✯MadCap✯

✯MadCap✯ — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198951907916[U:1:991642188]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,775Tracked matches58%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,678Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating17,973Purple band · top ~16.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98300 of 223581 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 19 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,973 +207 19 Aug17 Sept · 24 days played
16,81318,472peak 18,47219 Aug17 Sept
18,514Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-08-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 499 below peak (18,472)
  • +207 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,027 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2015+5
Win rate45%73%−28pp
K/D1.081.19−0.11
Headshot %45%48%−3pp

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate45.6%43.8%44.9%meets
Shot accuracy17.4%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.131.021.04above
Match win rate51.3%44.7%45.3%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✯MadCap✯FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,973 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning72
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY464410Last 10046%Win rateWTWTLTWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 212 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 433 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 974 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.3
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch10.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 77% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 77% on T to 51% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning7.2
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels7.6
Win Impact7.6

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time565ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 9 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–3 · inferno, 25 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 21 Aug
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 10 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 52% over 21ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B32161650%0.01
mirageB21111052%0.01
infernoC156940%0.00
cacheC104640%-0.01
nukeB84450%0.00
anubisC73443%0.00
ancientD72529%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

215,450Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
10,140Matches
51.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 5 players
45.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
17.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
23,765MVPs
4,678Hours (in match)
4,079Bombs planted
1,661Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4744,391
AWP23,077
Galil AR15,042
AUG11,096
SG 5538,733
FAMAS5,438

Lifetime map wins

19,407dust2
14,267inferno
7,501nuke
6,530vertigo
2,766train
675lake
266safehouse
234ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

213Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
64.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage540%0.599.4
Train250%0.7812.5
Dust2250%0.6612.0
Vertigo1100%0.7112.0
Anubis1100%0.7724.0
Ancient10%0.255.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
559msReaction time
77.0%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
15.5%Flash assists
8.36HE damage / grenade
3.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.8624 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–140.0318%17 Sept
ancient15–150.0235%17 Sept
dust213–100.1110%17 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0213%15 Sept
dust29–13-0.0214%15 Sept
mirage15–150.0923%15 Sept
nuke13–60.0517%15 Sept
anubis9–130.0315%14 Sept
dust210–13-0.0424%14 Sept
dust213–5-0.024%14 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0314%14 Sept
mirage13–50.1318%14 Sept
dust28–13-0.0425%14 Sept
inferno13–100.0515%13 Sept
nuke16–130.0316%13 Sept
dust27–13-0.0131%13 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0125%13 Sept
dust215–15-0.0113%12 Sept
dust27–13-0.0335%11 Sept
dust213–60.0219%11 Sept
mirage10–130.0623%11 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0410%10 Sept
dust213–9-0.0415%10 Sept
nuke13–20.0727%10 Sept
dust28–130.0537%10 Sept
nuke11–130.0520%10 Sept
dust213–90.0724%10 Sept
mirage13–100.0127%9 Sept
dust213–30.1320%9 Sept
cache16–120.0219%9 Sept
ancient8–130.0121%9 Sept
anubis13–3-0.0223%8 Sept
mirage13–40.0211%8 Sept
cache6–13-0.0418%8 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0621%8 Sept
ancient13–60.0635%8 Sept
cache10–13-0.0514%7 Sept
dust213–70.0725%7 Sept
dust26–13-0.069%6 Sept
anubis13–100.0616%6 Sept
dust25–130.0516%1 Sept
mirage13–10-0.049%1 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0215%1 Sept
dust213–90.0910%31 Aug
anubis7–130.0322%31 Aug
inferno15–150.0414%31 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0217%31 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0813%31 Aug
dust211–13-0.0921%29 Aug
dust213–110.0518%29 Aug
nuke2–13-0.1217%28 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0511%28 Aug
dust213–3-0.003%28 Aug
mirage15–150.0218%28 Aug
cache13–5-0.0020%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0613%28 Aug
dust213–6-0.0619%28 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0215%27 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0129%27 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0511%27 Aug
dust23–13-0.0611%27 Aug
inferno4–00.050%27 Aug
ancient3–13-0.103%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.0018%27 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0315%26 Aug
dust213–11-0.0228%26 Aug
inferno13–30.028%26 Aug
mirage6–13-0.038%26 Aug
dust213–70.0522%26 Aug
cache10–13-0.0124%26 Aug
inferno1–30.0350%25 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0610%25 Aug
cache13–40.0920%25 Aug
inferno13–80.0514%25 Aug
mirage13–30.0524%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.0522%24 Aug
mirage13–40.1223%24 Aug
cache13–20.0732%24 Aug
dust213–30.0831%24 Aug
dust23–13-0.0116%23 Aug
nuke13–50.0026%23 Aug
dust213–100.0117%23 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0716%23 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0114%23 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0220%23 Aug
inferno13–30.0128%23 Aug
inferno7–130.0814%23 Aug
dust22–130.0030%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0811%22 Aug
dust215–15-0.0219%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.018%21 Aug
cache6–13-0.0217%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0815%21 Aug
anubis12–16-0.098%21 Aug
mirage13–70.0817%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0318%21 Aug
dust213–90.016%20 Aug
cache11–13-0.0720%20 Aug
cache15–15-0.0515%19 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0422%19 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →