WhoAsked?

WhoAsked? — CS2 Stats

US76561198980292238[U:1:1020026510]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

761Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,383Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating27,102Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6262 of 261640 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,102 +6,519 12 Oct – 12 Nov · 26 days played
20,58327,210peak 27,21012 Oct12 Nov
27,532Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 108 below peak (27,210)
  • +6,111 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,898 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.6%46.8%48.2%2.7% short
Shot accuracy12.2%13.0%13.2%1.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.271.061.07above
Match win rate53.2%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWhoAsked?FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER27,102 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim97
Positioning55
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–35–3Last 10062%Win rateWLLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.7
Utility6.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.3

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 97 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.7
Positioning5.5
Utility6.7
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time513ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 29.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 25 Oct →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 14–16 · cache, 17 Oct →
336msFastest reaction time · 1–7 · cache, 17 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 5 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6cacheWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2816–1257%0.05
dust2S2617–965%0.06
cacheC146–843%0.05
nukeS97–278%0.05
anubisS96–367%0.05
infernoA85–363%0.04
ancientS65–183%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

43,879Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
1,685Matches
53.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 8 players
45.6%Headshot %
12.2%Shot accuracy
6,264MVPs
814Hours (in match)
2,116Bombs planted
435Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,121dust2
1,851inferno
621vertigo
606nuke
313train
111office
100italy
100aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
41.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.7%Spray accuracy
88.8%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
504msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
37.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
14.5%Flash assists
8.16HE damage / grenade
7.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4675% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10.0311%12 Nov →
mirage8–130.0127%12 Nov →
dust24–130.0017%10 Nov →
dust24–130.0729%10 Nov →
nuke13–100.0828%10 Nov →
mirage13–70.0427%10 Nov →
nuke13–4-0.0115%9 Nov →
dust213–40.0925%9 Nov →
inferno13–40.0232%9 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0136%7 Nov →
cache13–100.0120%7 Nov →
mirage14–160.0418%7 Nov →
mirage6–130.0016%5 Nov →
dust213–00.1021%5 Nov →
nuke13–60.0625%5 Nov →
mirage7–130.1225%5 Nov →
dust213–30.0531%4 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0340%3 Nov →
anubis13–100.0429%2 Nov →
cache4–130.0419%2 Nov →
cache13–20.1825%1 Nov →
mirage13–40.0828%1 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.0312%1 Nov →
mirage2–13-0.0032%30 Oct →
inferno13–20.1620%30 Oct →
ancient16–140.0425%29 Oct →
mirage16–120.0535%29 Oct →
mirage13–100.0836%29 Oct →
mirage13–50.0223%29 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0623%28 Oct →
dust28–130.0121%28 Oct →
mirage13–20.0626%28 Oct →
nuke13–50.0427%28 Oct →
dust214–160.0532%28 Oct →
dust213–80.0333%28 Oct →
cache13–80.0231%28 Oct →
dust213–40.0931%27 Oct →
cache9–130.1029%27 Oct →
dust213–70.1922%27 Oct →
anubis11–130.0424%26 Oct →
mirage13–110.0933%25 Oct →
dust213–40.0126%25 Oct →
ancient3–130.0114%25 Oct →
dust213–20.2023%25 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0025%23 Oct →
mirage13–20.0531%23 Oct →
cache7–130.0532%21 Oct →
dust212–120.0235%21 Oct →
mirage7–130.1235%21 Oct →
mirage6–130.1326%20 Oct →
anubis3–130.0029%20 Oct →
mirage13–110.0927%20 Oct →
mirage13–60.1127%20 Oct →
nuke13–70.1024%19 Oct →
dust213–50.1727%19 Oct →
mirage14–160.0530%19 Oct →
mirage7–130.0544%18 Oct →
ancient13–30.0633%18 Oct →
mirage13–20.1144%18 Oct →
anubis13–20.1830%18 Oct →
cache13–90.1234%18 Oct →
dust213–50.1653%18 Oct →
mirage13–40.0732%18 Oct →
anubis13–70.1031%18 Oct →
dust213–90.0733%18 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0552%17 Oct →
cache1–7-0.0520%17 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0156%17 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0131%17 Oct →
mirage9–130.0447%17 Oct →
inferno7–130.0330%17 Oct →
dust213–20.0430%17 Oct →
anubis13–60.0622%16 Oct →
mirage13–40.0234%16 Oct →
dust213–50.1151%16 Oct →
ancient13–20.1430%16 Oct →
anubis3–130.0431%15 Oct →
cache13–90.1029%15 Oct →
cache15–150.0742%15 Oct →
nuke5–130.0124%14 Oct →
nuke13–70.0733%14 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0019%14 Oct →
mirage13–30.1331%14 Oct →
anubis13–20.0638%14 Oct →
dust25–0-0.0214%14 Oct →
ancient16–140.0224%13 Oct →
cache9–130.0140%13 Oct →
inferno13–50.1735%13 Oct →
inferno3–130.0243%13 Oct →
mirage0–3-0.070%13 Oct →
cache13–60.1334%13 Oct →
nuke13–30.0214%12 Oct →
nuke6–130.0524%12 Oct →
dust213–80.1425%12 Oct →
mirage13–40.0443%12 Oct →
inferno13–100.0332%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0628%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0729%2 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.050%2 Oct →
anubis13–1-0.0811%2 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.