FeINT

FeINT — CS2 Stats

KZ76561198870199105[U:1:909933377]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

757Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,948Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,327Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26498 of 227175 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 10 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,327 +2,793 10 Jun17 Sept · 33 days played
21,53425,367peak 25,36710 Jun17 Sept
25,367Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-06-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,040 below peak (25,367)
  • +301 over 30 days · steady
  • +2,409 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 673 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches440
Win rate0%75%−75pp
K/D0.440.73−0.29
Headshot %48%51%−3pp

Measured 12 Sep 202619 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.1%48.3%51.0%2.9% short
Shot accuracy18.8%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.121.071.09above
Match win rate48.7%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFeINTFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,327 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning47
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58384Last 10058%Win rateLLLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility2.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.7
Utility2.3
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time561ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 10 Jul
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 20 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 17 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 22 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 50% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB23121152%0.02
dust2A2213959%-0.00
ancientB168850%0.00
anubisA149564%0.03
infernoS107370%0.02
nukeS75271%0.01
cache43175%0.01
overpass41325%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,174Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
4,393Matches
48.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
48.1%Headshot %
18.8%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 9 players
15,206MVPs
1,805Hours (in match)
2,846Bombs planted
1,091Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,622
AWP13,730
MP92,552
SSG 082,121
FAMAS2,068
MAC-102,068

Lifetime map wins

3,355dust2
3,194inferno
1,343nuke
789vertigo
770office
566train
78cbble
71italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

583Matches
54%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
82.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2650%1.2017.4
Anubis2045%1.0514.3
Ancient1164%0.9217.4
Vertigo667%1.6017.5
Inferno450%1.6921.8
Dust2475%1.2214.8
Overpass450%0.7611.5
Nuke250%0.9114.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.5%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
531msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.30Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
2.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.297 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.333% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–13-0.0918%17 Sept
ancient4–13-0.109%17 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0114%16 Sept
dust20–13-0.100%15 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0718%11 Sept
dust22–13-0.1219%11 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0213%9 Sept
anubis13–50.0215%7 Sept
ancient13–110.0316%2 Sept
inferno16–13-0.0116%27 Aug
dust213–80.088%22 Aug
dust20–13-0.0618%22 Aug
anubis5–130.0226%17 Aug
dust26–13-0.0718%16 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0111%15 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0414%15 Aug
ancient13–60.039%14 Aug
anubis13–70.0510%13 Aug
ancient9–130.0312%12 Aug
ancient13–10.059%4 Aug
anubis13–60.009%3 Aug
mirage12–120.0425%1 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0026%29 Jul
cache13–4-0.0114%29 Jul
inferno13–100.0118%29 Jul
cache9–60.0017%28 Jul
cache10–130.0426%27 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0130%23 Jul
dust23–13-0.1125%23 Jul
mirage5–0-0.0329%23 Jul
nuke13–70.0027%23 Jul
dust213–80.0417%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0713%21 Jul
inferno5–130.1017%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0116%21 Jul
dust213–50.0519%21 Jul
anubis13–10.0623%21 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0237%20 Jul
mirage15–150.0233%20 Jul
mirage13–30.0421%20 Jul
inferno11–60.0220%20 Jul
cache13–20.0213%18 Jul
inferno13–40.1016%17 Jul
nuke6–130.0510%17 Jul
mirage13–20.0617%17 Jul
dust213–50.1920%10 Jul
mirage8–130.0115%10 Jul
dust22–13-0.0418%10 Jul
mirage13–90.0116%8 Jul
mirage11–130.0520%8 Jul
mirage12–120.0423%8 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1119%6 Jul
dust23–40.0125%5 Jul
nuke13–50.0412%5 Jul
overpass13–160.0012%5 Jul
ancient13–80.065%5 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0315%4 Jul
anubis13–90.1114%3 Jul
ancient10–13-0.032%3 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0214%3 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0612%3 Jul
anubis15–150.0422%3 Jul
dust26–13-0.0413%3 Jul
ancient13–70.0513%3 Jul
anubis7–10.0633%3 Jul
anubis7–13-0.048%2 Jul
mirage13–160.0130%2 Jul
dust216–130.0524%2 Jul
mirage13–50.0615%2 Jul
dust27–13-0.0415%2 Jul
inferno13–10.034%2 Jul
dust213–80.0832%2 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0225%2 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0522%1 Jul
mirage11–130.0617%1 Jul
dust213–4-0.0613%1 Jul
dust213–9-0.0415%1 Jul
dust210–50.0819%1 Jul
dust213–70.0823%1 Jul
dust213–10-0.0813%1 Jul
anubis5–130.0412%1 Jul
mirage13–90.0211%24 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0221%24 Jun
overpass13–50.0511%24 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0012%24 Jun
ancient5–13-0.127%24 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0118%24 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0315%23 Jun
anubis5–130.0011%23 Jun
mirage13–110.0620%23 Jun
ancient8–130.0411%23 Jun
anubis13–100.0720%23 Jun
inferno13–50.033%23 Jun
mirage11–130.0918%23 Jun
mirage13–00.060%22 Jun
nuke13–90.0135%22 Jun
ancient11–130.0315%18 Jun
inferno9–4-0.009%17 Jun
dust213–40.0423%13 Jun
nuke13–110.0413%10 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →