lolxd | sxgcz

lolxd | sxgcz — CS2 Stats

SE76561198963286591[U:1:1003020863]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,535Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,210Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.1 LearningAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 3 · 958 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 17 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,527 -4,485 17 Aug20 Feb · 27 days played
9,52714,013peak 14,01317 Aug20 Feb
14,525Peak Premier in tracked matches
958Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2025-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 958
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 93 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,548), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate51.3%41.9%42.7%above
Shot accuracy14.8%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.910.980.990.08 short
Match win rate37.1%43.3%43.9%6.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlolxd | sxgczFACEITLevel 3 · 958 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO958csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim27
Positioning44
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46513Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 728ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 738ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim2.7
Utility4.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 65% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 759ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.7
Positioning4.4
Utility4.3
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time746ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 751ms → last ⅓ avg 746ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–3 · overpass, 12 Oct
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · overpass, 7 Feb
484msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 11 Sept
13–1Biggest win · train, 3 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L8Current streak
311In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2391439%-0.01
overpassB21101148%-0.01
ancientA159660%-0.01
mirageC114736%-0.04
trainS107370%-0.03
infernoC83538%-0.01
anubisD62433%0.01
dust231233%-0.00
vertigo21150%-0.03
rooftop1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,239Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
4,228Matches
37.1%Match win rate
51.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
10,351MVPs
1,294Hours (in match)
3,153Bombs planted
723Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,869
AWP4,870
P2502,036
FAMAS1,988
Knife1,800

Lifetime map wins

4,806vertigo
2,877inferno
2,278nuke
2,242dust2
1,454cbble
527train
75lake
47bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

295Matches
49%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
73.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6250%0.9214.9
Anubis4062%0.9214.7
Ancient3256%0.7713.5
Dust23241%0.8414.0
Nuke2756%0.8913.2
Inferno1856%0.8813.7
Overpass862%1.0414.6
Vertigo743%1.1618.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.9%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
13.7°Preaim
759msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
33.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.37HE damage / grenade
4.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.691° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 759.3715ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–13-0.0914%11 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0712%5 Sept
dust29–13-0.0022%6 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.1217%1 May
anubis9–13-0.0215%15 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0411%21 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0621%15 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0216%21 Feb
nuke13–20.0141%20 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0013%19 Feb
ancient13–40.0123%15 Feb
anubis8–13-0.049%15 Feb
ancient13–30.0618%13 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0210%13 Feb
overpass13–30.0716%13 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0431%13 Feb
anubis13–100.0321%13 Feb
anubis13–70.0831%9 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0416%8 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0121%7 Feb
inferno12–16-0.0218%7 Feb
overpass13–30.0348%7 Feb
overpass6–130.0111%7 Feb
ancient14–16-0.0329%7 Feb
nuke13–8-0.039%7 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0113%31 Jan
anubis10–13-0.0417%31 Jan
anubis10–130.0315%31 Jan
nuke13–80.0520%10 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0316%10 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0220%9 Jan
ancient13–50.0319%9 Jan
train13–9-0.0210%9 Jan
overpass13–8-0.0319%9 Jan
inferno13–80.0213%4 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0327%4 Jan
nuke13–100.0117%4 Jan
train13–10.0115%3 Jan
nuke10–130.028%2 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0214%2 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0316%2 Jan
ancient13–5-0.0114%28 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0615%28 Dec
ancient16–14-0.0317%28 Dec
ancient13–10-0.0423%28 Dec
overpass16–13-0.0325%27 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0414%23 Dec
train3–13-0.049%21 Dec
overpass10–13-0.0314%21 Dec
overpass5–13-0.069%20 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0210%20 Dec
ancient8–3-0.030%20 Dec
inferno13–8-0.0120%30 Nov
overpass13–9-0.0016%30 Nov
train13–8-0.0422%23 Nov
nuke13–30.0120%23 Nov
train13–90.0229%23 Nov
train16–13-0.0411%23 Nov
mirage14–16-0.0318%15 Nov
train7–13-0.0816%15 Nov
nuke11–130.0525%15 Nov
nuke11–130.0214%15 Nov
overpass13–50.0018%8 Nov
nuke16–130.0226%7 Nov
nuke13–90.0324%7 Nov
ancient13–80.0023%18 Oct
mirage16–13-0.0420%18 Oct
overpass13–10-0.0320%18 Oct
inferno8–130.0024%12 Oct
nuke6–9-0.0814%12 Oct
rooftop3–9-0.126%12 Oct
vertigo9–60.0629%12 Oct
inferno9–40.0834%12 Oct
nuke7–9-0.0623%12 Oct
overpass9–30.137%12 Oct
inferno9–13-0.0322%29 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0615%29 Sept
overpass15–15-0.0425%27 Sept
overpass13–80.0520%27 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0517%20 Sept
overpass12–16-0.0620%20 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0315%20 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0611%20 Sept
train6–13-0.0528%12 Sept
overpass10–13-0.058%12 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0510%12 Sept
dust210–13-0.0513%6 Sept
overpass8–13-0.0122%6 Sept
nuke11–130.0427%6 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0513%31 Aug
overpass6–13-0.0634%31 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0423%31 Aug
overpass6–13-0.0614%22 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0623%22 Aug
dust213–100.0437%22 Aug
train13–9-0.0024%22 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0415%19 Aug
nuke11–130.0216%19 Aug
train13–8-0.0315%17 Aug
ancient16–130.0116%17 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →