south korea servers

south korea servers — CS2 Stats

US76561198859518871[U:1:899253143]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

457Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,251Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#84943 of 248394 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,792 +1,542 5 Jun – 6 Jul · 26 days played
17,73319,999peak 19,9995 Jun6 Jul
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-06-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches6——
Win rate33%——
K/D0.85——
Headshot %58%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning40
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateWWLWLWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −65ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 9–8–3 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim4.1
Utility6.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning4.0
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time626ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 8 Jun →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 7 Jun →
430msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · dust2, 9 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 22 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 18dust2Weakest map · 30% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3518–1751%-0.02
dust2D278–1930%-0.02
infernoA1810–856%-0.01
anubisA95–456%-0.01
nukeC52–340%-0.04
ancient—20–20%-0.05
cache—11–0100%-0.04
overpass—11–0100%-0.02
poseidon—10–10%0.07
vertigo—10–10%-0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,954Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
1,458Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
52.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
4,051MVPs
1,007Hours (in match)
1,207Bombs planted
786Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-479,260
AWP2,460
Knife462
MP9374

Lifetime map wins

3,073dust2
1,949inferno
1,158nuke
453vertigo
244train
212cbble
176lake
53office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches
55%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
65.8ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage875%1.1211.0
Dust21100%0.8916.0
Inferno10%0.356.0
Anubis1100%0.8815.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.6%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
630msReaction time
22.0%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
6.99HE damage / grenade
14.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.0361% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.0020%23 Sept →
nuke16–140.0221%18 Sept →
dust210–130.0041%18 Sept →
mirage13–60.0617%31 Aug →
dust210–130.0215%9 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0424%1 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0313%30 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0014%30 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0615%29 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0918%24 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.0418%24 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.068%24 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0723%21 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.064%17 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0617%17 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0230%14 Jul →
mirage13–40.0224%12 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0425%6 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0925%4 Jul →
overpass13–8-0.0222%4 Jul →
mirage16–130.0221%4 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0617%3 Jul →
inferno8–3-0.0227%3 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0510%3 Jul →
dust213–90.0220%3 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0520%2 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0611%2 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0717%2 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0423%2 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0518%1 Jul →
inferno8–80.0320%29 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0238%29 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0143%28 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0413%27 Jun →
mirage3–130.0537%26 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0222%26 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0617%26 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0328%26 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.1442%26 Jun →
poseidon3–90.0737%26 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0529%25 Jun →
anubis13–60.0418%25 Jun →
dust213–110.0428%24 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0320%24 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0124%24 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0220%23 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0725%23 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0420%23 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0322%22 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0619%22 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0421%22 Jun →
inferno13–70.0026%22 Jun →
mirage13–20.1136%22 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0825%21 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0722%21 Jun →
dust29–130.0223%21 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0413%21 Jun →
mirage13–60.0633%21 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0420%21 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0416%20 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0529%20 Jun →
mirage8–130.0033%19 Jun →
inferno11–130.0321%19 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0416%17 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.1016%16 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0425%16 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0024%15 Jun →
inferno13–100.0018%15 Jun →
dust213–90.0520%15 Jun →
dust213–80.0310%15 Jun →
dust24–130.0317%14 Jun →
mirage13–100.0322%14 Jun →
mirage13–60.0519%13 Jun →
dust213–40.0621%12 Jun →
nuke5–9-0.159%12 Jun →
dust26–13-0.056%12 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.059%12 Jun →
vertigo6–9-0.1639%11 Jun →
dust213–90.0228%11 Jun →
dust27–130.0021%11 Jun →
inferno16–120.0028%11 Jun →
mirage13–3-0.0114%11 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0112%10 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0640%10 Jun →
mirage5–130.0138%10 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0220%10 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0432%10 Jun →
inferno13–40.0731%10 Jun →
inferno13–8-0.0636%9 Jun →
anubis13–50.1034%8 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0210%8 Jun →
inferno9–10.236%8 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0224%7 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0410%7 Jun →
dust25–130.0110%7 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0546%7 Jun →
mirage13–70.0531%6 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0135%5 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0114%5 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0313%5 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.