mands

mands — CS2 Stats

BR76561198979927968[U:1:1019662240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,768Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,525Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,131Purple band · top ~27.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 12 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,131 +3,069 12 Jun15 Sept · 15 days played
11,96015,483peak 15,48312 Jun15 Sept
15,841Peak Premier in tracked matches
931Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-06-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 352 below peak (15,483)
  • -195 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,171 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,869 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches7
Win rate14%
K/D0.68
Headshot %53%

Measured 14 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,407), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate40.0%42.7%43.8%3.8% short
Shot accuracy16.6%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.820.991.020.20 short
Match win rate31.3%43.9%44.7%13.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmandsFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,131 · Purple bandPEAK ELO931csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning48
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46531Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.9pp headshot accuracy · +61ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility4.6
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.8
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time612ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 6–0 · dust2, 21 Jul
55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 21 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 13 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 22 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
812In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
22Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 57% over 21mirageWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26131350%-0.03
ancientA2112957%-0.03
nukeB158753%-0.04
mirageD1331023%-0.04
infernoB115645%-0.03
cacheC83538%-0.05
anubisD62433%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,666Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
7,409Matches
31.3%Match win rate
40.0%Headshot %
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
6,363MVPs
2,525Hours (in match)
3,719Bombs planted
981Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,829
AWP12,062
G3SG16,510
SG 5535,982
MP72,794

Lifetime map wins

7,503dust2
6,995vertigo
5,554nuke
4,419inferno
665train
426italy
420office
268assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

114Matches
46%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
59.0ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
6%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22040%0.599.2
Mirage2055%0.709.9
Ancient1833%0.7811.9
Nuke1656%0.7311.2
Vertigo875%0.8715.4
Anubis520%0.739.0
Train367%0.8613.7
Inferno367%0.8714.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
87.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
613msReaction time
39.1%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
7.33HE damage / grenade
12.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4513 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.0823% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke24–28-0.0613%16 Sept
inferno13–70.0427%16 Sept
inferno8–13-0.077%15 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0013%15 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0614%1 Sept
dust211–13-0.0635%1 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0312%1 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0315%1 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0511%31 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0819%31 Aug
dust213–10-0.0215%31 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0323%27 Aug
nuke5–13-0.1319%26 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0028%26 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0117%26 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0926%25 Aug
ancient17–19-0.0118%24 Aug
ancient13–50.0524%24 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0228%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.0620%23 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0018%20 Aug
dust27–13-0.0017%20 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0324%19 Aug
dust216–14-0.0317%19 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0630%13 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0420%13 Aug
mirage6–130.0137%12 Aug
dust216–130.0119%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0338%12 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0417%12 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0621%11 Aug
dust213–60.0115%11 Aug
inferno13–80.0223%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0415%10 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0319%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0626%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0917%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0335%7 Aug
cache13–9-0.0319%7 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0521%6 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0848%28 Jul
cache7–130.0125%27 Jul
dust22–13-0.0715%27 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0821%27 Jul
ancient13–80.0423%23 Jul
cache16–14-0.0511%23 Jul
nuke13–40.0015%22 Jul
dust23–13-0.0211%21 Jul
dust26–00.1129%21 Jul
ancient13–70.0316%21 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0622%20 Jul
mirage7–13-0.1019%20 Jul
dust210–13-0.0235%20 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0833%15 Jul
dust213–9-0.0524%15 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0824%15 Jul
dust216–13-0.0627%14 Jul
cache13–10-0.0828%14 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0631%14 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0029%13 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0736%8 Jul
cache10–13-0.0329%8 Jul
dust213–8-0.0137%7 Jul
mirage13–90.0121%7 Jul
nuke13–70.0318%7 Jul
dust213–7-0.0535%7 Jul
mirage13–7-0.077%7 Jul
cache20–22-0.0421%4 Jul
dust214–16-0.0222%4 Jul
nuke4–9-0.1125%3 Jul
dust213–11-0.0932%3 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0316%3 Jul
dust217–19-0.0734%2 Jul
cache1–3-0.080%2 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0715%2 Jul
dust22–13-0.0731%2 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0626%1 Jul
dust213–16-0.0720%24 Jun
ancient17–19-0.0716%24 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0530%22 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0526%22 Jun
ancient13–1-0.0115%22 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0542%21 Jun
dust213–5-0.0224%21 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0355%21 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0724%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0516%19 Jun
dust220–22-0.0520%19 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0123%18 Jun
dust213–30.0133%18 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0537%18 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0430%18 Jun
ancient7–13-0.089%18 Jun
nuke13–160.0136%17 Jun
dust26–130.0129%16 Jun
cache7–13-0.0832%16 Jun
dust213–4-0.0632%15 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0520%15 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0719%12 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0133%12 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →