Styroxi

Styroxi — CS2 Stats

FI76561198968422083[U:1:1008156355]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,982Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating8.0 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,123 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,123 → 3,123
+46Tracked matches · now 4,982
+10.3ppWin rate · 48.3% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 71 days played since 7 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,919 -719 7 Nov30 May · 7 days played
26,51428,649peak 28,6497 Nov30 May
28,649Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,123Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
71Days played since 2025-11-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,123
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 377 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-09-07
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStyroxiFACEITLevel 10 · 3,123 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,123csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning68
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.5pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility6.5
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning6.8
Utility6.5
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 8.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time561ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy30.0%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 29.2% → last ⅓ avg 30.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 10–13 · dust2, 6 Jun
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 8 May
375msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · ancient, 7 Nov
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 10 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2315865%0.03
ancientB1991047%0.01
dust2C135838%0.03
anubisC104640%0.02
cacheS97278%0.03
mirageC83538%0.02
infernoD62433%0.03
trainS54180%0.03
overpass43175%0.02
office220100%0.07
alpine1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,288Matches
52%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
83.2ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient60158%1.2018.2
Nuke34759%1.2218.5
Mirage31741%1.0816.5
Anubis25749%1.0515.8
Dust215646%1.0616.0
Vertigo15651%1.1517.1
Inferno12746%1.0415.3
Train7755%1.1217.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.2%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
571msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
61.6%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
5.36HE damage / grenade
13.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7638% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis1–13-0.0329%17 Sept
cache13–70.1027%15 Sept
cache13–80.0226%12 Sept
cache13–10-0.0121%11 Sept
cache13–30.0533%11 Sept
dust27–13-0.0423%11 Sept
mirage13–70.0120%8 Sept
inferno10–130.0723%7 Sept
ancient13–20.1337%7 Sept
cache3–13-0.0327%6 Sept
dust216–13-0.0224%5 Sept
ancient13–70.0220%5 Sept
anubis16–130.0239%5 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0723%5 Sept
dust211–130.0129%4 Sept
nuke15–150.0233%4 Sept
cache13–60.0350%4 Sept
nuke13–60.0734%4 Sept
ancient13–100.0428%4 Sept
nuke13–90.1231%30 Aug
nuke13–90.0226%29 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0445%21 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0121%11 Aug
nuke13–100.0546%8 Aug
mirage6–130.0138%7 Aug
ancient13–90.0129%4 Aug
nuke16–130.0332%19 Jul
inferno10–130.0739%19 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0326%3 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0427%1 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0031%22 Jun
nuke10–130.0430%22 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0523%18 Jun
dust210–13-0.0526%15 Jun
nuke5–130.1132%10 Jun
dust213–20.0639%10 Jun
dust210–130.1839%6 Jun
dust24–130.0628%3 Jun
nuke13–60.0033%1 Jun
cache13–40.0328%1 Jun
office13–30.0936%1 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0232%30 May
dust210–130.0430%30 May
anubis11–130.0140%29 May
nuke13–80.0426%26 May
ancient6–130.0036%26 May
anubis8–130.0823%26 May
overpass15–190.0421%25 May
dust24–13-0.0623%23 May
ancient13–80.0041%19 May
inferno13–5-0.0117%18 May
cache13–70.0458%8 May
cache17–190.0229%1 May
ancient5–130.0031%1 May
overpass13–110.0434%14 Apr
nuke13–90.0322%10 Apr
anubis13–10.1432%10 Apr
nuke13–110.0324%4 Apr
dust22–13-0.0533%3 Apr
ancient13–110.0231%3 Apr
mirage8–130.0735%2 Apr
alpine12–12-0.0029%31 Mar
anubis13–80.0644%31 Mar
ancient4–130.0034%30 Mar
dust213–40.0750%30 Mar
nuke13–80.0545%27 Mar
ancient13–110.0232%27 Mar
nuke10–130.0550%13 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0229%7 Mar
dust213–80.0518%7 Mar
office13–80.0630%21 Jan
overpass13–1-0.0233%20 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0436%19 Jan
overpass13–70.0226%16 Jan
inferno13–40.1227%14 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0216%11 Jan
train16–140.0032%6 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0143%5 Jan
nuke3–13-0.0439%2 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0223%31 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0424%29 Dec
nuke2–13-0.0747%19 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0439%14 Dec
nuke13–110.0720%13 Dec
mirage13–90.0530%13 Dec
nuke13–80.0217%12 Dec
train9–130.0321%10 Dec
nuke13–11-0.0227%9 Dec
dust213–70.1429%8 Dec
mirage9–130.0826%6 Dec
train13–100.0121%6 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0131%5 Dec
train13–70.0333%28 Nov
mirage6–13-0.0426%23 Nov
mirage13–90.0630%22 Nov
ancient13–10-0.0419%22 Nov
nuke13–80.1018%21 Nov
ancient22–200.0420%10 Nov
ancient0–13-0.0355%7 Nov
train13–90.0831%7 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →