Mahuuni — CS2 Stats

FI76561198930435038[U:1:970169310]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,748Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.7 Developing

Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11693 of 18103 tracked

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning45

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateWWWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression5.3

Utility4.2

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels0.8

Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning4.5

Utility4.2

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time606ms−60ms

first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy17.9%+0.6%

first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 9–3

13–1Biggest win — anubis

4Longest win streak

W4Current streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	24	13–11	54%	-0.03
nuke	C	23	9–14	39%	-0.01
inferno	D	16	5–11	31%	0.00
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.01
cache	S	9	7–2	78%	-0.03
dust2	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.02
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.00
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,939Matches

50%Win rate

0.92Avg K/D

79.9ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	50	54%	0.99	15.0
Ancient	41	54%	1.20	16.0
Dust2	31	48%	1.08	16.2
Inferno	25	60%	1.02	15.7
Anubis	24	54%	1.05	16.8
Nuke	22	55%	0.98	15.1
Train	5	20%	0.73	13.0
Cache	3	33%	0.66	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy

30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.3%Spray accuracy

76.1%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

599msReaction time

23.5%T opening success

43.1%CT opening success

0.44Enemies flashed / flash

6.4%Flash assists

7.49HE damage / grenade

4.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4366 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.5169% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–4	-0.07	18%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	22%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	15%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.08	13%	28 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.08	5%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.10	22%	28 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.10	8%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	20%	27 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.04	26%	27 Aug →
nuke	16–12	-0.02	17%	26 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	12%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	22%	26 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	8%	26 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.02	12%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	20%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.03	29%	25 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	17%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.16	19%	25 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	23%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	14%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	13%	24 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.09	14%	24 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	16%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.00	24%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.09	11%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.07	21%	23 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	36%	23 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	28%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	10%	23 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.06	20%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.10	29%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	7%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	16%	22 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	18%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.06	23%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	27%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	24%	22 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	7%	22 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.09	23%	22 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.07	18%	22 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	16%	18 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	15%	18 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	25%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	23%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.00	24%	18 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	33%	18 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.06	23%	18 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	17%	17 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	24%	17 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	14%	17 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	10%	17 Aug →
nuke	8–8	-0.05	20%	17 Aug →
vertigo	8–8	-0.12	8%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.09	19%	17 Aug →
inferno	7–9	0.05	13%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.08	21%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	17%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	16%	17 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	20%	16 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.03	21%	16 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	24%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	8%	16 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	30%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	12%	16 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	26%	16 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.05	14%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	16%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–1	-0.03	23%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.00	16%	14 Aug →
overpass	9–6	0.03	8%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–9	-0.04	11%	14 Aug →
vertigo	9–3	0.09	13%	14 Aug →
inferno	9–3	0.18	32%	14 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	13%	14 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	23%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	18%	14 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	11%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	14%	13 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.03	10%	13 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	21%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	28%	13 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.02	21%	13 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.12	16%	12 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	18%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.00	16%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	14%	12 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.01	29%	12 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	30%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	21%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	16%	10 Aug →
mirage	1–9	-0.17	0%	10 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.05	30%	10 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.09	4%	10 Aug →
inferno	7–9	-0.07	16%	10 Aug →