Darthmay

Darthmay — CS2 Stats

US76561198979296204[U:1:1019030476]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,805Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
7,015Hours in CS60Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,775Purple band · top ~17.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−350Premier CS Rating · 18,125 → 17,775
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 16 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,775 +4,779 16 Aug18 Sept · 24 days played
11,97718,144peak 18,14416 Aug18 Sept
18,479Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-08-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 369 below peak (18,144)
  • +5,131 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,225 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches3621+15
Win rate50%67%−17pp
K/D1.051.04+0.01
Headshot %52%46%+5pp

Measured 12 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,197), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate36.4%41.3%41.9%5.5% short
Shot accuracy7.1%12.7%12.2%5.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.110.960.98above
Match win rate38.0%42.5%43.3%5.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDarthmayFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER17,775 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning60
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56413Last 10056%Win rateLWLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −43ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.0
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch0.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 30% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.0
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time564ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · train, 1 Sept
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · anubis, 10 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · mirage, 16 Sept
13–1Biggest win · train, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 50% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B27141352%-0.01
mirageA2011955%0.02
cacheA116555%0.00
nukeB105550%0.00
ancientS96367%-0.01
infernoA95456%0.00
anubisS75271%0.01
office43175%-0.01
vertigo2020%-0.06
train110100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

119,041Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 25% of Level 2 players
8,467Matches
38.0%Match win rate
36.4%Headshot %
7.1%Shot accuracy
12,787MVPs
1,828Hours (in match)
4,788Bombs planted
1,568Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,610
AWP15,750
MAC-104,647
SG 5534,233
Knife3,967
MP73,885

Lifetime map wins

11,144office
4,192inferno
4,019dust2
3,318nuke
2,818lake
2,375vertigo
1,072italy
963train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

37Matches
27%Win rate
0.59Avg K/D
79.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
57%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1436%0.547.6
Inferno714%0.5610.4
Ancient650%0.8015.0
Vertigo50%0.539.0
Overpass20%0.386.0
Anubis20%0.528.5
Dust21100%1.0011.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
557msReaction time
51.4%T opening success
30.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
1.5%Flash assists
4.43HE damage / grenade
11.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4563 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.1594% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–130.0221%18 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0513%18 Sept
mirage11–130.0513%17 Sept
cache13–70.0713%17 Sept
ancient13–50.0915%17 Sept
dust28–13-0.0023%17 Sept
dust213–110.0112%17 Sept
dust213–50.0140%17 Sept
dust27–13-0.0415%16 Sept
dust216–14-0.0219%16 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0414%16 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0524%16 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0324%16 Sept
dust25–130.0133%16 Sept
dust22–13-0.0329%15 Sept
vertigo5–13-0.0526%15 Sept
inferno9–60.1217%15 Sept
dust28–3-0.0124%15 Sept
mirage13–70.0518%15 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0221%15 Sept
ancient7–130.0521%15 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0330%15 Sept
dust213–110.0428%15 Sept
mirage13–100.046%15 Sept
mirage13–10-0.019%15 Sept
dust213–50.0522%15 Sept
mirage15–150.0215%15 Sept
cache7–13-0.0117%14 Sept
dust213–110.0124%14 Sept
mirage13–50.0423%11 Sept
anubis13–70.0322%11 Sept
inferno13–50.0629%11 Sept
dust213–4-0.0227%11 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0242%10 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0222%9 Sept
anubis11–130.0120%9 Sept
nuke13–20.1025%9 Sept
dust25–13-0.098%8 Sept
dust213–8-0.0616%8 Sept
nuke13–5-0.054%8 Sept
nuke13–40.0526%8 Sept
office13–80.0217%7 Sept
office13–6-0.0021%7 Sept
dust211–13-0.0118%7 Sept
mirage13–90.0621%7 Sept
dust26–13-0.0023%6 Sept
nuke8–130.0024%4 Sept
anubis13–110.0414%4 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0718%3 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0214%3 Sept
dust213–16-0.0118%1 Sept
cache9–13-0.0218%1 Sept
train13–10.1613%1 Sept
nuke4–90.0825%1 Sept
mirage10–130.0828%31 Aug
ancient16–13-0.014%30 Aug
cache6–13-0.0221%30 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0420%29 Aug
cache13–8-0.0315%29 Aug
dust213–20.0627%28 Aug
inferno16–140.0510%28 Aug
dust213–90.0218%28 Aug
mirage13–100.0213%28 Aug
mirage5–130.0733%27 Aug
dust215–150.0519%27 Aug
dust213–110.0211%27 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0510%26 Aug
dust213–70.0325%26 Aug
office8–13-0.0318%26 Aug
cache7–00.017%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.037%26 Aug
ancient13–30.0314%26 Aug
cache2–13-0.0428%26 Aug
cache13–60.0114%26 Aug
anubis13–60.079%26 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0412%26 Aug
dust211–130.0119%25 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0412%25 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0810%25 Aug
mirage13–90.0620%25 Aug
cache16–130.0120%25 Aug
mirage13–100.0234%25 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0822%25 Aug
office13–11-0.0316%25 Aug
nuke6–90.0410%24 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0715%24 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0728%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.0629%24 Aug
mirage13–60.0012%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.107%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0722%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0025%23 Aug
dust212–12-0.0311%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.0617%20 Aug
cache7–130.0426%19 Aug
inferno3–90.0218%18 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0321%17 Aug
mirage7–30.0421%17 Aug
anubis11–130.0124%16 Aug
dust213–10-0.0219%16 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →