hellwalker

hellwalker — CS2 Stats

76561198980137093[U:1:1019871365]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,288Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,084 → 2,084
+58Tracked matches · now 1,288
+6.7ppWin rate · 40.0% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,084 +0 29 Aug – 18 Sept · 3 observations
2,0842,084peak 2,08429 Aug18 Sept
2,084Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,084
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 416 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhellwalkerPEAK ELO2,084csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning57
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–52Last 10048%Win rateWWLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −7.5pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility7.6
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning5.7
Utility7.6
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time507ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 507ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.48Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 1 Oct →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · ancient, 4 Oct →
313msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 31 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 22anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2215–768%0.07
mirageB2211–1150%0.01
dust2A169–756%0.02
nukeD124–833%-0.03
ancientB115–645%0.00
anubisD92–722%-0.01
cacheD72–529%-0.00
overpass—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,238Matches
52%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
69.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient26758%0.9913.5
Mirage21152%0.9613.0
Anubis20850%0.9713.5
Nuke16948%1.0413.3
Dust212852%0.9313.1
Inferno2326%0.8512.0
Overpass1771%1.0112.6
Vertigo1040%0.9018.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
42.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.9%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
511msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
9.86HE damage / grenade
14.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.3712% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.1735%13 Oct →
dust213–110.0023%13 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0115%12 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0818%12 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0027%10 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0612%8 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0119%8 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0713%7 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.029%7 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0215%5 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0535%5 Oct →
mirage8–130.0516%5 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0610%5 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0128%5 Oct →
mirage13–40.0931%5 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0726%5 Oct →
dust29–130.0333%5 Oct →
mirage13–90.0022%5 Oct →
ancient13–30.1141%4 Oct →
inferno13–100.0720%4 Oct →
inferno19–160.0833%4 Oct →
dust213–90.0114%3 Oct →
inferno13–80.0819%3 Oct →
mirage13–80.0410%3 Oct →
mirage4–130.0126%2 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0625%2 Oct →
nuke9–130.0116%2 Oct →
dust213–30.0324%2 Oct →
mirage13–80.0016%2 Oct →
inferno9–10.4825%1 Oct →
inferno9–00.4032%1 Oct →
inferno9–30.2921%1 Oct →
inferno3–90.0319%1 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0521%27 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0313%27 Sept →
dust213–30.1138%26 Sept →
dust29–130.0532%26 Sept →
dust213–110.1218%26 Sept →
dust213–90.0021%26 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0313%26 Sept →
inferno9–30.1318%24 Sept →
inferno9–70.0318%24 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0123%22 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0426%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.0226%18 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0635%18 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.0328%13 Sept →
cache18–22-0.0224%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0517%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.0733%6 Sept →
anubis9–20.0633%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0018%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0428%3 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0235%3 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.017%2 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0228%2 Sept →
inferno13–30.0519%31 Aug →
ancient13–10.0115%31 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0415%30 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0623%30 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.068%29 Aug →
nuke22–20-0.0312%29 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0221%29 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0213%23 Aug →
mirage7–130.0628%22 Aug →
dust213–10.1930%22 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0022%22 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0811%22 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0417%16 Aug →
anubis13–100.0721%16 Aug →
cache6–130.0433%16 Aug →
nuke13–50.028%16 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0535%16 Aug →
cache7–130.0534%15 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0715%12 Aug →
mirage13–40.0518%12 Aug →
ancient13–110.0527%12 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0219%9 Aug →
dust26–130.0422%9 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0025%9 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0314%9 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0118%9 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0619%9 Aug →
ancient13–50.0618%9 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0119%8 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.017%1 Aug →
mirage13–160.0018%1 Aug →
inferno13–70.0310%14 Jul →
nuke13–40.0022%14 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0429%8 Jul →
overpass5–13-0.0419%8 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0123%7 Jul →
dust213–90.0119%7 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.1012%7 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0224%4 Jul →
inferno13–70.0832%4 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0118%30 Jun →
ancient13–110.0117%30 Jun →
cache2–13-0.0220%28 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0616%28 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.