"π’π"Victor James Osimhen β CS2 Stats
NG76561198988791281[U:1:1028525553]Steam profile ββ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here β those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Purple band median | Pink band median | vs Pink band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 45.8% | 44.1% | 47.2% | 1.4% short |
| Shot accuracy | 4.0% | 11.4% | 12.7% | 8.7% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.95 | 1.03 | 1.09 | 0.13 short |
| Match win rate | 33.8% | 45.2% | 46.6% | 12.8% short |
This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms β not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere β it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0β100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate Β· +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler β Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates β how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions β it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison β
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points β deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game β the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 33% on T β the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped β moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers β no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (Γ1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 36 | 24β12 | 67% | 0.03 | |
| S | 20 | 13β7 | 65% | 0.04 | |
| A | 15 | 9β6 | 60% | 0.05 | |
| B | 15 | 8β7 | 53% | 0.03 | |
| D | 8 | 2β6 | 25% | 0.01 | |
| A | 5 | 3β2 | 60% | -0.01 | |
| β | 1 | 0β1 | 0% | 0.00 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam β visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API β a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches β stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag β the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.6371% β below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics β lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
25% win rate across 8 tracked games β your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13β9 | 0.02 | 21% | 29 Aug β | ||
| 13β11 | 0.02 | 15% | 29 Aug β | ||
| 5β13 | 0.08 | 21% | 27 Aug β | ||
| 16β14 | 0.07 | 16% | 27 Aug β | ||
| 13β7 | 0.01 | 19% | 26 Aug β | ||
| 13β10 | 0.12 | 24% | 26 Aug β | ||
| 13β4 | 0.11 | 23% | 25 Aug β | ||
| 13β5 | 0.10 | 35% | 24 Aug β | ||
| 13β5 | 0.02 | 27% | 24 Aug β | ||
| 13β16 | 0.07 | 22% | 23 Aug β | ||
| 10β13 | 0.04 | 12% | 22 Aug β | ||
| 8β13 | 0.00 | 18% | 22 Aug β | ||
| 13β3 | 0.14 | 22% | 19 Aug β | ||
| 8β13 | 0.03 | 22% | 19 Aug β | ||
| 13β9 | 0.07 | 20% | 19 Aug β | ||
| 13β3 | -0.08 | 38% | 19 Aug β | ||
| 13β6 | 0.06 | 11% | 18 Aug β | ||
| 5β13 | 0.04 | 25% | 10 Aug β | ||
| 13β10 | 0.08 | 15% | 10 Aug β | ||
| 13β11 | 0.04 | 17% | 10 Aug β | ||
| 13β6 | 0.14 | 27% | 10 Aug β | ||
| 13β11 | -0.00 | 14% | 9 Aug β | ||
| 13β3 | 0.17 | 13% | 9 Aug β | ||
| 10β13 | 0.07 | 34% | 8 Aug β | ||
| 9β13 | 0.00 | 10% | 8 Aug β | ||
| 13β11 | 0.10 | 27% | 8 Aug β | ||
| 5β13 | -0.08 | 22% | 7 Aug β | ||
| 13β3 | 0.07 | 9% | 7 Aug β | ||
| 0β3 | 0.02 | 17% | 6 Aug β | ||
| 13β4 | 0.02 | 12% | 6 Aug β | ||
| 13β5 | 0.02 | 25% | 6 Aug β | ||
| 7β13 | 0.01 | 25% | 4 Aug β | ||
| 13β8 | 0.13 | 17% | 4 Aug β | ||
| 11β13 | -0.01 | 15% | 4 Aug β | ||
| 13β6 | 0.01 | 21% | 3 Aug β | ||
| 16β14 | 0.02 | 31% | 3 Aug β | ||
| 4β13 | -0.01 | 24% | 3 Aug β | ||
| 3β13 | 0.08 | 21% | 1 Aug β | ||
| 13β4 | 0.05 | 29% | 31 Jul β | ||
| 13β11 | 0.04 | 9% | 31 Jul β | ||
| 13β7 | 0.10 | 19% | 31 Jul β | ||
| 13β6 | 0.06 | 27% | 26 Jul β | ||
| 13β4 | 0.10 | 14% | 25 Jul β | ||
| 13β3 | 0.15 | 18% | 25 Jul β | ||
| 13β11 | 0.03 | 24% | 25 Jul β | ||
| 13β7 | 0.03 | 28% | 25 Jul β | ||
| 7β13 | 0.17 | 15% | 24 Jul β | ||
| 13β4 | 0.02 | 22% | 24 Jul β | ||
| 1β13 | 0.04 | 10% | 21 Jul β | ||
| 16β13 | 0.09 | 17% | 21 Jul β | ||
| 16β13 | 0.13 | 14% | 20 Jul β | ||
| 11β13 | 0.15 | 20% | 20 Jul β | ||
| 4β13 | 0.04 | 39% | 20 Jul β | ||
| 7β13 | -0.08 | 14% | 20 Jul β | ||
| 13β11 | -0.05 | 15% | 20 Jul β | ||
| 13β8 | 0.03 | 11% | 20 Jul β | ||
| 13β7 | -0.02 | 2% | 18 Jul β | ||
| 13β9 | -0.03 | 15% | 18 Jul β | ||
| 15β15 | 0.00 | 19% | 18 Jul β | ||
| 10β13 | -0.03 | 19% | 18 Jul β | ||
| 9β13 | -0.01 | 13% | 17 Jul β | ||
| 2β13 | -0.04 | 19% | 14 Jul β | ||
| 13β9 | 0.03 | 27% | 14 Jul β | ||
| 13β8 | 0.02 | 24% | 13 Jul β | ||
| 4β13 | 0.07 | 25% | 13 Jul β | ||
| 13β7 | -0.00 | 14% | 13 Jul β | ||
| 13β8 | -0.04 | 23% | 13 Jul β | ||
| 8β13 | -0.00 | 11% | 8 Jul β | ||
| 13β4 | 0.23 | 25% | 8 Jul β | ||
| 13β4 | 0.11 | 19% | 5 Jul β | ||
| 9β13 | 0.13 | 13% | 5 Jul β | ||
| 13β9 | 0.07 | 18% | 2 Jul β | ||
| 13β8 | -0.00 | 19% | 2 Jul β | ||
| 11β13 | -0.01 | 5% | 30 Jun β | ||
| 13β3 | 0.11 | 13% | 24 Jun β | ||
| 13β5 | 0.00 | 21% | 24 Jun β | ||
| 9β13 | -0.07 | 17% | 23 Jun β | ||
| 6β13 | 0.03 | 15% | 23 Jun β | ||
| 8β13 | -0.04 | 22% | 22 Jun β | ||
| 7β13 | -0.06 | 13% | 22 Jun β | ||
| 6β13 | -0.04 | 14% | 21 Jun β | ||
| 13β9 | 0.03 | 5% | 21 Jun β | ||
| 13β10 | 0.02 | 15% | 21 Jun β | ||
| 13β4 | -0.01 | 21% | 21 Jun β | ||
| 13β16 | 0.04 | 22% | 20 Jun β | ||
| 13β9 | 0.02 | 16% | 20 Jun β | ||
| 0β13 | -0.02 | 9% | 20 Jun β | ||
| 13β7 | 0.10 | 20% | 19 Jun β | ||
| 9β13 | -0.00 | 11% | 19 Jun β | ||
| 7β13 | -0.06 | 17% | 18 Jun β | ||
| 3β13 | -0.03 | 12% | 18 Jun β | ||
| 13β6 | 0.01 | 21% | 18 Jun β | ||
| 2β13 | -0.01 | 18% | 18 Jun β | ||
| 16β12 | -0.11 | 19% | 16 Jun β | ||
| 7β13 | -0.04 | 12% | 16 Jun β | ||
| 13β5 | 0.08 | 26% | 16 Jun β | ||
| 12β16 | -0.02 | 20% | 16 Jun β | ||
| 3β13 | -0.07 | 20% | 15 Jun β | ||
| 16β12 | 0.01 | 13% | 15 Jun β | ||
| 13β11 | 0.04 | 14% | 15 Jun β |
Match data via Leetify.