Sp1r1t0x peek

Sp1r1t0x peek — CS2 Stats

KP76561198989236371[U:1:1028970643]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

385Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,020Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidOpening Duellist
Premier CS Rating25,157Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17248 of 220443 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,116 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 385 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 17 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,157 +1,759 17 Feb10 Sept · 19 days played
21,59326,305peak 26,30517 Feb10 Sept
26,306Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,116Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-02-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,116
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 85 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,148 below peak (26,305)
  • -87 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,843 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate58.3%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy6.0%13.2%13.7%7.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.161.071.09above
Match win rate49.1%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSp1r1t0x peekFACEITLevel 9 · 1,116 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,157 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,116csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning67
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateLLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening DuellistWinning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+1.4 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim8.3
Utility4.3
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels6.8
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.7
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time587ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy27.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.4% → last ⅓ avg 27.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 18 Mar
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–1 · cache, 14 May
328msFastest reaction time · 1–1 · cache, 14 May
13–1Biggest win · cache, 7 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 48% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB21101148%0.02
mirageB21101148%0.01
nukeB20101050%0.07
dust2B168850%0.02
ancientS76186%-0.00
anubisA53260%0.02
cache43175%0.01
overpass3030%0.03
shelter21150%-0.06
vertigo110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,069Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
1,529Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
58.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
6.0%Shot accuracy
4,867MVPs
1,242Hours (in match)
1,746Bombs planted
391Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,492dust2
2,423inferno
1,492nuke
527vertigo
360train
106office
62cbble
42lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

220Matches
57%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
84.3ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5855%1.1817.7
Dust23256%1.0917.3
Inferno2157%1.2518.6
Ancient1457%1.1918.4
Anubis956%1.0516.4
Nuke580%1.4218.4
Cache450%0.9413.5
Overpass250%0.9819.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.1%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
591msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
60.1%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
6.71HE damage / grenade
11.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4142 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5281% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
shelter5–13-0.1125%11 Jul
nuke11–130.0633%9 Jul
shelter13–8-0.0144%9 Jul
cache13–10.0318%7 Jul
nuke4–130.0921%5 Jul
inferno13–60.0124%1 Jul
ancient8–130.0237%1 Jul
dust216–130.0432%29 Jun
dust213–11-0.0329%29 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0215%28 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0233%28 Jun
inferno13–30.0430%28 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0515%25 Jun
inferno8–130.0431%25 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0125%25 Jun
inferno13–50.0034%25 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0315%21 Jun
dust213–5-0.0323%20 Jun
dust213–50.0035%20 Jun
anubis13–90.0217%19 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0528%17 Jun
ancient13–100.0432%17 Jun
overpass6–130.0636%17 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0416%16 Jun
dust24–13-0.0120%15 Jun
dust25–130.1631%15 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0150%15 Jun
inferno12–120.1332%14 Jun
mirage12–30.0220%14 Jun
nuke10–130.1132%14 Jun
nuke6–130.1021%14 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0121%13 Jun
mirage13–1-0.1122%13 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0419%11 Jun
cache13–10-0.0518%10 Jun
dust211–130.0523%9 Jun
dust210–13-0.0216%9 Jun
dust27–13-0.0513%8 Jun
dust213–20.0222%8 Jun
anubis13–90.0321%7 Jun
anubis13–90.0523%7 Jun
inferno13–40.0526%7 Jun
inferno8–130.0133%7 Jun
dust216–130.0319%7 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0419%7 Jun
anubis6–130.0038%6 Jun
nuke13–110.0426%5 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0019%5 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0024%5 Jun
dust24–13-0.0216%5 Jun
overpass8–130.0322%5 Jun
inferno13–30.0520%5 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0618%5 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0426%5 Jun
mirage5–130.0412%4 Jun
nuke9–130.0520%4 Jun
inferno13–110.0624%4 Jun
inferno8–130.0822%1 Jun
mirage13–20.0925%1 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0020%31 May
mirage4–130.0326%29 May
mirage7–130.1122%28 May
mirage2–130.0027%28 May
inferno13–8-0.0618%28 May
mirage1–13-0.0730%28 May
ancient16–140.0119%27 May
cache4–130.0021%27 May
inferno6–13-0.0032%27 May
dust213–7-0.0119%27 May
mirage12–120.0719%22 May
cache1–10.07100%14 May
nuke13–110.0818%13 May
mirage13–50.0149%10 May
nuke13–100.0316%7 Apr
nuke13–30.1826%27 Mar
dust213–100.1230%22 Mar
nuke7–130.1433%22 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0715%21 Mar
nuke13–100.0327%21 Mar
mirage13–90.1030%19 Mar
inferno13–60.0619%19 Mar
mirage12–120.0718%18 Mar
inferno6–130.1025%18 Mar
nuke13–70.2027%18 Mar
dust212–120.1122%16 Mar
inferno5–130.0116%15 Mar
mirage13–110.0722%15 Mar
nuke13–50.0227%15 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0113%15 Mar
nuke13–110.1227%14 Mar
nuke13–80.0230%13 Mar
nuke9–130.0322%12 Mar
vertigo13–60.0119%12 Mar
nuke6–130.0527%11 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0535%26 Feb
mirage13–90.0113%24 Feb
nuke13–50.0425%24 Feb
anubis2–130.0132%19 Feb
dust28–130.0117%19 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0222%17 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →