CookiesandCream

CookiesandCream — CS2 Stats

PH76561198971412784[U:1:1011147056]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,936Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,587Red band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,682 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCookiesandCreamFACEITLevel 10 · 1,682 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,587 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning49
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–37–5Last 10058%Win rateLWLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −7.2pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility3.6
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.9
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time634ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy32.3%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 32.9% → last ⅓ avg 32.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 12 Nov →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 18 Sept →
430msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 4 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 21 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 47% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2513–1252%-0.01
ancientA1912–763%-0.01
anubisB178–947%-0.03
infernoA116–555%-0.02
cacheS98–189%-0.01
dust2A85–363%-0.04
nukeA53–260%-0.04
vertigo—31–233%-0.04
overpass—21–150%0.03
train—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,614Matches
52%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
65.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage52155%0.9514.2
Ancient46351%0.8813.3
Anubis42755%0.9414.2
Inferno13544%0.8413.2
Vertigo13058%0.9414.4
Overpass12362%0.9313.6
Dust210243%0.8212.8
Nuke9041%0.8513.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.0%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
640msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
8.23HE damage / grenade
4.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3632 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2714% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0327%14 Nov →
inferno16–130.0030%14 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0513%12 Nov →
mirage13–40.1436%12 Nov →
anubis13–8-0.0213%10 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0237%9 Nov →
inferno7–130.0226%9 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0526%4 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0426%4 Nov →
inferno8–130.0027%4 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0244%4 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0530%1 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0130%28 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0246%28 Oct →
ancient6–130.0132%28 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0222%27 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0435%27 Oct →
cache13–100.0337%27 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0827%25 Oct →
mirage13–80.0629%24 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.1017%23 Oct →
dust213–5-0.1119%23 Oct →
ancient5–2-0.0360%23 Oct →
inferno13–20.0329%23 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0442%23 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0650%23 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.1040%23 Oct →
ancient13–40.0135%23 Oct →
ancient17–19-0.0238%21 Oct →
inferno13–60.0431%21 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0638%21 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0341%21 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0136%21 Oct →
cache13–1-0.0421%21 Oct →
cache13–20.0832%21 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0714%16 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0420%16 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0130%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0229%16 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0838%15 Oct →
inferno15–150.0423%15 Oct →
anubis13–60.0424%14 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0633%11 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0522%9 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0021%8 Oct →
train13–4-0.0229%8 Oct →
mirage13–30.0525%8 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0532%7 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0412%5 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0137%2 Oct →
mirage3–130.0233%2 Oct →
ancient13–110.0019%2 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0844%2 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0227%2 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0830%2 Oct →
ancient13–110.0224%2 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0819%2 Oct →
mirage1–8-0.0730%2 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0028%29 Sept →
mirage13–30.0722%26 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0121%26 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0556%25 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0734%24 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0130%24 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0629%23 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0323%23 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0621%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0832%22 Sept →
overpass12–120.0329%22 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0434%22 Sept →
dust28–13-0.078%22 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0433%19 Sept →
dust213–40.0164%19 Sept →
overpass13–60.0439%19 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0538%19 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0623%18 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.07100%18 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.1019%16 Sept →
mirage13–30.0030%14 Sept →
ancient13–80.0228%14 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0140%14 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0710%14 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0136%14 Sept →
ancient13–40.0528%12 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0518%12 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0035%11 Sept →
mirage16–130.0336%10 Sept →
cache13–30.0634%9 Sept →
mirage12–120.1248%9 Sept →
anubis13–100.0227%9 Sept →
anubis11–130.0032%7 Sept →
ancient5–130.0524%6 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0032%4 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0330%4 Sept →
anubis13–90.0217%3 Sept →
mirage13–160.0237%3 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0331%3 Sept →
mirage13–30.0739%3 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0423%2 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0730%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.