Arcane — CS2 Stats

76561198960654033[U:1:1000388305]✓ No bans

2,356Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,681Hours in CS50Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+23Tracked matches · now 2,356
+15.0ppWin rate · 48.3% → 63.3%

Rating over time

29Days played since 2026-09-05

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches33——
Win rate58%——
K/D1.40——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 4 Oct 2026 → 10 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches161——
Win rate53%——
K/D1.32——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 8 Sep 2026 → 10 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate49.3%48.2%50.9%1.6% short
Shot accuracy11.8%13.3%13.7%1.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.071.09meets
Match win rate44.4%46.9%48.4%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGArcaneFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning76
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateLWWWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.8
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 47% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning7.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time536ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy31.7%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 29.5% → last ⅓ avg 31.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 7 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 30 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 6 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 24mirageWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2414–1058%0.04
infernoB2211–1150%0.03
cacheC125–742%0.02
ancientA116–555%0.02
mirageC114–736%0.01
nukeB105–550%0.04
vertigo—43–175%0.06
office—32–167%0.02
train—10–10%0.00
dust2—11–0100%0.00
boulder—10–10%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,461Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
7,273Matches
44.4%Match win rate
49.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
11.8%Shot accuracy
20,978MVPs
1,972Hours (in match)
7,458Bombs planted
1,226Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,288
AWP20,928
Negev6,057
MAC-104,207
FAMAS2,893

Lifetime map wins

27,134inferno
2,934dust2
2,432nuke
1,950office
1,442vertigo
829cbble
486train
288lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

331Matches
52%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
79.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6458%1.4117.4
Ancient6343%1.3017.1
Anubis5661%1.5518.9
Mirage5149%1.1316.9
Nuke4755%1.2318.2
Cache2339%1.1816.2
Dust21953%0.9816.1
Overpass520%1.2819.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.6%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
527msReaction time
47.0%T opening success
62.9%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
6.38HE damage / grenade
9.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train7–130.0029%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0034%10 Oct →
anubis13–60.0326%9 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.0122%9 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0229%9 Oct →
nuke13–110.0135%9 Oct →
anubis13–40.0127%9 Oct →
cache11–130.0231%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0324%8 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0116%7 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0120%7 Oct →
ancient13–90.0233%7 Oct →
inferno13–70.0529%7 Oct →
vertigo13–30.0530%7 Oct →
mirage7–130.0128%6 Oct →
inferno13–30.039%6 Oct →
ancient10–130.0031%6 Oct →
nuke13–60.0538%5 Oct →
anubis13–80.1642%5 Oct →
inferno8–130.0433%5 Oct →
boulder1–6-0.1140%5 Oct →
mirage22–200.0424%4 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0520%4 Oct →
cache13–50.0729%4 Oct →
cache13–60.0233%3 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0042%30 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0253%30 Sept →
vertigo13–40.1245%30 Sept →
office13–90.0729%30 Sept →
cache2–13-0.04100%30 Sept →
mirage10–130.0229%26 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0417%26 Sept →
office13–90.0223%26 Sept →
inferno9–20.2025%25 Sept →
mirage1–11-0.0014%25 Sept →
anubis13–20.1330%25 Sept →
inferno9–130.0431%25 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0526%25 Sept →
inferno10–130.0221%24 Sept →
ancient13–70.0339%24 Sept →
cache13–40.1131%24 Sept →
anubis10–130.0538%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0218%23 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0320%23 Sept →
vertigo10–00.1050%23 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0840%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0635%22 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0031%22 Sept →
cache17–190.0128%22 Sept →
anubis10–130.0329%22 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0817%21 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0141%21 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0321%21 Sept →
nuke16–19-0.0022%21 Sept →
inferno13–80.0539%21 Sept →
inferno11–130.0227%20 Sept →
inferno13–30.0539%20 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0133%20 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0416%19 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0317%19 Sept →
cache11–130.0430%18 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0230%18 Sept →
anubis16–140.0243%18 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0327%18 Sept →
ancient20–220.0331%16 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0126%16 Sept →
anubis13–60.0515%15 Sept →
anubis13–70.0926%15 Sept →
nuke13–100.0831%15 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0219%14 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0831%14 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0640%13 Sept →
cache13–60.0734%13 Sept →
ancient13–60.0116%13 Sept →
ancient13–90.1235%13 Sept →
nuke11–130.0130%13 Sept →
ancient14–160.0744%12 Sept →
nuke13–40.2639%12 Sept →
anubis13–110.1023%12 Sept →
anubis25–220.0631%12 Sept →
anubis12–160.1024%10 Sept →
nuke13–100.0332%10 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0025%9 Sept →
anubis13–80.0827%9 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0128%9 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0518%9 Sept →
inferno13–80.0619%9 Sept →
anubis10–130.0429%9 Sept →
anubis13–40.0420%8 Sept →
anubis11–130.0233%8 Sept →
cache13–110.0123%8 Sept →
inferno13–100.1340%7 Sept →
office12–12-0.0233%7 Sept →
inferno9–10.2647%7 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0031%6 Sept →
mirage10–130.0221%6 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0138%6 Sept →
anubis13–70.1130%6 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0427%5 Sept →
inferno13–40.0332%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.