state from jake farm — CS2 Stats

76561198862438542[U:1:902172814]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,038Tracked matches41%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#176346 of 260065 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (65 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+137Tracked matches · now 3,038

−9.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 40.7%

Rating over time

11,734Peak Premier on CSDB

23Days played since 2026-09-02

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning34

Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–46–10Last 10044%Win rateWLWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +5.5pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 698ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 659ms

Last 20

9–10–1 · 45% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 640ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.9

Utility1.8

Positioning3.4

Opening Duels0.8

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning3.4

Utility1.8

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels1.5

Win Impact1.9

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04

Reaction time634ms−11ms

first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms

Headshot accuracy12.0%+2.2%

first ⅓ avg 9.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 19 Oct →

21%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 3 Nov →

367msFastest reaction time · 5–0 · inferno, 15 Oct →

13–2Biggest win · anubis, 5 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 32dust2Weakest map · 0% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	32	16–16	50%	-0.03
inferno	B	21	10–11	48%	-0.03
anubis	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.04
ancient	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.04
dust2	D	5	0–5	0%	-0.07
cache	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.06
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.04
nuke	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.04
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.09
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

72Matches

39%Win rate

0.77Avg K/D

56.2ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	24	46%	0.85	12.9
Anubis	20	30%	0.65	10.5
Ancient	15	33%	0.88	15.7
Inferno	9	44%	0.76	11.2
Vertigo	2	50%	0.55	9.5
Thera	1	100%	0.72	13.0
Overpass	1	0%	0.39	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.0%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.5%Spray accuracy

82.4%Counter-strafing

12.1°Preaim

637msReaction time

27.1%T opening success

41.6%CT opening success

0.19Enemies flashed / flash

0.8%Flash assists

8.57HE damage / grenade

2.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.0782° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.9653% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.1942 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–5	-0.05	19%	5 Nov →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	18%	5 Nov →
anubis	13–2	0.03	9%	5 Nov →
mirage	4–13	-0.12	12%	5 Nov →
inferno	13–2	0.07	21%	5 Nov →
ancient	10–13	-0.08	8%	5 Nov →
mirage	13–2	0.01	17%	4 Nov →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	21%	3 Nov →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	11%	3 Nov →
anubis	1–13	-0.10	20%	2 Nov →
mirage	13–4	0.00	6%	1 Nov →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	19%	1 Nov →
vertigo	12–12	-0.06	8%	1 Nov →
nuke	13–5	-0.11	2%	1 Nov →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	15%	31 Oct →
anubis	4–13	-0.10	6%	31 Oct →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	7%	31 Oct →
inferno	13–9	-0.09	16%	31 Oct →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	15%	31 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	10%	31 Oct →
anubis	6–13	-0.08	16%	29 Oct →
vertigo	9–13	0.01	6%	29 Oct →
inferno	13–3	-0.01	14%	29 Oct →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	13%	29 Oct →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	7%	29 Oct →
mirage	12–12	0.01	9%	27 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	9%	27 Oct →
mirage	3–0	-0.02	0%	27 Oct →
cache	4–13	-0.06	8%	27 Oct →
anubis	5–13	0.01	16%	26 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.02	6%	26 Oct →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	21%	26 Oct →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	13%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–10	-0.07	10%	26 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.08	8%	25 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	15%	25 Oct →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	7%	25 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.02	15%	25 Oct →
dust2	12–12	-0.07	14%	25 Oct →
vertigo	13–8	-0.10	9%	24 Oct →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	15%	24 Oct →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	14%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	9%	22 Oct →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	13%	22 Oct →
anubis	13–10	-0.09	6%	21 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.03	10%	21 Oct →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	16%	21 Oct →
ancient	9–13	0.02	16%	21 Oct →
anubis	13–9	-0.09	13%	20 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	5%	20 Oct →
ancient	12–12	-0.07	8%	20 Oct →
inferno	2–13	-0.09	9%	20 Oct →
inferno	13–4	0.08	14%	19 Oct →
ancient	12–12	-0.05	12%	19 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	21%	19 Oct →
inferno	13–5	-0.04	8%	19 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.01	11%	19 Oct →
mirage	9–1	-0.03	21%	19 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.02	9%	18 Oct →
anubis	13–3	0.06	6%	18 Oct →
inferno	12–12	0.03	16%	18 Oct →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	9%	18 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.06	5%	18 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	10%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–10	-0.10	12%	17 Oct →
ancient	7–13	0.02	9%	16 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	8%	16 Oct →
inferno	12–12	-0.04	13%	16 Oct →
mirage	6–0	0.06	11%	16 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	9%	15 Oct →
inferno	5–0	0.06	13%	15 Oct →
ancient	13–2	0.02	11%	15 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	17%	14 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	2%	14 Oct →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	10%	14 Oct →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	10%	14 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	17%	14 Oct →
vertigo	13–6	-0.01	10%	14 Oct →
cache	12–12	-0.09	15%	12 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	9%	12 Oct →
mirage	8–2	-0.03	8%	12 Oct →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	14%	12 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	10%	12 Oct →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	0%	12 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	9%	12 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	12%	12 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	5%	12 Oct →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	10%	10 Oct →
office	3–13	-0.09	9%	10 Oct →
anubis	1–13	-0.10	10%	10 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	18%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	6%	10 Oct →
train	13–10	-0.04	9%	10 Oct →
nuke	13–9	0.00	0%	10 Oct →
cache	8–13	-0.10	12%	10 Oct →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	0%	10 Oct →
anubis	7–13	0.00	6%	7 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	13%	7 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.01	11%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	14%	7 Oct →