Techno4K

Techno4K — CS2 Stats

PRO“PRIME CINEPLEX”The MongolzMongoliaRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198966340160[U:1:1006074432]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,416Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
31,708Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,656 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,656 → 3,656
+22Tracked matches · now 2,416
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,656 +0 27 Aug – 23 Sept · 11 observations
3,6563,656peak 3,65627 Aug23 Sept
3,656Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-03-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,656
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 344 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches125——
Win rate52%——
K/D0.94——
Headshot %68%——

Measured 9 Sep 2026 → 9 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,304), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate72.6%50.9%
Shot accuracy15.2%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.001.09
Match win rate52.0%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTechno4KFACEITLevel 10 · 3,656 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,656csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning39
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56–44Last 10056%Win rateLWLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 448ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 462ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.7
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 50 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning3.9
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time480ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 480ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 28 Mar →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 12 Sept →
297msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · nuke, 14 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 4 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

15Longest win streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 19ancientWeakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3116–1552%-0.01
infernoS1913–668%-0.00
dust2A169–756%-0.01
ancientB136–746%-0.01
nukeB105–550%-0.02
overpassA74–357%-0.01
cache—32–167%0.00
anubis—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

474,911Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
8,023Matches
52.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players
72.6%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 10 players
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
38,580MVPs
31,708Hours (in match)
9,332Bombs planted
3,814Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47200,673
AWP31,876
Glock-1814,223
Knife5,427
MP95,327
MAC-104,717

Lifetime map wins

26,684inferno
20,164dust2
13,845nuke
7,487train
3,866vertigo
208cbble
24lake
13assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,903Matches
61%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
89.8ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage42165%1.2518.3
Ancient26862%1.2218.0
Dust218866%1.1917.8
Nuke15463%1.3018.6
Inferno13476%1.2818.6
Anubis12158%1.1218.1
Overpass2669%1.1217.1
Train2665%1.1619.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$8,454Inventory value28ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Butterfly Knife | Fade (Factory New)$1,805★ Sport Gloves | Hedge Maze (Field-Tested)$1,731★ StatTrak™ Karambit | Doppler (Minimal Wear)$1,433StatTrak™ AK-47 | Redline (Minimal Wear)$484M4A1-S | Golden Coil (Factory New)$424M4A4 | Eye of Horus (Field-Tested)$400

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
479msReaction time
20.0%T opening success
37.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
7.57HE damage / grenade
13.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.0338% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0234%3 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0120%24 Sept →
ancient4–130.0030%14 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0218%14 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0830%13 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0250%12 Sept →
mirage11–130.0121%12 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0125%3 Sept →
dust29–130.0231%20 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0519%20 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0120%19 Aug →
inferno13–40.0128%16 Aug →
nuke13–100.0433%16 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0117%15 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0644%15 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0138%15 Aug →
mirage13–70.0015%12 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0122%1 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0629%31 Jul →
mirage13–70.0023%31 Jul →
nuke12–16-0.0315%31 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0128%26 Jul →
inferno13–90.0332%26 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0429%24 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0311%24 Jul →
dust219–16-0.0223%24 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0636%24 Jul →
mirage13–50.0430%23 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0513%12 Jul →
dust21–130.0325%6 Jul →
inferno16–120.0126%6 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0128%5 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0220%17 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.0120%15 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0625%15 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0417%14 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.058%14 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0522%14 Jun →
ancient13–16-0.0124%13 Jun →
nuke13–80.0020%13 Jun →
mirage6–130.0130%13 Jun →
mirage16–14-0.0135%12 Jun →
overpass13–3-0.0224%12 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0236%11 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0214%11 Jun →
mirage6–130.0134%11 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0118%7 Jun →
cache13–70.0532%30 May →
overpass10–13-0.0026%28 May →
mirage13–100.0126%22 May →
nuke10–13-0.0438%22 May →
inferno11–13-0.0228%22 May →
mirage13–11-0.0017%22 May →
dust213–40.0518%22 May →
mirage11–13-0.0221%21 May →
ancient11–13-0.0329%20 May →
mirage9–13-0.0318%20 May →
ancient13–30.0522%20 May →
overpass11–13-0.0437%13 May →
mirage10–130.0623%13 May →
mirage12–16-0.0429%12 May →
dust28–130.0130%12 May →
inferno13–11-0.0513%12 May →
inferno19–150.0123%11 May →
dust213–20.0124%11 May →
ancient16–19-0.0418%10 May →
dust211–13-0.0623%10 May →
inferno13–40.0131%9 May →
mirage25–230.0221%9 May →
ancient13–20.0232%11 Apr →
inferno13–50.0936%11 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0723%10 Apr →
mirage14–160.0233%10 Apr →
mirage13–80.0730%9 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0230%9 Apr →
ancient13–90.0440%9 Apr →
inferno13–90.0136%8 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0218%7 Apr →
dust213–110.0226%7 Apr →
ancient13–70.0134%6 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0131%6 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0220%6 Apr →
overpass13–70.0411%5 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0524%5 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0020%4 Apr →
mirage16–12-0.0314%4 Apr →
overpass13–1-0.017%4 Apr →
dust213–3-0.0122%4 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0121%4 Apr →
inferno13–90.0233%3 Apr →
nuke13–80.0632%3 Apr →
inferno13–40.0124%3 Apr →
overpass13–10-0.0335%2 Apr →
nuke13–30.0040%2 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.0115%1 Apr →
mirage13–80.0024%31 Mar →
inferno13–50.0939%28 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0527%27 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0129%27 Mar →
mirage13–80.0336%26 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches15-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.