Headshot %37%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate34.1%42.0%44.3%10.3% short
Shot accuracy0.0%9.6%11.9%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.760.981.030.27 short
Match win rate43.7%43.8%45.2%1.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Purple band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtamsinPREMIER11,559 · Blue bandPEAK ELO932csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning41
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–56–2Last 10042%Win rateLLLWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +86ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 738ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim3.2
Utility5.5
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning4.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time609ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy9.4%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 10.3% → last ⅓ avg 9.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 19 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 24 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · mirage, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 50% over 14anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C249–1538%-0.03
mirageC177–1041%-0.05
cacheC156–940%-0.04
nukeB157–847%-0.02
ancientB147–750%-0.03
infernoB105–550%-0.03
anubisD51–420%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,297Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
4,741Matches
43.7%Match win rate
34.1%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
6,241MVPs
1,689Hours (in match)
5,993Bombs planted
731Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,638
MAC-102,904
MP92,847
FAMAS2,398
MP72,356
XM10141,677

Lifetime map wins

9,936dust2
7,622inferno
4,495nuke
1,841train
638vertigo
139office
104italy
22ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

85Matches
49%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
69.7ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2552%0.7110.6
Dust22348%1.0612.9
Ancient1958%0.9214.5
Inferno838%0.8113.0
Anubis580%1.1914.8
Nuke20%0.498.0
Cache20%0.6211.0
Train10%0.295.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.3%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
69.6%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
604msReaction time
43.0%T opening success
31.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
7.68HE damage / grenade
11.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5557° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.2994% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0810%2 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0614%2 Oct →
cache11–13-0.028%2 Oct →
cache13–9-0.015%2 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0513%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0310%2 Oct →
dust213–50.0015%2 Oct →
dust26–130.049%1 Oct →
ancient10–130.024%1 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0612%1 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0313%30 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0711%30 Sept →
mirage13–20.019%30 Sept →
ancient13–70.0310%30 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.116%29 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0419%29 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0213%29 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.054%29 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.013%29 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.043%28 Sept →
cache15–15-0.037%28 Sept →
cache3–13-0.115%28 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.089%28 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.084%27 Sept →
inferno13–00.015%27 Sept →
cache13–4-0.005%27 Sept →
dust213–110.0212%27 Sept →
dust213–70.0923%27 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0210%27 Sept →
dust213–90.029%27 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.019%27 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.038%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.1014%26 Sept →
dust210–13-0.019%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.048%26 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.027%26 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0819%25 Sept →
dust210–130.0516%25 Sept →
ancient7–90.0822%25 Sept →
cache11–130.006%25 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0413%25 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0321%24 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0311%24 Sept →
nuke13–100.039%24 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0332%24 Sept →
cache13–4-0.090%24 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.016%23 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0124%22 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.038%19 Sept →
cache13–5-0.026%19 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0315%19 Sept →
nuke5–130.009%19 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0417%19 Sept →
inferno13–40.0912%19 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.049%19 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0514%18 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.1013%18 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0413%18 Sept →
dust211–13-0.078%18 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0116%18 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0912%18 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0817%18 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0714%17 Sept →
nuke13–50.026%17 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.055%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.086%16 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.059%15 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0410%15 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.036%15 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0410%15 Sept →
nuke13–30.015%15 Sept →
cache9–13-0.087%15 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0421%14 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0213%14 Sept →
cache13–11-0.088%13 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0719%13 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.064%13 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.034%13 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.1314%13 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.057%13 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0511%12 Sept →
inferno11–7-0.0811%12 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.084%12 Sept →
cache13–3-0.015%12 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0511%12 Sept →
dust213–100.0223%12 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0312%11 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.017%11 Sept →
dust28–13-0.037%11 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.077%11 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0423%11 Sept →
cache11–13-0.088%11 Sept →
nuke8–130.0111%11 Sept →
dust210–13-0.034%11 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.1012%11 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0210%11 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0916%11 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.077%11 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.084%10 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0321%10 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.