Stumbel91

Stumbel91 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198984774409[U:1:1024508681]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,737Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,554Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating9,156Light Blue band · top ~58.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 948 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Aug 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 18 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,156 -1,175 18 Jul25 Aug · 14 days played
8,94910,515peak 10,51518 Jul25 Aug
10,663Peak Premier in tracked matches
948Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 948
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 103 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,359 below peak (10,515)
  • +207 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 844 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches4
Win rate0%
K/D0.63
Headshot %62%

Measured 13 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.8%42.7%43.8%4.0% short
Shot accuracy14.8%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.900.991.020.12 short
Match win rate42.8%43.9%44.7%1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStumbel91FACEITLevel 4 · 948 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER9,156 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO948csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning52
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46531Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim4.3
Utility6.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning5.2
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time605ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 9–0 · debris, 26 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · anubis, 17 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 1 Sept
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 26 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 22mirageWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2214864%-0.01
dust2C2181338%-0.01
nukeA1710759%-0.02
mirageD1751229%-0.02
ancientA85363%-0.02
anubisD72529%0.01
cache41325%-0.01
poseidon2020%-0.12
vertigo1010%-0.24
debris110100%0.33

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,248Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
5,864Matches
42.8%Match win rate
39.8%Headshot %
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
11,900MVPs
2,554Hours (in match)
7,783Bombs planted
1,243Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,197
P9016,369
AUG5,019
SG 5535,017
AWP4,097
MAC-103,021

Lifetime map wins

13,681inferno
12,359nuke
9,100dust2
1,916vertigo
1,573train
182lake
96cbble
30safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

665Matches
49%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
68.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6754%1.0114.6
Nuke6458%0.9514.9
Dust25153%0.8413.0
Mirage4840%0.7512.2
Ancient2948%0.7812.1
Overpass2467%0.9714.5
Anubis1735%0.8513.2
Cache333%0.7010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.0%Spray accuracy
68.3%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
605msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
7.68HE damage / grenade
14.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7499% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo0–9-0.240%17 Sept
nuke4–9-0.0613%17 Sept
inferno5–90.0218%17 Sept
poseidon3–9-0.0429%17 Sept
dust215–19-0.0319%3 Sept
dust213–10-0.069%3 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0117%3 Sept
dust213–50.0216%3 Sept
dust211–13-0.0028%3 Sept
dust213–80.0223%1 Sept
dust213–100.0118%1 Sept
mirage6–13-0.058%1 Sept
poseidon6–9-0.1935%30 Aug
nuke9–50.0219%30 Aug
inferno9–60.1624%30 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0620%30 Aug
dust29–130.0019%29 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0317%29 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0429%29 Aug
nuke13–110.0024%29 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0123%28 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0419%28 Aug
inferno9–70.0113%28 Aug
dust21–13-0.0710%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0610%27 Aug
nuke13–50.0622%27 Aug
dust25–13-0.077%27 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0426%27 Aug
inferno13–100.0216%27 Aug
nuke9–50.0215%26 Aug
inferno8–8-0.1713%26 Aug
debris9–00.3319%26 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0714%25 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0413%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0412%18 Aug
anubis14–160.0019%18 Aug
anubis1–9-0.0436%17 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0112%17 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0217%17 Aug
dust213–160.0320%17 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0915%16 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0614%16 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0010%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0815%16 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0122%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0014%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0312%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.0411%15 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0513%14 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0517%14 Aug
cache4–13-0.038%14 Aug
cache13–16-0.0315%14 Aug
dust213–90.0418%12 Aug
inferno16–140.0310%12 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0017%9 Aug
mirage13–80.0115%9 Aug
ancient16–13-0.047%7 Aug
inferno13–60.0925%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.008%7 Aug
dust213–100.0818%7 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0317%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0222%6 Aug
anubis13–60.1023%4 Aug
inferno13–100.0117%4 Aug
nuke13–40.027%4 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0918%3 Aug
dust213–9-0.0221%3 Aug
inferno13–4-0.046%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0223%2 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0323%2 Aug
anubis10–130.0311%1 Aug
mirage13–70.0917%31 Jul
dust28–130.0126%31 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0025%31 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0526%26 Jul
anubis13–30.0113%26 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0214%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0114%26 Jul
cache8–13-0.0325%26 Jul
inferno13–60.0315%26 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0323%25 Jul
ancient13–4-0.018%25 Jul
dust211–13-0.0210%25 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0617%24 Jul
inferno17–19-0.0327%24 Jul
dust213–16-0.0324%24 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0912%24 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0324%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0727%24 Jul
anubis11–130.0117%23 Jul
dust213–90.0427%23 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0216%23 Jul
cache13–100.0427%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0025%20 Jul
ancient13–90.0722%20 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0621%20 Jul
dust25–130.0118%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0426%19 Jul
dust214–16-0.0415%18 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0511%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →