mehmet bilal

mehmet bilal — CS2 Stats

AF76561198882053113[U:1:921787385]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

421Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,586Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#91854 of 260014 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,495 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,588 -2,701 18 Feb – 4 Jun · 17 days played
19,58822,289peak 22,28918 Feb4 Jun
22,837Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,495Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-02-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,495
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 36 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate50.4%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy14.6%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.151.051.06above
Match win rate47.3%45.7%46.3%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 8 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmehmet bilalFACEITLevel 7 · 1,495 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,495csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning61
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–57–3Last 10040%Win rateWLWLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch3.8

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.1
Utility5.6
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time593ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy28.2%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 14 Jul →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · warden, 25 Feb →
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 11 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 27 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
2–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 56% over 9ancientWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD217–1433%0.03
dust2B136–746%0.02
nukeD134–931%0.01
infernoA116–555%0.02
cacheA95–456%0.03
officeA95–456%0.03
ancientD71–614%0.01
vertigoC52–340%0.02
anubis—41–325%0.01
overpass—33–0100%0.07
poseidon—10–10%0.02
boulder—10–10%-0.10
fachwerk—10–10%0.03
alpine—10–10%-0.06
warden—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,727Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,368Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
50.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
8,182MVPs
899Hours (in match)
1,362Bombs planted
586Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,099
AWP7,544
SSG 082,068
Knife804
MP9672

Lifetime map wins

2,440nuke
2,057dust2
1,763inferno
1,591vertigo
1,352train
453office
387cbble
98lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

208Matches
56%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
87.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3158%1.1617.3
Dust22665%1.2617.8
Nuke1942%1.0815.5
Overpass786%1.0718.4
Ancient650%1.3019.3
Anubis540%1.0318.0
Inferno5100%1.6517.6
Vertigo1100%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.4%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
88.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
575msReaction time
44.1%T opening success
59.2%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
11.43HE damage / grenade
8.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0129%29 Sept →
inferno4–130.0226%29 Sept →
cache13–80.0344%18 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0029%18 Sept →
nuke10–130.0117%18 Sept →
mirage11–130.0327%18 Sept →
office13–100.0135%18 Sept →
nuke8–130.0213%17 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0124%17 Sept →
poseidon7–90.0217%16 Sept →
mirage13–50.0524%14 Jul →
cache13–50.2242%14 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0425%14 Jul →
anubis13–100.0227%13 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0118%13 Jul →
inferno6–3-0.036%13 Jul →
nuke13–90.0938%13 Jul →
mirage7–130.1131%13 Jul →
dust212–120.0231%13 Jul →
boulder2–13-0.1045%13 Jul →
fachwerk12–120.0324%12 Jul →
office3–13-0.0614%11 Jul →
inferno13–110.0018%11 Jul →
cache6–130.0022%11 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0835%11 Jul →
cache13–70.0339%1 Jul →
office13–20.0228%1 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0246%1 Jul →
vertigo13–70.0138%4 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0126%4 Jun →
office7–130.0318%2 Jun →
anubis8–130.0539%2 Jun →
nuke13–00.0233%27 May →
cache8–130.0828%26 May →
dust213–40.0630%26 May →
office13–70.0311%6 May →
mirage13–100.0623%6 May →
cache2–13-0.1120%4 May →
cache5–13-0.0324%30 Apr →
cache13–70.0421%30 Apr →
inferno9–10.1522%28 Apr →
office9–130.0322%8 Apr →
vertigo9–130.0714%8 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0413%7 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0327%7 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0610%1 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0118%1 Apr →
nuke5–130.0224%29 Mar →
dust213–110.0221%29 Mar →
vertigo9–40.1718%29 Mar →
overpass13–90.0522%29 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0026%27 Mar →
inferno13–00.0918%25 Mar →
alpine7–13-0.0624%25 Mar →
mirage1–13-0.0617%25 Mar →
mirage13–80.0513%24 Mar →
mirage11–130.0526%23 Mar →
dust213–60.0427%23 Mar →
nuke10–130.0613%22 Mar →
mirage14–160.0522%20 Mar →
mirage14–16-0.0518%20 Mar →
office13–70.1733%19 Mar →
mirage9–130.0320%19 Mar →
office13–90.0427%18 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0118%17 Mar →
nuke13–30.0312%17 Mar →
overpass13–50.1122%12 Mar →
dust29–130.0638%10 Mar →
mirage13–70.0133%10 Mar →
mirage13–60.0830%10 Mar →
mirage8–130.0241%28 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0427%27 Feb →
ancient4–130.0116%27 Feb →
overpass13–60.0423%26 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0322%26 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0442%26 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0017%26 Feb →
dust211–130.0025%26 Feb →
mirage5–130.0423%26 Feb →
dust213–90.0628%25 Feb →
warden11–130.0447%25 Feb →
inferno13–10.1515%25 Feb →
ancient10–130.0216%24 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0319%22 Feb →
mirage15–150.1119%22 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0319%20 Feb →
ancient8–130.0826%20 Feb →
nuke9–130.0225%19 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0229%19 Feb →
mirage13–60.0930%19 Feb →
inferno6–9-0.0915%19 Feb →
vertigo3–9-0.0620%19 Feb →
office8–13-0.0012%19 Feb →
nuke13–50.0311%19 Feb →
dust25–130.0222%19 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0718%19 Feb →
ancient11–130.0818%18 Feb →
mirage0–130.000%18 Feb →
dust27–130.0119%18 Feb →
vertigo7–13-0.0939%18 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.