neffl_

neffl_ — CS2 Stats

CL76561198989225530[U:1:1028959802]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

619Tracked matches64%Win rate2025Tracked since
661Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating2,634Grey band · top ~88.8% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSilver I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 2,634 +1,058 3 Oct – 7 Oct · 3 days played
1,5762,634peak 2,6343 Oct7 Oct
2,634Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 2,634
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 2,366 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Grey band among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,645), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerGrey band medianLight Blue band medianvs Light Blue band
Headshot rate34.9%38.2%39.9%5.1% short
Shot accuracy3.4%3.6%7.0%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.620.830.920.29 short
Match win rate34.9%40.2%42.3%7.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Light Blue band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Light Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGneffl_PREMIER2,634 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim27
Positioning50
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–38–7Last 10055%Win rateWWLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim2.7
Utility5.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 55% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 667ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 63% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.7
Positioning5.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics2.9
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact9.8

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time648ms−131ms
first ⅓ avg 780ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy9.3%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 10.2% → last ⅓ avg 9.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · anubis, 23 Jul →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 7–9 · inferno, 1 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 12–2 · anubis, 18 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 8 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2913–1645%-0.03
nukeS1712–571%-0.00
mirageA117–464%-0.04
anubisA116–555%0.00
dust2D93–633%-0.01
cacheS97–278%-0.01
vertigoC52–340%-0.01
trainS54–180%0.02
office—41–325%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,816Lifetime kills
0.62K/D
1,139Matches
34.9%Match win rate
34.9%Headshot %
3.4%Shot accuracy
1,408MVPs
329Hours (in match)
470Bombs planted
109Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,925dust2
1,056inferno
866nuke
366train
229vertigo
227office
5italy
5lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

8.9%Headshot accuracy
28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
62.9%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
667msReaction time
66.1%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
13.38HE damage / grenade
8.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 8.8674% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.4402% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–40.012%7 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0416%7 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.107%7 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0812%7 Oct →
inferno13–100.047%6 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0411%6 Oct →
anubis13–50.089%6 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.033%3 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.198%3 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0713%2 Oct →
mirage9–3-0.040%2 Oct →
mirage13–60.033%2 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0412%2 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0024%29 Sept →
cache13–110.0215%29 Sept →
nuke13–1-0.0311%28 Sept →
vertigo13–60.0310%28 Sept →
vertigo13–1-0.080%24 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0111%22 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0017%20 Sept →
anubis13–110.017%20 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0415%20 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0610%20 Sept →
nuke13–70.053%20 Sept →
inferno9–00.119%19 Sept →
inferno9–50.1012%19 Sept →
inferno9–50.0719%19 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0111%18 Sept →
anubis6–1-0.0111%18 Sept →
anubis12–2-0.060%18 Sept →
dust211–13-0.029%16 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.066%16 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.056%16 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.095%16 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.043%16 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.043%13 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.006%12 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0116%12 Sept →
inferno13–110.0417%12 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0411%12 Sept →
office12–120.013%6 Sept →
inferno9–50.0021%6 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.166%6 Sept →
office12–120.0913%2 Sept →
office13–90.069%2 Sept →
office2–13-0.060%2 Sept →
inferno7–90.1133%1 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.2120%31 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.2010%31 Aug →
cache13–9-0.1032%31 Aug →
cache13–4-0.020%29 Aug →
dust25–130.0017%28 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0518%28 Aug →
nuke9–30.0517%26 Aug →
inferno5–90.0129%26 Aug →
train13–6-0.037%16 Aug →
train13–9-0.028%16 Aug →
train4–13-0.0113%16 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0325%14 Aug →
train13–110.0512%12 Aug →
train13–50.1015%12 Aug →
inferno13–100.076%8 Aug →
mirage13–00.037%8 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0314%8 Aug →
cache13–30.076%8 Aug →
inferno13–10.022%8 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0418%6 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0413%6 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.1310%6 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.1011%5 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.1714%5 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.038%5 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.033%5 Aug →
inferno9–5-0.1033%5 Aug →
cache9–130.079%2 Aug →
vertigo12–120.057%2 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.064%2 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.002%1 Aug →
vertigo12–12-0.0416%30 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0717%30 Jul →
vertigo2–13-0.0319%29 Jul →
nuke13–90.0313%29 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.070%28 Jul →
dust210–130.0514%27 Jul →
inferno1–11-0.040%27 Jul →
nuke13–40.079%27 Jul →
dust213–6-0.007%27 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.1012%27 Jul →
dust28–130.0711%26 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.037%26 Jul →
anubis7–130.0713%25 Jul →
dust210–13-0.035%24 Jul →
anubis5–130.0114%24 Jul →
nuke4–130.053%24 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0015%24 Jul →
inferno12–50.046%23 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.038%23 Jul →
anubis13–80.1217%23 Jul →
nuke13–70.098%23 Jul →
anubis13–100.0110%23 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.