TheBeefyOx

TheBeefyOx — CS2 Stats

76561198986767029[U:1:1026501301]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,271Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,391Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+17Tracked matches · now 1,271
−10.7ppWin rate · 57.1% → 46.4%

Rating over time

43Days played since 2026-07-10

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches47——
Win rate28%——
K/D1.17——
Headshot %43%——

Measured 22 Sep 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate38.1%45.7%46.8%8.7% short
Shot accuracy4.6%12.7%13.0%8.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.051.060.10 short
Match win rate44.4%45.7%46.3%1.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTheBeefyOxFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning60
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateLLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +46ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility4.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 70% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning6.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time606ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 13 Jul →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · mirage, 20 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 0–9 · eldorado, 13 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 10 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2312–1152%0.00
cacheC177–1041%0.00
anubisA1710–759%0.00
dust2C166–1038%0.01
infernoS96–367%-0.01
ancientC73–443%-0.02
nukeD62–433%0.00
vertigo—20–20%0.05
poseidon—10–10%-0.03
eldorado—10–10%-0.28
debris—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,984Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
2,007Matches
44.4%Match win rate
38.1%Headshot %
4.6%Shot accuracy
3,670MVPs
807Hours (in match)
1,700Bombs planted
539Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,192dust2
2,200office
2,006nuke
1,792inferno
743vertigo
280train
72cbble
16ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches
68%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
69.0ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1070%1.1415.5
Dust2956%1.0414.1
Ancient757%0.8011.9
Mirage786%1.0214.6
Cache786%0.9612.6
Overpass30%0.416.0
Vertigo250%1.1914.5
Nuke1100%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
602msReaction time
70.1%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
6.64HE damage / grenade
7.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7892% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–130.0122%25 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.049%25 Oct →
dust213–20.0421%25 Oct →
ancient13–50.069%25 Oct →
inferno13–80.0215%22 Oct →
mirage10–130.0013%22 Oct →
dust29–130.0321%22 Oct →
cache10–130.0314%14 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.068%8 Oct →
mirage9–130.0713%8 Oct →
mirage13–70.0810%6 Oct →
mirage13–50.0220%5 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0421%5 Oct →
dust28–130.049%4 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.048%4 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.027%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.045%2 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.028%29 Sept →
cache8–130.0127%29 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0311%29 Sept →
dust24–130.0110%29 Sept →
mirage13–40.0113%29 Sept →
anubis13–40.0015%24 Sept →
mirage13–50.0116%24 Sept →
cache12–120.0417%24 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0826%22 Sept →
inferno13–90.0111%22 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0111%22 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0410%21 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0416%21 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0117%17 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0510%16 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.106%16 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.0327%13 Sept →
eldorado0–9-0.280%13 Sept →
debris9–70.075%13 Sept →
mirage13–80.0415%10 Sept →
inferno13–30.0917%10 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0113%1 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0029%31 Aug →
anubis7–130.0017%31 Aug →
mirage13–90.0517%31 Aug →
cache11–130.058%28 Aug →
mirage13–50.0214%28 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0815%24 Aug →
mirage13–70.0532%20 Aug →
anubis13–80.057%20 Aug →
cache13–70.0427%19 Aug →
dust23–13-0.049%18 Aug →
mirage13–20.0115%18 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0218%18 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.049%13 Aug →
dust210–130.008%13 Aug →
cache13–80.025%11 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.0512%9 Aug →
dust211–13-0.028%9 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0417%6 Aug →
dust213–100.0912%6 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0119%6 Aug →
inferno13–60.0219%5 Aug →
dust29–130.0119%5 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0311%5 Aug →
mirage5–130.0312%4 Aug →
anubis13–80.0617%4 Aug →
nuke13–60.0513%4 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0415%3 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.028%3 Aug →
cache13–4-0.016%1 Aug →
dust27–30.0616%1 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0611%1 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0312%31 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.0511%31 Jul →
nuke3–130.016%31 Jul →
vertigo12–120.0627%28 Jul →
cache13–70.0613%28 Jul →
anubis13–60.0612%26 Jul →
cache13–11-0.019%26 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0316%25 Jul →
anubis13–40.034%25 Jul →
anubis9–130.0112%24 Jul →
dust213–100.0315%24 Jul →
anubis13–40.0710%24 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0111%21 Jul →
mirage8–130.0614%20 Jul →
nuke13–50.1019%20 Jul →
mirage12–120.0220%19 Jul →
dust213–3-0.0311%19 Jul →
dust22–13-0.038%18 Jul →
cache5–0-0.030%18 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0412%18 Jul →
inferno22–20-0.0213%13 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0210%13 Jul →
dust213–20.1318%13 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0113%12 Jul →
vertigo12–120.0324%12 Jul →
dust22–2-0.0629%12 Jul →
mirage13–20.0522%12 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0915%10 Jul →
anubis13–10.0211%10 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.058%10 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.