Hozzek

Hozzek — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198933220995[U:1:972955267]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

896Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,860Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,268Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69527 of 222431 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−318Premier CS Rating · 20,586 → 20,268
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 10 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,268 +269 10 Aug17 Sept · 23 days played
17,62321,136peak 21,13610 Aug17 Sept
21,136Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-08-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 868 below peak (21,136)
  • +807 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,732 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches4152−11
Win rate51%38%+13pp
K/D0.920.94−0.03
Headshot %58%49%+9pp

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate51.5%44.9%45.8%above
Shot accuracy17.1%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.741.041.050.31 short
Match win rate44.5%45.3%45.7%1.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHozzekFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,268 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning54
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWLLWLLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.4
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time543ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 20 Aug
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · dust2, 30 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 15 Sept
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28161257%0.01
cacheB179853%0.01
dust2A169756%0.01
infernoD1551033%-0.00
ancientC94544%0.03
nukeC73443%-0.00
anubisS64267%0.03
office1010%-0.07
train1010%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

188,530Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
6,836Matches
44.5%Match win rate
51.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
15,665MVPs
6,860Hours (in match)
7,309Bombs planted
2,612Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4790,281
AWP15,233
FAMAS2,282
SG 5531,853
SSG 081,565

Lifetime map wins

17,222inferno
7,103dust2
5,520train
4,503vertigo
2,816nuke
141office
128cbble
28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,133Matches
51%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.2ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22955%1.2017.3
Mirage2843%1.2016.8
Inferno1747%0.9814.3
Anubis1759%1.1216.6
Ancient1547%0.9513.2
Cache1258%1.1114.1
Nuke333%1.1715.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
531msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
9.91HE damage / grenade
9.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5762% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.0617%17 Sept
cache3–13-0.1031%17 Sept
dust26–13-0.0124%17 Sept
mirage13–60.0412%16 Sept
dust26–13-0.0826%16 Sept
mirage7–130.0219%16 Sept
anubis12–120.0515%16 Sept
cache13–9-0.0318%15 Sept
inferno14–160.0111%15 Sept
ancient13–20.089%15 Sept
dust213–9-0.0010%15 Sept
ancient4–13-0.039%15 Sept
mirage13–70.1034%14 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0224%14 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0115%14 Sept
cache8–130.0424%13 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0416%13 Sept
mirage13–100.0221%13 Sept
ancient7–130.0515%9 Sept
inferno5–9-0.1110%9 Sept
dust213–70.0620%9 Sept
mirage4–130.0013%9 Sept
dust213–10-0.0113%8 Sept
inferno1–9-0.0620%8 Sept
inferno12–120.0030%7 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0215%7 Sept
dust213–80.0724%7 Sept
mirage13–100.0320%7 Sept
anubis16–140.0314%7 Sept
dust213–10-0.079%6 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0620%6 Sept
anubis13–70.0311%6 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0120%6 Sept
mirage5–13-0.078%4 Sept
anubis4–130.0212%4 Sept
office12–12-0.0728%4 Sept
mirage13–20.1132%4 Sept
cache13–5-0.0313%4 Sept
cache6–130.0114%2 Sept
inferno13–110.0615%2 Sept
dust213–110.0425%2 Sept
nuke3–13-0.049%2 Sept
cache6–13-0.0314%2 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0419%2 Sept
cache13–50.1024%31 Aug
dust29–13-0.0218%31 Aug
mirage16–140.0121%31 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0313%31 Aug
mirage16–140.0217%31 Aug
mirage13–70.0119%31 Aug
nuke13–70.0120%30 Aug
mirage13–90.0822%30 Aug
cache13–16-0.019%30 Aug
ancient13–20.0721%30 Aug
anubis13–100.047%30 Aug
cache13–80.017%30 Aug
dust213–110.0139%30 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0218%27 Aug
cache13–10-0.0514%27 Aug
dust22–13-0.0316%20 Aug
mirage5–130.0621%20 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0211%20 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0211%20 Aug
cache13–90.0411%20 Aug
cache13–50.2220%20 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0013%20 Aug
dust213–80.0916%20 Aug
inferno4–100.0618%20 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0738%20 Aug
inferno13–70.0413%20 Aug
nuke13–80.0315%19 Aug
nuke2–130.0223%19 Aug
mirage3–130.047%19 Aug
mirage13–30.017%19 Aug
dust214–160.0723%18 Aug
mirage13–110.019%18 Aug
ancient13–40.0715%18 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0119%18 Aug
cache7–13-0.0519%17 Aug
cache13–90.038%17 Aug
inferno13–100.028%17 Aug
cache14–16-0.0411%17 Aug
mirage13–40.0721%17 Aug
inferno15–150.0514%17 Aug
dust213–2-0.018%17 Aug
ancient13–16-0.016%14 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0430%14 Aug
cache13–50.025%13 Aug
dust210–130.0129%13 Aug
ancient13–70.0516%12 Aug
mirage13–110.0011%12 Aug
mirage8–130.0111%12 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0312%12 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0411%12 Aug
train9–130.1322%12 Aug
dust26–130.0122%11 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0112%11 Aug
cache9–130.0221%11 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0219%11 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0218%10 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →