🦀 — CS2 Stats

HK76561198872260579[U:1:911994851]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

978Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,308Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating21,129Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#59551 of 221117 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,843 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 25 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,129 +6,130 17 Feb – 16 Sept · 15 days played

22,858Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,843Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

43Days played since 2026-01-25

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,843
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 158 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

1,607 below peak (22,736)
-573 over 30 days · declining
+2,571 over 90 days
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,871 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	42.5%	46.8%	48.3%	5.8% short
Shot accuracy	16.0%	13.0%	13.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.04	1.06	1.07	0.03 short
Match win rate	52.6%	46.3%	46.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning72

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–42–12Last 10046%Win rateWLWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

7–12–1 · 35% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.1

Utility4.2

Positioning7.2

Opening Duels4.5

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning7.2

Utility4.2

Mechanics5.0

Opening Duels5.3

Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time500ms−56ms

first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 500ms

Headshot accuracy14.2%−3.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 12–12 · dust2, 14 Sept →

42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 19 Jul →

344msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 7 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · mirage, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 43% over 65

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	65	28–37	43%	0.00
ancient	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.01
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	0.01
mirage	S	6	4–2	67%	0.01
cache	—	2	0–2	0%	0.07
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
nuke	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 65). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

126,615Lifetime kills

1.04K/D

5,917Matches

52.6%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 8 players

42.5%Headshot %

16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players

14,932MVPs

2,655Hours (in match)

7,765Bombs planted

1,620Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,787

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,741

AWP12,278

MP99,393

SSG 088,949

P2000 / USP-S6,109

Desert Eagle5,819

Glock-185,804

SG 5533,776

MP73,380

Lifetime map wins

51,976dust2

6,195inferno

3,580vertigo

3,183nuke

579train

29office

19cbble

10ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,648Matches

53%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

79.9ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	50	60%	1.10	14.6
Ancient	18	50%	0.91	15.0
Mirage	11	18%	0.88	15.6
Inferno	11	27%	0.98	15.9
Train	5	20%	0.66	11.0
Anubis	5	40%	0.94	14.6
Nuke	3	33%	0.92	14.0
Vertigo	1	0%	1.26	24.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.9%Headshot accuracy

35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.6%Spray accuracy

72.7%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

510msReaction time

46.2%T opening success

56.3%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

4.9%Flash assists

12.89HE damage / grenade

3.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.9381% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.4421 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 65 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	16–12	0.02	9%	16 Sept →
ancient	5–13	0.04	10%	16 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.09	18%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–6	-0.07	18%	16 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	10%	16 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.05	24%	15 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.03	14%	15 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.08	19%	15 Sept →
dust2	0–13	-0.08	0%	15 Sept →
anubis	16–14	0.06	13%	15 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	13%	15 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	12%	15 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.13	23%	14 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	12%	14 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.04	13%	13 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	14%	12 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.02	11%	12 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	22%	12 Sept →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	9%	12 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	11%	12 Sept →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	8%	12 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.05	15%	9 Sept →
dust2	3–13	0.01	20%	9 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.07	7%	7 Sept →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	13%	7 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.01	6%	7 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.07	16%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–0	0.06	11%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.02	19%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.02	18%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.01	19%	3 Sept →
dust2	12–12	0.02	21%	3 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	19%	3 Sept →
ancient	12–12	0.01	15%	2 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	13%	2 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.04	14%	2 Sept →
ancient	14–16	-0.05	15%	1 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	12%	1 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.03	14%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	7%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	19%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	21%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	10%	24 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	16%	24 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.03	38%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	11%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	19%	20 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	13%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.00	25%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	13%	16 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.02	12%	15 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	19%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.09	20%	10 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.11	23%	9 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	8%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.00	22%	8 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.08	9%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	18%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.08	10%	7 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.03	28%	6 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	9%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	26%	5 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.01	18%	5 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	12%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	29%	4 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.00	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	13%	31 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.08	9%	31 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	23%	30 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.02	13%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	24%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	17%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	17%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	13%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.09	42%	19 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	23%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.00	19%	16 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.10	10%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	9%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.06	10%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	31%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.04	17%	8 May →
dust2	13–9	0.07	16%	2 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.07	14%	2 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.07	16%	19 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.03	14%	18 Mar →
dust2	13–9	0.07	22%	5 Mar →
dust2	5–13	-0.10	14%	5 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.03	19%	1 Mar →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	13%	28 Feb →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	20%	19 Feb →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	23%	19 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.04	21%	19 Feb →
inferno	13–2	-0.02	15%	17 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.01	20%	1 Feb →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	13%	26 Jan →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	16%	26 Jan →
dust2	13–1	-0.00	10%	25 Jan →
dust2	13–5	0.02	23%	25 Jan →
dust2	9–13	0.02	20%	25 Jan →