Gurggu

Gurggu — CS2 Stats

AX76561198889618465[U:1:929352737]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

919Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,933Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,359 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 5 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,475 +1,456 10 Mar17 May · 15 days played
12,90914,777peak 14,77710 Mar17 May
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,359Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-03-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,359
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 172 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-21
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate46.9%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy13.2%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.911.041.050.14 short
Match win rate39.9%45.2%45.7%5.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGurgguFACEITLevel 6 · 1,359 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,359csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning63
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48511Last 10048%Win rateWWWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −76ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility3.6
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 689ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning6.3
Utility3.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time702ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 702ms → last ⅓ avg 702ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 25 Mar
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · ancient, 22 Mar
516msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · nuke, 17 Sept
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 24 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 20ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28161257%0.01
nukeS2013765%0.01
dust2C146843%0.00
anubisD1441029%-0.01
ancientD82625%-0.03
infernoC73443%-0.01
overpassA53260%0.02
cache41325%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,652Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
3,876Matches
39.9%Match win rate
46.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
8,365MVPs
1,933Hours (in match)
3,245Bombs planted
665Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,535
AWP9,733
FAMAS1,559
SSG 081,482
Knife1,421
P901,338

Lifetime map wins

3,742nuke
3,078inferno
2,321dust2
1,682vertigo
1,340train
1,121lake
349office
90safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

466Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
80.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11753%0.9415.0
Nuke9962%1.1516.4
Dust27152%0.9815.6
Ancient4030%0.9014.9
Anubis3543%0.9815.8
Inferno3549%0.9515.5
Train3171%1.1115.7
Overpass1346%1.1019.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
689msReaction time
40.9%T opening success
57.3%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
6.88HE damage / grenade
4.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0511%20 Sept
nuke13–60.1040%20 Sept
mirage13–7-0.018%18 Sept
nuke11–130.0929%17 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0617%17 Sept
dust29–13-0.0717%17 Sept
anubis9–130.0717%16 Sept
inferno8–130.0429%15 Sept
anubis13–10-0.079%15 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0825%14 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0328%13 Aug
dust219–170.0517%26 Jul
dust213–160.0218%17 May
dust213–110.0518%17 May
mirage13–100.0122%17 May
mirage13–40.0115%13 May
cache5–13-0.0912%8 May
cache13–110.0318%8 May
mirage16–12-0.0422%4 May
anubis13–6-0.0120%4 May
mirage19–160.0323%4 May
mirage11–13-0.0118%3 May
nuke7–13-0.0721%3 May
nuke13–30.0130%3 May
anubis10–130.0130%2 May
nuke19–16-0.0114%29 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0128%29 Apr
mirage15–150.009%29 Apr
overpass16–14-0.0212%28 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0413%28 Apr
cache10–13-0.097%27 Apr
mirage19–17-0.0113%27 Apr
cache10–13-0.0813%26 Apr
inferno2–130.0348%26 Apr
dust213–6-0.0024%26 Apr
dust210–13-0.0221%25 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0522%6 Apr
anubis9–130.0216%6 Apr
mirage13–100.0316%6 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0211%5 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0220%5 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0913%5 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0318%5 Apr
dust213–16-0.0319%4 Apr
nuke13–90.019%4 Apr
dust213–11-0.0321%4 Apr
inferno16–14-0.0810%3 Apr
dust213–6-0.0331%3 Apr
mirage7–13-0.099%2 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0323%2 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0515%2 Apr
nuke13–90.0228%2 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0514%2 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0024%31 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0612%31 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0220%31 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0122%26 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0318%26 Mar
nuke13–110.0717%26 Mar
mirage13–110.0325%26 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0120%26 Mar
dust213–70.1614%25 Mar
mirage9–13-0.038%24 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0815%24 Mar
nuke13–1-0.0219%24 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0512%23 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0213%23 Mar
nuke13–80.0820%23 Mar
overpass8–130.0318%22 Mar
ancient13–2-0.0158%22 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0018%22 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0035%21 Mar
nuke3–130.0623%21 Mar
nuke13–40.0521%15 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0415%14 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0820%14 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0528%13 Mar
anubis12–30.0427%13 Mar
dust27–13-0.0120%13 Mar
mirage9–130.0219%11 Mar
nuke13–110.0126%10 Mar
dust211–13-0.0311%10 Mar
overpass13–40.038%10 Mar
anubis9–130.0310%10 Mar
mirage13–10.0827%10 Mar
ancient13–100.038%10 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0121%9 Mar
anubis16–140.0312%9 Mar
inferno13–100.0525%9 Mar
mirage13–40.0424%8 Mar
dust211–13-0.0033%8 Mar
mirage13–50.0816%8 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0421%6 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0120%6 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0314%6 Mar
dust29–130.0143%6 Mar
mirage13–70.1329%6 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0333%6 Mar
mirage10–130.1025%5 Mar
overpass13–60.0630%5 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →