𝔼𝕩𝕣𝕚𝕥𝕖𝕫 — CS2 Stats

SE76561198884051305[U:1:923785577]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

955Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#82465 of 252624 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,590 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,999 → 19,999

0Faceit ELO · 1,590 → 1,590

+40Tracked matches · now 955

+6.7ppWin rate · 53.3% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +1,465 2 Jun – 20 Sept · 13 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,590 +0 30 Aug – 20 Sept · 4 observations

19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,590Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

40Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,590
Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 161 to go
Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 19,999
+336 over 90 days
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning60

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateLWWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

14–6 · 70% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.8

Utility5.5

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels1.3

Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning6.0

Utility5.5

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time522ms−33ms

first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms

Headshot accuracy15.9%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 2 Oct →

32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 17 Jun →

398msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 15 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · ancient, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	30	19–11	63%	-0.00
ancient	B	24	13–11	54%	-0.02
dust2	A	14	9–5	64%	0.01
mirage	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.01
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.00
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
overpass	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

454Matches

51%Win rate

0.97Avg K/D

74.5ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	108	56%	1.00	14.3
Mirage	97	54%	0.98	14.9
Ancient	91	53%	0.95	15.2
Nuke	50	48%	1.01	15.3
Dust2	28	46%	0.96	14.5
Anubis	26	46%	0.99	16.5
Overpass	16	38%	0.82	13.7
Train	7	0%	0.85	14.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy

38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

76.3%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

519msReaction time

48.3%T opening success

41.7%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

8.9%Flash assists

7.71HE damage / grenade

7.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.492 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	6–13	0.03	21%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.03	19%	13 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.00	14%	13 Oct →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	15%	13 Oct →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	15%	7 Oct →
inferno	13–6	0.01	19%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–10	-0.06	11%	7 Oct →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	8%	5 Oct →
dust2	6–13	0.05	20%	5 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	17%	5 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.01	16%	4 Oct →
overpass	6–13	-0.01	16%	4 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	21%	4 Oct →
mirage	8–3	-0.06	9%	2 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.11	29%	2 Oct →
inferno	19–16	0.01	17%	1 Oct →
ancient	13–1	0.04	20%	1 Oct →
inferno	19–15	-0.02	19%	29 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	12%	24 Sept →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	22%	24 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	16%	23 Sept →
inferno	13–6	-0.07	18%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.09	14%	23 Sept →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	10%	23 Sept →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	6%	23 Sept →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	12%	23 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	14%	22 Sept →
anubis	6–13	0.02	13%	22 Sept →
ancient	13–3	-0.01	25%	22 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.04	19%	22 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	14%	20 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	11%	20 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	14%	15 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	19%	9 Sept →
ancient	16–13	0.01	17%	9 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.00	21%	9 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	15%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–2	0.08	21%	9 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	12%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.05	12%	31 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	9%	31 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.07	13%	31 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.02	19%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.00	20%	25 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	25%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.04	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	12%	25 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	4%	24 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.01	16%	24 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.06	15%	24 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	13%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	20%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.06	16%	24 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	9%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.01	16%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	13%	23 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.02	18%	21 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.02	14%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	16%	20 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	23%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	23%	19 Aug →
inferno	19–16	0.04	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.05	29%	17 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	23%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	13%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	16%	10 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.09	7%	10 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.26	20%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	27%	5 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	20%	23 Jun →
overpass	6–13	-0.03	20%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–8	-0.06	18%	23 Jun →
inferno	9–2	0.10	21%	23 Jun →
mirage	4–13	0.05	23%	22 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	21%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.03	18%	22 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	27%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.04	21%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	8%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.03	21%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–16	-0.04	17%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	32%	17 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	12%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.02	0%	8 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	9%	8 Jun →
inferno	16–12	0.02	21%	7 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.00	17%	4 Jun →
overpass	6–13	0.04	22%	4 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.09	24%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.04	14%	4 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	26%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.06	19%	2 Jun →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	14%	28 May →
ancient	16–12	-0.04	17%	25 May →
nuke	13–3	0.09	27%	25 May →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	24%	25 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	5%	20 May →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	24%	16 May →
ancient	13–7	0.01	14%	13 May →