Marcus Aurelius

Marcus Aurelius — CS2 Stats

76561198930227968[U:1:969962240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,146Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,695 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Aug 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,695 → 3,695
+169Tracked matches · now 5,146
−13.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 60 days played since 1 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,585 +0 6 Jul28 Aug · 2 days played
19,58519,585peak 19,5856 Jul28 Aug
Faceit ELO: 3,695 +0 28 Aug31 Aug · 3 observations
3,6953,695peak 3,69528 Aug31 Aug
19,585Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,695Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2026-02-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,695
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 305 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMarcus AureliusFACEITLevel 10 · 3,695 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,695csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning52
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5248Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility6.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning5.2
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time536ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 12 Sept
60%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 19 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 29 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 28 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
156In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 41% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28131546%-0.00
ancientA24141058%0.01
dust2C2291341%-0.00
anubisS128467%0.01
infernoA106460%0.03
nuke21150%0.03
overpass21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,649Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
80.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage169152%1.1616.4
Dust2111153%1.1816.4
Ancient98854%1.1716.2
Anubis89355%1.2317.0
Inferno46555%1.2216.6
Nuke16251%1.1316.0
Vertigo10358%1.2318.5
Overpass6354%1.2217.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.7%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
506msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
8.45HE damage / grenade
10.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.5726% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient3–13-0.0760%19 Sept
inferno9–70.1532%12 Sept
mirage8–130.0128%11 Sept
anubis10–130.0321%9 Sept
ancient3–130.0521%9 Sept
dust210–13-0.0512%5 Sept
inferno16–190.0313%5 Sept
dust28–130.0318%29 Aug
ancient13–00.1019%28 Aug
dust216–13-0.0017%25 Aug
ancient13–110.0031%22 Aug
ancient1–130.0330%21 Aug
mirage8–130.0018%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0114%19 Aug
mirage13–80.0823%19 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0114%19 Aug
anubis13–60.0218%19 Aug
dust210–13-0.0417%12 Aug
dust216–140.0721%12 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0321%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0519%19 Jul
inferno16–19-0.0524%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.0532%8 Jul
nuke13–80.0431%6 Jul
ancient13–40.0514%28 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0117%27 Jun
dust21–13-0.0035%23 Jun
mirage15–190.0222%5 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0215%5 Jun
mirage13–80.0526%5 Jun
anubis13–110.0234%1 Jun
dust24–130.0429%30 May
anubis13–7-0.0435%5 May
dust213–90.0335%2 May
anubis16–130.0624%30 Apr
mirage9–130.0024%27 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0310%24 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0114%24 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0124%18 Apr
anubis13–110.0726%15 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0523%15 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0316%11 Apr
anubis13–80.0122%7 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0323%7 Apr
ancient13–100.0011%7 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0317%7 Apr
anubis3–130.0331%7 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0322%6 Apr
ancient13–80.0522%6 Apr
anubis13–60.0126%6 Apr
mirage13–40.0520%5 Apr
nuke1–40.0130%3 Apr
ancient13–70.0930%3 Apr
ancient19–150.0021%27 Mar
mirage13–110.0116%27 Mar
dust213–40.0133%27 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0717%27 Mar
dust213–11-0.0316%26 Mar
ancient13–70.0019%24 Mar
dust23–13-0.0529%24 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0510%21 Mar
ancient15–19-0.0720%21 Mar
mirage5–130.0216%21 Mar
anubis7–130.0117%21 Mar
dust27–130.0018%21 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0419%21 Mar
mirage13–90.0227%20 Mar
mirage11–130.0314%20 Mar
dust213–5-0.0320%20 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0119%20 Mar
ancient13–70.1124%19 Mar
overpass13–90.0418%18 Mar
inferno13–70.0428%18 Mar
dust213–60.0714%13 Mar
inferno13–30.1229%12 Mar
dust27–13-0.0513%11 Mar
anubis20–22-0.0818%8 Mar
inferno10–130.0032%7 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0631%7 Mar
mirage19–16-0.0033%6 Mar
mirage13–110.0831%6 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0016%6 Mar
mirage14–160.0325%3 Mar
dust210–130.0124%3 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0317%3 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0719%28 Feb
ancient13–160.0425%26 Feb
dust213–110.0516%25 Feb
inferno16–120.0030%22 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0020%22 Feb
inferno16–140.0227%22 Feb
ancient13–70.0322%16 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0215%15 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0320%11 Feb
dust211–13-0.0224%11 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0137%5 Feb
dust219–220.0134%4 Feb
dust213–9-0.0421%4 Feb
mirage13–110.0029%3 Feb
mirage12–16-0.0446%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →