⛟

— CS2 Stats

FI76561198965526967[U:1:1005261239]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,266Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,459Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,578 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 9 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,865 +1,729 24 Mar26 Jun · 14 days played
14,13617,567peak 17,56724 Mar26 Jun
17,567Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,578Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-03-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,578
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 173 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,334), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.5%46.8%48.3%2.8% short
Shot accuracy8.9%13.0%13.2%4.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.061.070.07 short
Match win rate45.3%46.3%46.9%1.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFACEITLevel 8 · 1,578 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,578csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning51
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55414Last 10055%Win rateLLWWTLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.7
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch5.8

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time536ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 6 Apr
57%Best headshot accuracy · 0–9 · inferno, 24 Mar
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · office, 3 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 26 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 22anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC29121741%0.01
infernoS2218482%0.01
ancientS139469%0.01
nukeA117464%0.02
dust2B84450%0.01
anubisC52340%0.02
vertigo41325%0.01
cache21150%0.01
office2020%-0.02
overpass21150%0.00
debris1010%0.02
poseidon1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,989Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
2,311Matches
45.3%Match win rate
45.5%Headshot %
8.9%Shot accuracy
5,625MVPs
874Hours (in match)
2,182Bombs planted
549Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,970
MP92,088
AWP1,138
AUG1,020

Lifetime map wins

2,566nuke
2,126inferno
1,977train
934dust2
797vertigo
246office
92cbble
89lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

720Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
79.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15651%1.1416.4
Ancient8658%1.1616.4
Nuke6258%1.1216.9
Anubis4745%1.1516.0
Inferno4260%1.0114.6
Vertigo2339%1.0215.1
Overpass1844%1.0915.2
Dust21338%0.8713.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
525msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.09HE damage / grenade
6.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6223% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0216%17 Sept
cache10–130.0218%17 Sept
ancient13–100.0413%17 Sept
ancient19–17-0.018%16 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0425%12 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0416%12 Sept
mirage12–160.0516%12 Sept
mirage10–130.0218%12 Sept
inferno13–20.1216%11 Sept
ancient6–130.0210%11 Sept
debris8–80.0214%3 Sept
office6–13-0.0313%3 Sept
office6–13-0.0119%3 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0314%3 Sept
nuke7–1-0.068%3 Sept
dust213–80.0523%3 Sept
inferno9–6-0.0110%3 Sept
nuke13–90.0111%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0012%28 Aug
inferno13–40.0323%22 Aug
anubis8–130.0513%22 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0414%21 Aug
dust213–100.0119%26 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0015%26 Jun
ancient13–11-0.029%10 Jun
dust22–12-0.1017%7 Jun
dust26–130.038%7 Jun
dust210–130.0215%7 Jun
mirage13–10.0722%7 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0614%5 Jun
inferno5–8-0.0928%5 Jun
mirage13–30.0829%1 Jun
mirage13–80.0722%31 May
nuke10–130.1617%31 May
anubis9–13-0.0213%31 May
dust29–13-0.0216%30 May
inferno13–110.0312%30 May
mirage9–130.0313%24 May
nuke13–3-0.0612%24 May
mirage13–3-0.039%24 May
ancient7–13-0.0912%20 May
inferno13–40.0419%20 May
inferno9–40.0016%12 May
poseidon5–9-0.0714%12 May
cache13–110.0116%29 Apr
inferno9–60.1417%26 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0219%26 Apr
mirage13–00.0526%26 Apr
inferno13–30.0321%26 Apr
overpass14–160.0113%25 Apr
inferno13–40.013%25 Apr
mirage16–120.0520%25 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0027%22 Apr
ancient13–90.0116%22 Apr
anubis13–70.0410%21 Apr
nuke13–60.1024%18 Apr
inferno13–70.1417%18 Apr
mirage3–130.0232%16 Apr
ancient10–130.0710%12 Apr
mirage13–50.027%10 Apr
dust213–7-0.029%9 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0716%8 Apr
mirage11–130.0314%7 Apr
inferno8–130.0313%7 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0118%7 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0222%6 Apr
mirage13–30.0013%6 Apr
dust213–70.0921%6 Apr
inferno6–9-0.0611%6 Apr
vertigo9–10.2719%6 Apr
ancient13–40.1113%30 Mar
mirage11–13-0.037%30 Mar
mirage13–50.0719%29 Mar
mirage13–20.0223%29 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0510%29 Mar
inferno9–70.0025%29 Mar
vertigo7–9-0.1319%29 Mar
nuke13–30.1018%24 Mar
ancient13–50.0813%24 Mar
mirage13–160.0221%24 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0117%24 Mar
inferno9–2-0.0411%24 Mar
inferno0–9-0.2757%24 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0210%23 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0315%23 Mar
nuke13–70.0414%23 Mar
vertigo6–9-0.0640%23 Mar
inferno9–10.1924%23 Mar
mirage9–130.017%23 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0214%19 Mar
nuke13–50.0220%12 Mar
nuke7–130.0322%12 Mar
inferno13–60.0011%12 Mar
mirage11–130.0116%12 Mar
inferno9–70.0011%12 Mar
nuke3–9-0.0710%12 Mar
ancient13–40.0411%10 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0616%10 Mar
inferno9–70.012%9 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0127%9 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →