zilock

zilock — CS2 Stats

76561198918716711[U:1:958450983]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

332Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,104Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#29876 of 223839 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,319 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 4 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,872 +8,174 14 May7 Jun · 19 days played
15,69824,039peak 24,03914 May7 Jun
24,039Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,319Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-05-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,319
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate56.9%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy12.1%13.2%13.7%1.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.071.09above
Match win rate46.4%46.9%48.4%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzilockFACEITLevel 9 · 1,319 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,319csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning69
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY64315Last 10064%Win rateWWLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −115ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 1262 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.5
Utility5.5
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels6.9
Clutch5.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time638ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy29.1%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 27.8% → last ⅓ avg 29.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 3 Jun
43%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 4 May
438msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · vertigo, 7 Jun
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 23 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
W2Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 56% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2718967%0.03
dust2A27151256%0.04
nukeS1410471%0.02
cacheA138562%0.02
infernoS86275%0.07
ancientS75271%0.05
vertigo21150%0.04
anubis21150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (56% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,874Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
1,508Matches
46.4%Match win rate
56.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
12.1%Shot accuracy
6,213MVPs
1,104Hours (in match)
684Bombs planted
986Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,062dust2
1,570inferno
1,316vertigo
997nuke
501train
74cbble
70lake
29office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

169Matches
58%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
101.5ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
39%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5555%1.2921.0
Dust22767%1.4621.5
Inferno2255%1.2218.6
Ancient1346%1.1619.3
Cache1267%1.4623.4
Nuke1164%1.2020.9
Train888%1.3923.4
Anubis560%1.1121.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.2%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
636msReaction time
44.1%T opening success
61.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
5.48HE damage / grenade
16.44Flashes / match

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0236%3 Sept
cache13–5-0.0018%2 Sept
mirage12–160.0338%20 Aug
cache13–50.0140%19 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0320%28 Jun
nuke10–130.0625%19 Jun
dust23–130.0531%19 Jun
dust213–100.0227%8 Jun
vertigo13–80.0422%7 Jun
dust27–13-0.0128%7 Jun
ancient13–90.0829%6 Jun
mirage7–130.0142%6 Jun
dust213–40.0432%5 Jun
dust27–130.0237%5 Jun
cache12–120.0543%5 Jun
mirage13–60.1432%3 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0324%3 Jun
inferno9–10.2921%3 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0217%3 Jun
mirage13–60.0930%2 Jun
dust210–13-0.0134%2 Jun
dust213–70.1335%1 Jun
nuke6–130.0629%1 Jun
dust213–70.0831%1 Jun
mirage13–80.0322%31 May
nuke13–10-0.0229%31 May
mirage13–100.0521%31 May
inferno13–110.0326%30 May
cache12–12-0.0520%30 May
inferno13–80.1320%30 May
mirage13–90.0529%29 May
dust213–60.1433%29 May
dust216–130.0237%29 May
ancient13–80.0219%29 May
dust216–130.1229%28 May
mirage7–13-0.0138%28 May
mirage13–80.0122%28 May
dust25–13-0.0429%28 May
mirage13–60.0134%28 May
anubis8–13-0.0314%28 May
cache13–5-0.0329%27 May
nuke13–100.0123%27 May
mirage2–13-0.0319%27 May
mirage13–110.1027%27 May
dust213–80.0424%25 May
dust29–13-0.0319%25 May
mirage10–13-0.0430%25 May
dust213–60.0427%25 May
inferno11–13-0.0210%23 May
nuke13–70.0027%23 May
dust28–130.0234%23 May
mirage9–130.0830%23 May
mirage13–10.1132%23 May
nuke6–130.0925%22 May
ancient13–100.0919%22 May
mirage16–120.0919%21 May
nuke9–70.1520%21 May
nuke6–9-0.0328%21 May
ancient3–130.0932%21 May
mirage13–80.0832%21 May
dust213–80.0317%21 May
mirage10–130.0127%21 May
cache13–70.0117%21 May
vertigo12–120.0432%20 May
cache13–10.0732%20 May
dust28–130.0120%19 May
dust213–50.0539%18 May
dust215–15-0.0024%18 May
mirage16–140.0218%18 May
nuke13–110.0331%18 May
ancient13–40.0623%18 May
dust213–60.0422%18 May
inferno13–70.0730%17 May
dust213–8-0.0027%17 May
dust213–60.1125%17 May
anubis13–50.0436%17 May
mirage13–30.0143%15 May
mirage8–50.0018%15 May
cache13–6-0.0417%15 May
cache8–130.0030%15 May
dust214–160.0829%15 May
mirage14–160.0140%15 May
mirage13–3-0.0026%15 May
dust213–100.0328%14 May
inferno13–50.0623%14 May
nuke13–30.0325%14 May
nuke13–10-0.0127%14 May
mirage5–13-0.0220%14 May
inferno13–60.0733%13 May
mirage13–2-0.0127%13 May
cache9–13-0.0021%12 May
cache13–20.1533%9 May
cache13–50.0738%9 May
cache3–130.0333%9 May
mirage13–90.0419%8 May
ancient14–160.0426%4 May
dust29–13-0.0119%4 May
dust211–130.0443%4 May
nuke13–9-0.0039%4 May
nuke19–16-0.0521%4 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →