Arkyyyyyy

Arkyyyyyy — CS2 Stats

LI76561198980851600[U:1:1020585872]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,789Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,915Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,323Purple band · top ~23.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,323 +3,049 24 Jul – 9 Oct · 14 days played
13,05316,744peak 16,74424 Jul9 Oct
16,744Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-07-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 421 below peak (16,744)
  • +3,247 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,049 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,677 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.5%44.8%45.7%3.2% short
Shot accuracy18.7%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio2.861.031.05above
Match win rate46.5%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGArkyyyyyyFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,323 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning61
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–49–5Last 10046%Win rateLTWLWLTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −109ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 20

  • 5–12–3 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 71% on T to 53% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels7.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time559ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy26.2%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 26.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–5 · nuke, 2 Sept →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 24 Jul →
367msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 11 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC3214–1844%0.01
nukeD113–827%-0.01
cacheC104–640%0.00
vertigoC83–538%0.02
ancientA85–363%0.05
anubisS75–271%0.05
mirageA74–357%0.01
overpassS54–180%0.09
dust2A53–260%0.01
rush_001—21–150%-0.02
eldorado—20–20%-0.06
train—10–10%0.02
boulder—10–10%0.08
debris—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

408,434Lifetime kills
2.86K/D · Top 1% of Level 6 players
4,807Matches
46.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
42.5%Headshot %
18.7%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 6 players
17,028MVPs
3,119Hours (in match)
1,876Bombs planted
1,048Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47149,705
AWP73,066
Glock-1813,734
SSG 089,549
FAMAS5,688
P2503,651

Lifetime map wins

15,932inferno
3,484nuke
3,164dust2
2,706vertigo
2,061train
747cbble
228office
139italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,768Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
82.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15251%1.0416.9
Inferno13753%1.0416.3
Anubis12644%1.0217.3
Mirage10844%1.0117.0
Nuke4757%1.1017.0
Dust23450%1.0918.2
Overpass3037%1.0516.2
Vertigo2850%1.0016.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
562msReaction time
70.8%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.80HE damage / grenade
9.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–9-0.1217%11 Oct →
inferno8–80.0822%11 Oct →
inferno9–70.1037%11 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.0314%11 Oct →
inferno9–40.0639%11 Oct →
inferno5–90.049%11 Oct →
inferno8–80.0911%11 Oct →
nuke2–9-0.1638%11 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.1333%11 Oct →
overpass9–70.1319%11 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0730%9 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0121%4 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0525%4 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0616%4 Oct →
dust216–140.0629%3 Oct →
train9–130.0229%3 Oct →
vertigo7–13-0.0218%3 Oct →
rush_0015–8-0.1345%3 Oct →
boulder8–130.0820%3 Oct →
inferno4–130.0220%1 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0333%30 Sept →
inferno7–130.0231%30 Sept →
rush_0014–00.0950%30 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0125%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0229%26 Sept →
inferno5–90.0126%26 Sept →
vertigo8–80.1033%26 Sept →
overpass9–60.1018%26 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0133%23 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0727%23 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0022%23 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0417%23 Sept →
vertigo5–130.0429%23 Sept →
anubis11–130.0319%22 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0923%22 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0625%22 Sept →
inferno13–40.0716%22 Sept →
anubis13–90.0915%22 Sept →
inferno9–40.1623%22 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0421%22 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0516%13 Sept →
mirage13–70.0126%13 Sept →
mirage3–130.0126%13 Sept →
nuke3–9-0.2310%13 Sept →
ancient6–130.0924%12 Sept →
inferno16–120.0325%12 Sept →
anubis13–30.0119%12 Sept →
ancient13–40.0116%12 Sept →
nuke4–130.0324%12 Sept →
mirage13–100.0119%12 Sept →
cache13–80.0016%12 Sept →
cache6–130.0230%11 Sept →
overpass9–30.1020%11 Sept →
vertigo9–7-0.0711%11 Sept →
anubis13–40.1822%11 Sept →
cache13–60.1725%11 Sept →
nuke9–40.1450%11 Sept →
vertigo9–70.0734%11 Sept →
nuke6–90.0840%11 Sept →
inferno9–60.1836%11 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.0739%11 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1520%11 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0023%8 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.0811%8 Sept →
inferno9–40.0618%8 Sept →
vertigo4–9-0.0130%8 Sept →
inferno9–60.1329%8 Sept →
anubis16–140.0719%8 Sept →
inferno13–90.0624%8 Sept →
overpass9–50.0919%7 Sept →
overpass6–90.0431%2 Sept →
nuke9–50.1813%2 Sept →
debris3–9-0.0629%2 Sept →
inferno9–50.0730%2 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0330%1 Aug →
inferno9–4-0.0128%1 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.1913%1 Aug →
nuke9–60.0024%1 Aug →
mirage6–130.0831%30 Jul →
eldorado7–90.0144%27 Jul →
cache7–130.0747%26 Jul →
inferno11–130.0322%25 Jul →
ancient13–100.0621%25 Jul →
dust213–50.1632%25 Jul →
dust29–13-0.105%25 Jul →
eldorado3–9-0.1425%25 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0330%25 Jul →
inferno6–9-0.0413%25 Jul →
nuke5–90.0226%25 Jul →
ancient13–80.0240%25 Jul →
ancient13–70.0433%25 Jul →
ancient11–130.0624%24 Jul →
ancient13–30.1319%24 Jul →
mirage13–100.0235%24 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0458%24 Jul →
inferno6–130.0418%24 Jul →
inferno9–50.0338%24 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0628%24 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0221%24 Jul →
anubis13–100.0120%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.